Click here to submit Tips... contact me... information or news articles you wrote that pertain to this site!
Welcome to The Truth News.Info
GORDON DUFF: DEBRA MEDINA, CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE FOR GOVERNOR OF TEXAS TAKES ON THE 9/11 LIE MACHINE
By Gordon Duff
This week, Debra Medina, candidate for governor of
Texas, a real conservative, guns, state sovereignty, a farm girl from Texas, not
a phony Texan from back east like someone else we know, someone who spent his
life hiding behind “mama” took on infamous Fox News/Rupert “Mr. Zionism”
Murdoch’s moronic clown, Glenn Beck. So, Beck, you are now rich, you are
no longer a drunk, you joined the Mormons and you know how to buzz up
idiots. With qualifications like that, you should be Prime Minister of the
Mormonistic Republic of Utah, not just a paid shill.
Conservatives feel they have to legitimize you by
coming on your show. It doesn’t take 5 minutes of investigative reporting
to figure out who you work for, you are a stooge for Fox News. Fox
talks conservative but is the voice of the extremists who have hijacked the
state of Israel and are now holding a good portion of the US government
hostage. Fox, Limbaugh, Beck and crazy apocalypse cult “Christian
Zionists” still control enough of the Republican Party that candidates have to
put up with treason or get squashed by a deluge of Israel/big oil/”pro-war”
money, the profiteers who are living off the suffering of the world and the
lives of Americas war dead.
Debra Media is a 9/11 “truther.” A “truther”
is someone who wants to know the truth and who believes they are being lied
to. I would call this kind of person “reality based.”
AFTER DETROIT, ISRAEL’S ROLE IN 9/11 NEEDS
TO BE LOOKED AT
There is no evidence Israel planned 9/11.
However, there is massive circumstantial evidence that Israel “may” have known
in advance and played a role in planning 9/11 with broad cooperation from the
Bush administration and key members of the military and intelligence
community. This is why we have investigations, real ones, and when we find
our investigations are interfered with, why we have a crime called “obstruction
Any “two bit” lawyer, even one like John Ashcroft
could make a case against Israel on the “Crotch Bomber” in Detroit. This
case is a total walkover. We know it wasn’t meant to kill many people,
just one or two, maybe a few more but it did make billions in profits for
companies tied to Israel and its friends, companies that make airport
scanners. The evidentiary trail leading to Israel on the Detroit bombing
is clear as day. Nobody will go down it or AIPAC, the organization that
funds operations against the United States government and buys and sells
American politicians, newspapers, TV networks and more, much more with impunity,
will reach out and crush anyone who stands in the way.
Can we investigate AIPAC for “material support of
terrorism” or their voice, Fox News, for the same? No. Can we get a
real investigation of 9/11 because so many of the names involved in the Detroit
bombing tie to 9/11 and we finally have real witnesses for this one?
Now that we know how the hijackers got weapons on
the planes, how they got past security and even how some of them were paid, 2
through a “rogue” FBI agent, we can do nothing.
Now that we know, told by the 9/11 Commission
itself, that their report is worthless because it was based on false information
and perjured testimony, we can do nothing.
Now that we have seen a small version of 9/11 played
out with live witnesses and with the stamp “ISRAEL” all over it, we won’t put
the pieces together because there is nobody in the US, nobody of
there is not one major news organization in the
United States that doesn’t have Israeli ownership and management
no single individual has stood up to Israel
without being “accidented” or having their reputation and finances destroyed
or finding themselves arrested for a “crime”
even with millions of Americans and hundreds of
millions around the world clamouring for the truth, nobody says anything
except, as it seems, Debra Medina
IRAQ, THE “SMOKING GUN”
With dozens of scandals, each getting 10 minutes of
press, a game has been created. Mel Gibson, in the film, Edge of
Darkness, explains the process well. The idea is to make things seem
so complicated that nobody can look at anything. Instead of asking how
hijackers get thru Israeli security companies at every airport, we talk about
“nano-thermite” or “melting termperatures.” When supposed “science” went
decades denying that cigarettes cause cancer, do you think denying obvious
science around 9/11 is going to be hard?
