Everyone wants to indulge a sweet tooth at this festive time of year, without suffering the inevitable consequences of weight gain. But, be
aware of the hidden (not listed on ingredient labels) dangers of Neotame sweetener in almost everything consumed by humans, and now even in
feed for livestock raised for human consumption.
In 1998, Monsanto applied for FDA approval for a monster molecule, "based on the aspartame formula" with one critical addition:
3-dimethylbutyl [listed on EPA's most hazardous chemical list]. Neotame is touted as being 13,000 times sweeter than sugar.
On July 5, 2002 - Monsanto's Neotame molecule was approved by the USFDA over formally registered objections of the Aspartame Consumer Safety
Network and others. (Long term effects on humans are unknown.) Read the full release on The Aspartame Consumer Safety Network.
The food labeling requirements required for aspartame have now been dropped for Neotame, and no one is clear why this was allowed to happen.
Neotame has been ruled acceptable, and without being included on the list of ingredients, for:
1.USDA Certified Organic food items.
2.Certified Kosher products with the official letter k inside the circle on labels.
Ever ready to give the public what it craves - guilt-free, low calorie treats that taste as good as sugar, is the multi billion dollar
sweetener industry. The sugar industry pales by comparison, in the profit generating arena. Fake sugars, in the form of Aspartame and now the
Aspartame super clone, Neotame, give 'foodies' and fitness fanatics false hope and the empty promise that all can 'have our cake and eat it,
too.' Not necessarily so.
Controversy has swirled around the artificial sweetener, Aspartame, now also known as AminoSweet, since its FDA approval in 1982. Virtually
all corporate sponsored scientific studies show aspartame to be perfectly safe. Virtually all independently done studies show just the
opposite. In the lab, Aspartame was shown to cause the following forms of cancers: brain tumors, pancreatic tumors, breast tumors and uterine
tumors. Five deaths are registered with FDA. In more recent tests, leukemia, lymphoma and kidney cancers were discovered as well.
There is a parallel issue with which to compare the Aspartame issue. That of cigarettes and the deadly effects of smoking. The massive
Tobacco Industry is able to produce large volumes of scientific studies showing smoking does not cause: lung cancer, heart disease, strokes
or death. Today, mainstream science accepts the fact that smoking can be deadly and addictive. So it is with Aspartame, whose approval was
based, not on scientific fact, but as an issue of public policy.
One form of subliminal advertising, called Product Placement, was successfully used in the 30's through the 60's, by the Tobacco Industry, in
films, later on television and in newspaper articles. Product Placement has been successfully employed, in like manner, for Aspartame
products, such as diet sodas, etc. Popular actors on sit coms asking pointedly for a Diet Coke, for example. Only once, in the film, I Love
Trouble, have I noted seeing a diet drink consumed by the villain. This was in a film about a mythical chemical company which produced a
neurotoxic bovine growth hormone product. Sound familiar?
Ironically, prior to U.S. government approval of this controversial new sweetener, Neotame was approved by the regulatory agency in
Australia, the day after Donald Rumsfeld (former CEO of the drug company that falsified tests to gain Aspartame approval in the U.S.), was in
that country for a one day meeting with government officials. Coincidence? Maybe.
What's the latest, in-your-face, profit making method utilized by the makers of Neotame, partnering with a Health Care company in India? The
most recent Press Release from the company explains novel new uses proposed for the ubiquitous new Aspartame formula-based sweetener, Neotame
EnSigns Health Care Pvt Ltd and The NutraSweet Co USA have recently launched 'Sweetos', a cattle feed sweetener. Sweetos has been developed
with Neotame, a high intensity sweetener.
Amino acids based sweetener Neotame is 8,000 to 13,000 times sweeter than sugar and is a patented product of the NutraSweet Co USA. Ensigns
is one of the leading manufacturer of Sweetos, low calorie sweeteners for the food industry. Together the two companies have launched this
sweetener to be added to cattle feed.
Presently, molasses is used as a feed sweetener to mask the low palatable taste of certain non-conventional feed ingredients. But, the prices
of molasses have sky rocketed due to its use as a raw material in alcohol production and other chemical manufacturing industries. Besides,
there are stringent regulatory measures for purchase and use of molasses.
"Sweetos is an economical substitute for molasses. Sweetos guarantees the masking of unpleasant tastes and odor and improves the palatability
of feed. This product will be economical for farmers and manufacturers of cattle feed. It can also be used in mineral mixture," said Craig
Petray, CEO, The NutraSweet Company.
Sweetos is 20 per cent cheaper than molasses, which costs Rs 14 per kg. While Sweetos is priced at Rs 11 per kg, which is available in both
powder and liquid form. Ensigns' has a manufacturing facility at Wagholi, where the company manufactures low calorie sweeteners for the food
and beverage (F&B) industry containing sucralose. "We are in talks with the animal husbandry department to reach out to farmers and are
trying to tie up with extension services with co-operative societies as well. Cattle consume more fodder when mixed with Sweetos. This
product has great export potential as well," said Mohan Nair, chairman, Ensigns Health Care.
The NutraSweet Company is looking at launching the same product in Brazil soon. It will also launch tabletop sweeteners and products in
India. India also has approved the usage of Neotame in the F&B industry in July 2010. Ensigns, therefore, also plans to replace its sucralose
based sweetening products with Neotame soon.
Diet sweeteners being used to fatten cattle, by causing them to eat more feed, before they become your favorite burger, steak, cheese or
other dairy product? This NutraSweet produced document proves our point that Aspartame, Neotame and related sweeteners cause weight gain,
loss of appetite control (and cancers) - in animals and humans.
Find out more about which neuroexcitatory sweeteners are in your foods, beverages and chewing gums. Eliminating them could be a life saving
Mary Nash Stoddard is a freelance journalist, lecturer, expert medical witness, former member President's Council on Food Safety, voting
member Texas Radio Hall of Fame and founder of Aspartame Consumer Safety Network and Pilot Hotline (1987-present). Mary edits the toxicology
source book, Deadly Deception Story of Aspartame. Her articles appear regularly in print publications and on the Internet on a Food Safety
BEIJING: The World Bank has issued its first yuan-denominated bond in a move that will help China as it tries to increase the use of its
currency in global markets.
The Washington-based lender said Tuesday it would raise 500 million yuan (76 million dollars) from the two-year bond issue on Hong Kong's
yuan-denominated bond market.
The move will "further deepen the market and permit investors to diversify their currency holdings and expand renminbi exposure", the World
Bank said in a statement, using the official name for the Chinese unit.
Last month, China said its second yuan-denominated bond issue in Hong Kong had initially raised five billion yuan, with plans for another
three billion yuan to be sold.
The move followed Beijing's first yuan-denominated bond issue in Hong Kong in September last year, worth about six billion yuan.
It also comes after heavy equipment maker Caterpillar and fast-food giant McDonald's each issued yuan-denominated bonds in Hong Kong, the
first such sales by non-financial foreign firms in the city.
The semi-autonomous Chinese territory is acting as a test bed for the internationalisation of China's currency.
Beijing is seeking to broaden the use of the yuan in the financial hub after approving its use to settle cross-border trade in 2009.
Despite the global success of Chinese exporters, the yuan plays only a minor international role because it cannot be freely exchanged for
other currencies. And official controls make it difficult to move the yuan in and out of China.
Top leaders in Beijing want to see the yuan adopted as a global reserve currency to reflect China's growing economic and political clout.
Allowing the yuan to be used more widely overseas also helps China reduce the amount of dollars flowing into the country, which is adding to
its already world-beating foreign exchange stockpile and fanning inflation.
Russia, China and Iran to forge a new energy axis this year
The Iran-Turkmenistan gas pipeline is inaugurated on 6 January. More are expected to link Russia, Iran and China through Central Asia. Europe
appears to be losing the race for Caspian Sea and Central Asian oil and gas; it might end up dependent on Moscow for supplies.
Moscow (AsiaNews/Agencies) – The Dauletabad-Sarakhs-Khangiran pipeline was inaugurated on Wednesday connecting Iran's northern Caspian region
with Turkmenistan's vast gas field. Increasingly, Iran is turning to China and Russia not only as buyers of its gas but also as builders of
pipelines. Moscow and Beijing are thus making inroads into Central Asia's vast energy reservoir. By contrast, Europe and the United States
are still at the discussion stage when it comes to building pipelines towards the West.