In Detroit, we had a terrorist loaded onto a plane,
walked right thru an Israeli security company, an airline security, passport
control and every international law and convention, not to mention security
protocol imaginable, right in front of extremely credible witnesses and still
nothing is done.
Then there is Iraq. The British tried an
investigation, a planned “cover-up” and even that failed. It because so
obvious that Bush and Blair put out a purchase order for phony intelligence that
supported an illegal and disasterous war. Who was the supplier, other than
the CIA and MI-5/6? The majority of the lies were arranged thru Israel,
with a trail as wide and clear as an autobahn on Sunday morning.
Some Americans and many around the world think
Israel does bad things because gangsters who may actually be running the United
States need competent and skilled criminal organizations and our own CIA and FBI
are simply too stupid to be trusted. I can’t say that this is true but is
as likely true as anything on a Fox channel other than sports scores.
Bush and his puppet Blair went after Iraq and, as a
minor consequence, killed America. No big loss, not to them. They
made tons of money Blair is swimming in it now. Check.
It isn’t just Israel. They simply have become
the supplier of bribe money, lies, terrorist planning, “hit squads” and anything
else people will pay for. If not them, we would have to use the Mafia
unless, of course, they run that too, as historical research is now making a
powerful case for.
The real problem is people above the law, American
politicians, some Israeli leaders, Tony Blair and his gang and we only hang
Saddam. He needed to hit the noose with tons of company, most of them from
Washington DC, perhaps from other countries, but if you could make a deck of
cards with 52 Iraqis wanted for crimes, you could print a phone book out of
Washington, London and Tel Aviv.
Think of how much less traffic there would be on the
Germans and Japanese called the war crimes trials
after WW2, “victor’s justice.” Little has changed.
TEXAS AND ONE WOMAN SIMPLY SAYING SOMETHING
SANE IN A WORLD GONE NUTS
Is Debra Medina a great leader, an American of
vision? We haven’t seen that but we saw her ask questions. Was she
pandering to the disaffected by asking for the Obama birth certificate when
George Bush and John McCain have their very “colorful” personal records,
military, criminal, driving even school records buried 5 stories below the
capital under armed guard? If we put the three of them together, what do
we get? Traitor and collaborator during wartime, drunk and addict,
deserter from the military and someone suspected of being born in Kenya?
Which is worse? Next time I get a “truther” I want to hear a request for
the transcripts of the McCain propaganda broadcasts, the Bush cocaine
convictions and then the Obama birth certificate. If you love truth, learn
to love all of it or none of it at all.
Honesty and morality shouldn’t be relative.
Do I give her credit, Debra Medina for asking about
9/11? Yes. Is it that she doesn’t know the rest, know what is
necessary to live in a free country? Should we support candidates for
public office who are ignorant of even the most basic facts? We have to
admit we have set our standards low. Either we elect total idiots or they
are smart people and talk to us like we are total idiots. Either way, they
talk like total idiots. How do we tell the difference?
Why should things be different for her. She
asked one hard question when hundreds of others did less. Give her credit
and hope she learns more.
Related to above, below.
Sarah Palin 9/11 Truther controversy explodes
Beck = Hypocrisy And Fraud!
Report: Bush Lawyer Said President Could Order Civilians to Be 'Massacred'
The report by OPR concludes that Yoo, now a Berkeley law professor, and his boss at the time, Jay Bybee, now a federal judge, should be referred to their state bar associations for possible disciplinary proceedings.
"What about ordering a village of resistants to be massacred? ... Is that a power that the president could legally—"
"Yeah," Yoo replied, according to a partial transcript included in the report. "Although, let me say this: So, certainly, that would fall within the commander-in-chief's power over tactical decisions."
"To order a village of civilians to be [exterminated]?" the OPR investigator asked again.
Spiritual Wickedness In High Places" By Chuck Baldwin
February 17, 2010
Almost immediately after Adam's fall, Lucifer and his minions collaborated
with evil men to usurp God's authority and sovereignty. And nowhere is God
more sovereign than in the heart and conscience of man. In the spirit world,
the First Commandment ("Thou shalt have no other gods before me") is the
battleground that is most fought over. The war for man's heart and soul is
Nimrod was the first would-be tyrant to try and bring the world into a
global "New World Order." His handiwork produced the Tower of Babel, which
brought about a cataclysmic judgment from Jehovah. However, while Nimrod was
the first globalist to try and unify the nations against God, he was
certainly not the last. The Pharaohs, Darius, Artaxerxes, Cyrus, Alexander,
Nebuchadnezzar, the Caesars, and hundreds like them have all brought their
tyrannical rule over the hearts of men. And their ideas and passions are as
alive and active in the world today as ever.
With every would-be world tyrant, there is one constant: the unholy marriage
between a supranational government and Big Religion. If Jehovah God made
anything clear in the Mosaic model of government, it was the fact
that--until Christ Himself comes to occupy both offices--the offices of
Priest and King were to be eternally separate. At least one Old Testament
Jewish king learned that lesson the hard way.
Yet, Big Government and Big Religion have always come together for the
purpose of enslaving the masses. The devilish duo of Big Government and Big
Religion killed the Old Testament prophets. They hung Jesus on the cross and
persecuted the early Church. They murdered masses during the Dark Ages; they
managed the Holocaust; and their obnoxious offspring are still at work
today. This criminal cabal has been the bane of genuine faith and personal
liberty since the beginning of time.
When Colonial America fired that shot heard around the world and fought
their way to independence, they broke free, not only from the political
domination of the Crown, but also from the religious domination of a State
Church. No longer would citizens be required to join a particular church in
order to hold public office. No longer would citizens be required to
financially support churches and institutions they deemed to be offensive to
their spiritual convictions. No longer could a religious institution use the
power and force of civil government to subjugate men to its tenets and, yes,
tentacles. Indeed, the apostate kingdom created by Constantine's spiritual
whoredom ended at the eastern shore of America!
And dare I say that I am proud of my Anabaptist forebears for helping to
embed the principle of religious liberty into American law and
jurisprudence? Indeed, I am! What many Americans do not know (and what many
militant secularists refuse to acknowledge) is that it was the influence of
the Colonial Baptists--most notably, the Baptist minister John Leland--that
was most responsible for the First Amendment being added to the US
Therefore, it is more than disturbing when I see evangelical Christians
being seduced by the ancient Big Government/Big Religion whorish union
today. How can any true Gospel preacher accept federal Faith-Based
Initiative monies, except that he has either lost all understanding of what
freedom truly means, or is willing to sacrifice the sacred principles of
liberty upon the altar of his own selfish interests? How can any true Gospel
preacher not realize that Big Religion has always conspired with tyrannical
governmental forces against the true Gospel message? Why are they so blind
to these devilish conspiracies? At the highest levels of virtually every
major religion, the conspiracy to hijack truth and enslave the masses is
constantly at work, whether it is Catholicism, Judaism, or Protestantism.
This is what the Apostle Paul warned about in Ephesians 6:12. "For we
wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against
powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual
wickedness in high places."
Of course, the "rulers of the darkness of this world" are demonic. But it is
also an absolute certainty that these demonic forces accomplish their
devilish deeds through evil men who are given to "spiritual wickedness in
Was not the spiritual netherworld complicit in helping to construct Nimrod's
Tower of Babel? Was not spiritual wickedness at work when Pharaoh murdered
the little children of the Hebrews? Were not dark principalities at work
when Nebuchadnezzar ordered everyone to bow to the image of the Babylonian
leader? When the Lord Jesus called Jewish King Herod a "fox," was not He
acknowledging Herod's complicity with evil? Were not spiritual powers aiding
and abetting the Jewish Sanhedrin when they moved the crowd to crucify the
Son of God? When the early Church was being persecuted, was not spiritual
wickedness at work? When nonconforming Christians were thrown to the lions
and sawn asunder, were not their tormentors influenced by these same rulers
of darkness? Of course they were!