The 182-kilometer Turkmen-Iranian pipeline starts "modestly" with the pumping of 8 billion cubic meters (bcm) of Turkmen gas, but will meet
the energy requirements of Iran's Caspian region. Its annual capacity is however 20bcm, which will allow Iran to export its own gas to the
The pipeline could be extended through Turkmenistan to the northern shore of the Caspian sea and from there, be connected to a gas pipeline
Russia and China are discussing that would link the Russian Black Sea port of Novorossiysk to Alashankou on Sino-Kazakh border.
Russia, Iran and Turkmenistan hold respectively the world's largest, second-largest and fourth-largest gas reserves and China needs a lot of
energy and is willing to invest heavily to get it.
At the same time, Moscow wants to remain Europe's main gas supplier. Chinese competition in Central Asia and the Caspian region are thus not
a major irritant. Moscow in fact is already well-entrenched in the area with its own installations and has developed its own ties with the
region's countries. Thus, no energy flows from the region towards Europe. At the same time, Moscow has offered Turkmenistan a better price
than China for its gas. Indeed, Russia relies on Turkmen gas for its domestic need and exports its own gas to Europe at a higher price.
Iran is isolated by Western sanctions and is turning more and more eastward and towards Russia.
Iran and Turkmenistan have forged closer ties recently, thanks in part to the intervention of Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.
The overall situation is complicated by Turkey's desire to become a hub for energy flowing to Europe. For this reason, the Turkish
government has downplayed the existing 2,577km pipeline connecting Tabriz in north-western Iran with Ankara.
This intricate pattern of relations spells the end of US policy towards Caspian oil and gas, which was designed to bypass Russia, whilst
keeping China out and Iran isolated.
Russia is now planning to strengthen its ties with Azerbaijan, further undermining Western efforts to engage Baku as a supplier for Nabucco.
In tandem with Russia, Iran and Azerbaijan in December inked an agreement to deliver gas to Iran through the 1,400km Kazi-Magomed-Astara
Conscious that it has fewer cards to play, Europe is pushing for Russia's South Stream and North Stream, which will supply gas to northern
and southern Europe.
The stumbling blocks for North Stream have been cleared as Denmark (in October), Finland and Sweden (in November) and Germany (in December)
approved the project. Construction should begin in the spring.
The new pipeline will bypass Soviet-era transit routes via Ukraine, Poland and Belarus and run from the north-western Russian port of Vyborg
to the German port of Greifswald along a 1,220km route under the Baltic Sea.
What's happening on the Korean peninsula? If you read the press or listen to the talking heads, your best guess would be
that an insane North
Korean regime is willing to risk war to manage its own internal political tensions. This conclusion would be hard to avoid
because the media rarely provide any historical context or alternative explanations for North Korean actions. For example, much has been said
about the March 2010 (alleged) North Korean torpedo attack on the Cheonan (a South Korean naval vessel) near Baengnyeong Island, and the
November 2010 North Korean artillery attack on Yeonpyeong Island (which houses a South Korean military base). The conventional wisdom is that
both attacks were motivated by North Korean elite efforts to smooth the leadership transition underway in their country. The take away: North
Korea is an out-of-control country, definitely not to be trusted or engaged in negotiations.
But is that an adequate explanation for these events? Before examining the facts surrounding them, let's introduce a bit
of history. Take a look at the map below, which includes both Baengnyeong and Yeonpyeong Islands.
Contested seas. The NLL is represented by the blue A line. The MDL is represented by the red B line.
1: Yeonpyeong Island (artillery clas); 2: Baengnyeong Island (Cheonan sinking); 3: Daecheong Island. [source]
The armistice that ended the Korean War
fighting established the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) which separates North Korea from South Korea. At that time, the U.S. government
unilaterally established another dividing line, one intended to create a sea border between the two Koreas. That border is illustrated on the
map by line A, the blue Northern Limit Line (NLL).
As you can see, instead of extending the DMZ westward into the sea, the U.S. line runs northward, limiting North Korea's sea
access. The line was drawn this way for two reasons: First, when the fighting stopped, South Korean forces were in control of the islands off
the North Korean coast and the U.S. wanted to secure their position. Second, control over those islands enhanced the ability of U.S. forces
to monitor and maintain military pressure on North Korea.
North Korea never accepted the NLL. It argued for an alternative border, illustrated by line B, the red West Sea Military
Demarcation Line (MDL). Acknowledging the reality of Southern forces on the islands off its coast, North Korea sought recognition for a sea
border that went around the islands but otherwise divided the sea by extending the DMZ line.
The critical point here is that the South Korean and U.S. promoted NLL is not recognized by international law; it has no
legal standing. Don't take my word for it. The following is from Bloomberg News:
?Then-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger wrote in a 1975 classified cable that the unilaterally drawn Northern
Limit Line was ?clearly contrary to international law.? Two years before, the American ambassador said in another cable that many nations
would view South Korea and its U.S. ally as ?in the wrong? if clashes occurred in disputed areas along the boundary. ...
?The line snakes around the Ongjin peninsula, creating a buffer for five island groups that South Korea kept
under the armistice that ended the 1950-1953 Korean War, in which U.S.-led forces fought under a UN mandate against North Korean and Chinese
troops. The agreement doesn't mention a sea border, which isn't on UN maps drawn up at the time.
?The 3-nautical mile (3.5-statute mile) territorial limit used to devise the line was standard then. Today
almost all countries, including both Koreas, use a 12-mile rule, and the islands are within 12 miles of the North Korean mainland. The
furthest is about 100 miles (160 kilometers) from the closest major South Korean port at Incheon.
??If it ever went to arbitration, the decision would likely move the line further south,? said Mark J. Valencia,
a maritime lawyer and senior research fellow with the National Bureau of Asian Research, who has written extensively on the dispute. ...
?North Korea, after spending two decades rebuilding its forces, sent vessels across the border 43 times between
October and November 1973, sparking confrontations, according to the South Korean Navy's website. At a meeting with the UN Command, the
North's claim that it was operating within its own waters because the NLL was invalid was rejected.
?Kissinger and other U.S. diplomats privately raised questions about the legality of the sea border and South
Korea's policing of it in cables that have been declassified and are available to the public.
??The ROK and the U.S. might appear in the eyes of a significant number of other countries to be in the wrong?
if an incident occurred in disputed areas, U.S. Ambassador Francis Underhill wrote in a Dec. 18, 1973, cable to Washington, using the acronym
for Republic of Korea.
?South Korea ?is wrong in assuming we will join in attempt to impose NLL? on North Korea, said a Dec. 22, 1973,
?Joint State-Defense Message? to the U.S. Embassy in Seoul. ...
?The line ?was unilaterally established and not accepted by NK,? Kissinger wrote in a confidential February 1975
cable. ?Insofar as it purports unilaterally to divide international waters, it is clearly contrary to international law.??
I doubt that discussions of the two events noted above mentioned this history.
Tensions in the region are not just the result of past political decisions. Critical decisions continue to be made. For
example, in October 2007, an inter-Korean summit meeting between Roh Moo-Hyun (the previous South Korean president) and Kim Jong Il (the
North Korean leader) produced a commitment by both sides to negotiate a joint fishing area and create a ?peace and cooperation zone? in the West
Sea. This agreement could have greatly reduced tensions between the two countries and helped to promote a peaceful reunification process.
However, a few months after the summit, the newly elected and current South Korean president, Lee Myung-bak, rejected the
agreements reached at that summit and the previous one held in 2000. Lee openly derided past South Korean efforts to improve relations with,
and called for aggressive actions against, the North. The U.S. government supported Lee's position.
With this as background, let's now consider the first event, North Korea's alleged sinking of the Cheonan. The Lee administration claims that a North
Korean submarine was responsible for the sinking of the Cheonan and the deaths of 49 sailors. The Cheonan was an anti-submarine ship,
participating in war games at the time of its sinking in the disputed waters surrounding Baengnyeong Island. Significantly, after weeks of
official investigation into the cause of the sinking, Lee publicly blamed North Korea only one day before local elections were scheduled,
elections that the ruling party was predicted to lose. In fact, Lee's party did take a beating at the polls.