Then, why is it so difficult for modern Christians--especially our pastors
and preachers--to understand that this unholy union of Big Government and
Big Religion is as evil and sinful today as it ever was? Why are they
unwilling to recognize that the same devilish system that plagued the Church
throughout the ages--suspended only temporarily by the successful revolution
for American independence--is rearing its ugly head again? Why are they
unwilling to believe that many of America's leaders (from both parties)
routinely give themselves to luciferian rituals, such as those annual dances
around the fire at the Bohemian Grove? Why is it so hard to believe that we
have leaders (from both parties) who have given themselves to dark, secret
societies, such as Skull and Bones? Why are they not suspicious when certain
religious schools and institutions repeatedly produce many of the leaders
(from both parties) who seem to universally take America down the same path
As most Christians should know, The Beast of Revelation is as much a SYSTEM
as it is a person. As the Apostle John warned, the "spirit of antichrist . .
. even now already is it in the world." (I John 4:3) He also warned, "Even
now are there many antichrists." (I John 2:18)
Any Big Government/Big Religion system that seeks to bring nations into
global unity, enshrine a politically correct theology of universalism,
establish Church/State uniformity, and marginalize independent,
nonconformist ideology is nothing more than the emergence of another Tower
of Babel or Beast-like system! And, dear Christian friend, has it occurred
to you that our central government in Washington, D.C., is currently engaged
in all of the above?
Both political parties--including most of our national leaders and news
media--actively promote globalism; universalism is, without a doubt, the
unofficial--but clearly understood--national religion; and anyone who holds
nonconformist views (i.e., pro-life, Jesus-only theology, anti-UN,
anti-illegal immigration, questioning official government explanations of
national tragedies, etc.) is being viciously ridiculed, impugned, and
marginalized by virtually everyone in the national press corps and central
government. Yes, I am saying it, THE BEAST IS EMERGING IN WASHINGTON, D.C.!
The powers that be in both Big Government and Big Religion want to control
both our hearts and our minds. They cannot tolerate dissent. Mind you: they
do not care if one is Republican or Democrat, because at the national level,
both major parties are marching in the same beastly direction. They do not
care if one is conservative or liberal, because the leaders of both camps
are, likewise, marching in lockstep to the tune being played by The Beast.
They do not care if one is Jewish, Catholic, or Protestant, because at the
highest levels, these religions are committing whoredom with The Beast.
If a pastor or preacher is going to be true to his calling today, he must be
willing to adopt the philosophy of the late, great Charles Haddon Spurgeon,
who said, "The more prominent you are in Christ's service, the more certain
are you to be the butt of calumny [slander]. I have long ago said farewell
to my character. I lost it in the earlier days of my ministry by being a
little more zealous than suited a slumbering age. And I have never been able
to regain it except in the sight of Him who judges all the earth, and in the
hearts of those who love me for my work's sake."
Any desire for promotion, pleasure, riches, or fame will quickly make one a
servant of The Beast. And, I'm afraid, that is exactly what many of today's
pastors and preachers have become.
The fight for independence was as much for the freedom of the heart and mind
as it was for the freedom of a State or nation. In fact, one cannot enslave
the latter until he first enslaves the former. And this is what is currently
at stake: the freedom of the heart and soul to be governed by God and no
other! And this battle will never be won--at least not nationally--as long
as Christians and pastors are unwilling to recognize the enemy for what it
is: "spiritual wickedness in high places."
Americans have been losing the
protection of law for years. In the 21st century the
loss of legal protections accelerated with the Bush
"war on terror," which continues under the Obama
administration and is essentially a war on the
Constitution and U.S. civil liberties.
The Bush regime was determined to
vitiate habeas corpus in order to hold people
indefinitely without bringing charges. The regime had
acquired hundreds of prisoners by paying a bounty for
terrorists. Afghan warlords and thugs responded to the
financial incentive by grabbing unprotected people and
selling them to the Americans.