But what about the evidence for North Korean responsibility? North Korea has denied any involvement in the sinking. In fact,
there is good reason to believe that the Cheonan sank because it hit a reef; that is what its captain reported when he radioed the South
Korean coast guard seeking help.
As I noted in a previous posting, perhaps the most compelling evidence casting doubt on South Korean government claims that the Cheonan was
torpedoed by a North Korean submarine is the fact that all the Cheonan victims died of drowning, nearly all of the 58 surviving crew members
escaped serious injury, and the ship's internal instruments remained intact. According to several scientists, if the Cheonan had been hit by
a torpedo, the entire crew would have been sent flying, leading to fractured bones and the destruction of instruments.
Aggressive War Games
What about the most recent incident involving the North Korean artillery attack on Yeonpyeong Island? The South Korean
position is that its military was merely engaged in ?routine? war games (involving over 70,000 troops), which also happened to include the
firing of live ammunition into the sea from a military base on the island. It had done nothing to provoke a North Korean artillery attack on
In reality, the South had been strengthening its
artillery on the island for some time, engaging in ever more aggressive (non-live ammunition) artillery drills with the apparent aim of
boosting its capacity to inhibit the movement of the North Korean navy even in its own waters. These drills were a direct threat to North
Korean security given how close the island is to its coast.
Moreover, although the South claims that its war games and artillery fire were routine, it may be the first time that the
South has staged major war games and simultaneously engaged in firing live ammunition into territory claimed by the North. The North fired on
the South Korean artillery batteries located on Yeonpyeong Island only after its repeated demands that the South stop its live ammunition
firing were rejected by the South.
Many unanswered questions remain about the Cheonan sinking and the Yeonpyeong attack. However, what does appear clear is
that there are many complexities surrounding these events that are never made public here in North America, and that these omissions end up
reinforcing a view of North Korean motivations and actions that is counterproductive to what should be our goal: achieving peace on the
What might help? How about encouraging the U.S. government to accept North Korean offers to engage in good faith
negotiations aimed at signing a peace treaty to officially end the Korean War as a first step toward normalized relations. The fact that our
government is reluctant to publicly acknowledge the contested nature of the NLL or pursue an end to the Korean War raises important questions
about the motivations driving foreign policy. ?
Martin Hart-Landsberg is Professor of Economics and Director of the Political Economy Program at Lewis and Clark
College, Portland, Oregon; and Adjunct Researcher at the Institute for Social Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, South Korea. This
article first appeared on his blog Reports from the Economic
As the mainstream media attempts to downplay the latest die-off event, which has now gone global, it is worthwhile to keep track of the story
lines. Feel free to add your own to the comments section, and we will update accordingly.
Mainstream Explanations: Lightning, hail, mid-air collision, power lines, and New Year fireworks for the birds . . . but disease for
the fish. This is even rolling eyes in the mainstream media. Birds are incredibly sensitive to their environment (think Canary in
the coal mine), and the thought that they were caught by surprise, or that they "fowled" up their flight pattern is patently
ridiculous. And where are the roasted birds from this lightning strike? And what about fish dying in the same region? Just
a "disease" coincidence. One mainstream headline has to be enshrined as the saddest attempt at sensationalism, while revealing an
obvious natural conclusion Falling Birds Likely Died From
Massive Trauma. Really?
Meteor showers: We are in a period of intense seasonal meteor
showers, and several perennial YouTubers reported hearing sonic
booms in the area that could have indicated a local shock wave. This would
be one non-conspiratorial, natural cause that actually makes sense, but it is hard to connect to both birds and fish, unless it produced a
disabling frequency. There were indeed other sound anomalies according to the report highlighted above. New Madrid Fault Line: An excellent article by The American Dream collated data about the recent earthquake activity along
this fault line that runs along the mid-eastern section of the U.S. Combined with gas fracking, the immense geological activity in
the region, and the BP oil drilling disaster, which off-gassed the dispersant, Corexit, into the atmosphere, and we should be wondering
about any mass deaths in the region. Nevertheless, this has turned into a global event, so the above could be a side effect of
something larger, or a direct contributing factor.
Government testing: The long history of government testing has been exposed by many researchers. The strange component to
this die-off is that only certain species have been affected, but within the entire region. And some reports have indicated that the
organs of these birds were liquefied, which could indicate a possible virus. Could this implicate species-specific bio-weapons? It is on
record that discussions have taken place about race-specific bio-weapons;
perhaps this is a test of delivery capability?
GMO mutation: Mike Adams of
Natural News sets forth an interesting theory: this latest event is
local, but the die-offs are happening across species as bee populations and bats are also declining. Adams points out that Monsanto has
a corporate office in Arkansas. Just wondering.
Geoengineering: Could spraying in the area have caused this type of fallout? Perhaps something new added to the mixture?
Chemtrails have quickly moved from conspiracy theory to documented fact. So much so, that the
powers-that-be have had to admit to the program, but a beneficial one in their view. Between cloud seeding and possible connections to
HAARP, chemtrail fallout must be considered, especially as it is being conducted nearly worldwide. Rosalind Peterson has been at the
forefront of connecting geoengineering to GMOs as a combined source
for oxygen-depleting algae blooms that very well could affect a wide spectrum of natural systems. Furthermore, some believe that the delivery
system for chemtrails can also disperse pathogens. If there is a flu or disease outbreak in the coming days or weeks among the human
population in areas where the birds have fallen, the chemtrail connection could be made. If this happens, the contagion could be blamed
on a new, deadly bird flu. A last possibility connected to chemtrails would be nanoparticles.
HAARP: Birds and fish can be susceptible to subtle frequency alteration. An interesting YouTube post from a long-time fisherman
mentioned the "pearl" plate behind the eye of
the affected type of drum fish in this event. He made a plea for anyone in the area to look for signs of damage to this plate.
Both birds and fish navigate in highly coordinated ways that indicate that they move and communicate via frequencies. Could the HAARP array in Alaska have short-circuited their navigation
systems? Or, perhaps this is the beginning of a cascading effect from decades of electromagnetic pollution emanating from EMF and ELF
waves shot around the planet via a wide range of modern communications.
Scalar Weapons: These directed energy beam weapons can be deployed via satellite and create a wide range of "natural disasters"
that can be tuned to
certain frequencies. Their radius is reported to be several miles. Even crazier is that we have been told that the dead birds
encountered massive trauma. One of the reported abilities of scalar weapons is to create a Tesla shield of plasma, like a bubble, that could explode anything that enters
its airspace. Some have speculated that this technology is in full operation. But what if it truly is still at the testing
phase? Remember, this is happening in South
Project Blue Beam: Were they testing a sound generator for the global theater of alien invasion? This one is "out there" for
sure, but NASA itself has announced its preparation for such a scenario. Project Blue Beam, like its counterpart
HAARP, uses the natural energy present in the ionosphere as both a visual and acoustical device. Again, perhaps they are not at the
ready stage yet, but, like Tesla, have made an unintentional
Geomagnetic and other Earth changes: As anyone can see from the above range of possibilities, we are facing an array of human
tampering. However, the backdrop to this are the anomalies beginning to take form with the apparent wandering of our magnetic pole, as
even National Geographic
reported that the north magnetic pole is racing toward Russia. Add to this a dwindling magnetosphere and falling oxygen levels, and the
deaths among more delicate species might portend a larger problem. Finally, an increase in sun activity and magnetic storms might be weakening our overall natural habitat.
The widespread die-off of nature should lead us to look more intently at the world around us, and to question our relationship to it, and our
effect upon it. Perhaps this is what we should have been doing all along.
Why did Bernie Madoff go to prison? To make it simple, he talked people into
investing with him. Trouble was, he didn't invest their money. As time rolled on he simply took the money from the new investors to pay
off the old investors. Finally there were too many old investors and not enough money from new investors coming in to keep the payments
Next thing you know Madoff is one of the most hated men in
America and he is off to jail.
Some of you know this. But not enough of you understand the
Madoff did to his investors what the government has been doing to us for over 70 years with Social Security.
There is no meaningful difference between the two schemes, except that one was operated by a private individual who is now in jail,
and the other is operated by politicians who enjoy perks, privileges and status in spite of their actions.
Do you need a
side-by-side comparison here? Well here's a nifty little chart.
Takes money from investors with the promise that the money will be invested and made
available to them later.