The Bush regime needed to hold the
prisoners without charges because it had no evidence
against the people and did not want to admit that the
U.S. government had stupidly paid warlords and thugs to
kidnap innocent people. In addition, the Bush regime
needed "terrorists" prisoners in order to prove that there was a terrorist
As there was no evidence against
the "detainees" (most have been released without charges after years of
detention and abuse), the U.S. government needed a way
around U.S. and international laws against torture in
order that the government could produce evidence via
self-incrimination. The Bush regime found inhumane and
totalitarian-minded lawyers and put them to work at the
U.S. Department of Justice (sic) to invent arguments
that the Bush regime did not need to obey the law.
The Bush regime created a new
classification for its detainees that it used to justify
denying legal protection and due process to the
detainees. As the detainees were not U.S. citizens and
were demonized by the regime as
"the 760 most
dangerous men on earth," there was little public
outcry over the regime’s unconstitutional and inhumane
As our Founding Fathers and a long
list of scholars warned, once civil liberties are
breached, they are breached for all. Soon U.S. citizens
were being held indefinitely in violation of their
habeas corpus rights.
Dr. Aafia Siddiqui, an American citizen of Pakistani
origin, might have been the first.
Dr. Siddiqui, a scientist educated
at MIT and Brandeis University, was seized in Pakistan
for no known reason, sent to Afghanistan, and was held
secretly for five years in the U.S. military’s notorious
Bagram prison in Afghanistan. Her three young children,
one an 8-month-old baby, were with her at the time she
was abducted. She has no idea what has become of her two
youngest children. Her oldest child, 7 years old, was
also incarcerated in Bagram and subjected to similar
abuse and horrors.
Siddiqui has never been charged
with any terrorism-related offense. A British
journalist, hearing her piercing screams as she was
disclosed her presence.. An embarrassed U.S.
government responded to the disclosure by sending
Siddiqui to the U.S. for trial on the trumped-up charge
that while a captive, she grabbed a U.S. soldier’s rifle
and fired two shots attempting to shoot him. The charge
apparently originated as a U.S. soldier’s excuse for
shooting Dr. Siddiqui twice in the stomach, resulting in
her near death.
On Feb. 4, Dr. Siddiqui was
convicted by a New York jury for attempted murder. The
only evidence presented against her was the charge
itself and an unsubstantiated claim that she had once
taken a pistol-firing course at an American firing
range. No evidence was presented of her fingerprints on
the rifle that this frail and broken 100-pound woman had
allegedly seized from an American soldier. No evidence
was presented that a weapon was fired, no bullets, no
shell casings, no bullet holes. Just an accusation.
this to say about the trial:"The trial took
an unusual turn when an FBI official asserted that the
fingerprints taken from the rifle, which was purportedly
used by Aafia to shoot at the U.S. interrogators, did
not match hers."
An ignorant and bigoted American
jury convicted her for being a Muslim. This is the kind
that always results when the state hypes fear and
demonizes a group.
The people who should have been on
trial are the people who abducted her, disappeared her
young children, shipped her across international
borders, violated her civil liberties, tortured her
apparently for the fun of it, raped her, and attempted
to murder her with two gunshots to her stomach. Instead,
the victim was put on trial and convicted.
This is the unmistakable hallmark
of a police state. And this victim is an American
Anyone can be next. Indeed, on Feb.
3 Dennis Blair, director of National Intelligence told
the House Intelligence Committee that it was now
that the U.S. government can murder its own citizens on
the sole basis of someone in the government’s judgment
that an American is a threat. No arrest, no trial, no
conviction, just execution on suspicion of being a
This shows how far the police state
has advanced. A presidential appointee in the Obama
administration tells an important committee of Congress
that the executive branch has decided that it can murder
American citizens abroad if it thinks they are a threat.
I can hear readers saying the
government might as well kill Americans abroad as it
kills them at home--Waco, Ruby Ridge, the Black
Yes, the U.S. government has
murdered its citizens, but Dennis Blair’s
is a bold new development. The government, of course,
denies that it intended to kill the Branch Davidians,
Randy Weaver’s wife and child, or the Black Panthers.
The government says that Waco was a terrible tragedy, an
unintended result brought on by the Branch Davidians
themselves. The government says that Ruby Ridge was
Randy Weaver’s fault for not appearing in court on a day
that had been miscommunicated to him. The Black
Panthers, the government says, were dangerous criminals
who insisted on a shoot-out.
In no previous death of a U.S.
citizen by the hands of the U.S. government has the
government claimed the right to kill Americans without
arrest, trial, and conviction of a capital crime.
In contrast, Dennis Blair has told
the U.S. Congress that the executive branch has assumed
the right to murder Americans who it deems a
will make the decision? What it means is that the
government will murder whomever it chooses.
There is no more complete or
compelling evidence of a police state than the
government announcing that it will murder its own
citizens if it views them as a
Ironic, isn’t it, that
"the war on
terror" to make us safe ends in a police state with
the government declaring the right to murder American
citizens whom it regards as a threat.
Aspartame has been renamed and is now being marketed as a natural sweetener Link
(NaturalNews) In response to growing awareness about the dangers of artificial sweeteners, what does the manufacturer of one of the world's most notable artificial sweeteners
do? Why, rename it and begin marketing it as natural, of course. This is precisely the strategy of Ajinomoto, maker of aspartame, which hopes to pull the wool over the eyes of
the public with its rebranded version of aspartame, called "AminoSweet".
Over 25 years ago, aspartame was first introduced into the European food supply. Today, it is an
everyday component of most diet beverages, sugar-free desserts, and chewing gums in countries worldwide. But the tides have been turning as the general public is waking up to
the truth about artificial sweeteners like aspartame and the harm they cause to health. The latest aspartame marketing scheme is a desperate effort to indoctrinate the public
into accepting the chemical sweetener as natural and safe, despite evidence to the contrary.
Aspartame was an accidental discovery by James Schlatter, a chemist who had
been trying to produce an anti-ulcer pharmaceutical drug for G.D. Searle & Company back in 1965. Upon mixing aspartic acid and phenylalanine, two naturally-occurring amino
acids, he discovered that the new compound had a sweet taste. The company merely changed its FDA approval application from drug to food additive and, voila, aspartame was
G.D. Searle & Company first patented aspartame in 1970. An internal memo released in the same year urged company executives to work on getting the FDA into the
"habit of saying yes" and of encouraging a "subconscious spirit of participation" in getting the chemical approved.
G.D. Searle & Company submitted its first petition to
the FDA in 1973 and fought for years to gain FDA approval, submitting its own safety studies that many believed were inadequate and deceptive. Despite numerous objections,
including one from its own scientists, the company was able to convince the FDA to approve aspartame for commercial use in a few products in 1974, igniting a blaze of
In 1976, then FDA Commissioner Alexander Schmidt wrote a letter to Sen. Ted Kennedy expressing concern over the "questionable integrity of the basic safety
data submitted for aspartame safety". FDA Chief Counsel Richard Merrill believed that a grand jury should investigate G.D. Searle & Company for lying about the safety of
aspartame in its reports and for concealing evidence proving the chemical is unsafe for consumption.
Despite the myriad of evidence gained over the years showing that
aspartame is a dangerous toxin, it has remained on the global market with the exception of a few countries that have banned it. In fact, it continued to gain approval for use in
new types of food despite evidence showing that it causes neurological brain damage, cancerous tumors, and endocrine disruption, among other things.
The details of
aspartame's history are lengthy, but the point remains that the carcinogen was illegitimately approved as a food additive through heavy-handed prodding by a powerful corporation
with its own interests in mind. Practically all drugs and food additives are approved by the FDA not because science shows they are safe but because companies essentially lobby
the FDA with monetary payoffs and complete the agency's multi-million dollar approval process.
Changing aspartame's name to something that is "appealing and memorable",
in Ajinomoto's own words, may hoodwink some but hopefully most will reject this clever marketing tactic as nothing more than a desperate attempt to preserve the company's
multi-billion dollar cash cow. Do not be deceived.