Takes money from wage earners with the promise that the money will be invested in a
"Trust Fund" (Lock Box) and made available later.
Instead of investing the money Madoff spends it on nice homes in the Hamptons and
Instead of depositing money in a Trust Fund the politicians transfer it to the
General Revenue Fund and use it for general spending and vote buying.
When the time comes to pay the investors back Madoff simply uses some of the new
funds from newer investors to pay back the older investors.
When benefits for older investors become due the politicians pay them with money
taken from younger and newer wage earners to pay the older geezers.
When Madoff's scheme is discovered all hell breaks loose. New investors
won't give him any more cash.
When Social Security runs out of money the politicians try to force the taxpayers to
send them some more; or they cancel S/S to all those who paid into it.
Bernie Madoff is in jail.
Politicians remain in Washington .. with fat medical and retirement
'The taxpayer: That's someone who
works for the federal government but doesn't have to take the civil service examination.'
~ Ronald Reagan
"If you put the federal government in
charge of the Sahara Desert , in five years there’d be a shortage of sand.”
A bedrock principle of Natural Law (the Law upon which Western Civilization rests) is the primacy of truth. Without a desire for, and
appreciation of, truth, society cannot sustain itself. Lies, deceit, duplicity, etc., are more than moral evils; they are the bane of freedom
and liberty. Take away truth, and one is left without honor, justice, or decency. Truth is the cement that holds the bricks and stones of a
sane and civilized society together. Remove the former and the latter will crumble.
Truth also demands courage and honesty, because sometimes it can be very painful to look at! It takes an honest man to desire truth, as
truth will often reveal the character flaws in his own soul. It also takes courage to appreciate truth, as truth will often demand that one
change his own opinion or conduct. Unfortunately, it does appear that the desire for truth has been replaced with a desire for deceit.
Years ago, a great, old preacher-warrior told my former church congregation, “People today love being lied to.” How right he was! For the
most part, even professing Christian people today love being lied to. It would seem that many people find deceit easier to digest than truth.
Maybe it’s because these people lack the aforementioned virtues of honesty and courage.
Truth demands the virtue of honesty, because honesty requires that information be objectively analyzed and studied; it requires that
personal prejudices and proclivities be set aside; it requires that humility replace pride, which allows one’s opinions and conduct to change
in the face of truth.
Truth also demands courage, as courage is the active response to honesty. To know what is right to do is great (many people do not even
know this much), but to act upon what one knows to be right is even greater–and also harder! Courage gives men the fortitude and
conviction to suffer personal loss in order to be faithful to their own honesty. Courage places more value on honesty and truth than on
personal prosperity or aggrandizement. Courage propelled Daniel into the lion’s den; it drove Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego into the
burning fiery furnace; it placed a youthful David onto the battlefield alone against a fierce and ferocious adversary; it gathered Pastor
Jonas Clark’s congregants (mostly farmers and merchants) onto Lexington Green to face Britain’s highly trained, professional soldiers.
So, where are the virtues of honesty and courage in the desire for truth today? Threaten the average pastor and church leader with some
obscure IRS tax code and they will quickly turn their backs upon virtually every principle of truth and honor that they once professed to
believe. The mere threat of potential financial loss sends men (excuse me, males) scurrying for cover.
In this regard, when then-Senator Lyndon Johnson created the heinous 501(c)3 IRS tax-exempt status for churches, he very cleverly (with
assistance from Hades, I might add) planted the seeds that would grow up to intimidate the vast majority of America’s pastors and church
leaders into becoming silent slaves of the state. In fact, if one has an opportunity to ever bore deeply into the matter, he or she will
discover that most pastors and church leaders today do not even regard the Church as the institution of the living God, bound only to the
laws and principles of God’s Holy Word; they perceive it as a creature of the state, bound to the subjective machinations of IRS bureaucrats
and their toadies in the law profession. And should a choice ever have to be made between the two, God, His Word, and His Church will be
thrown under the bus in preference to the state-owned corporation. So much for truth–or honesty, or courage, for that matter.
The rejection of truth seems ubiquitous in America today. When did it start? Maybe when Abraham Lincoln turned the Constitution on its
head and–at bayonet point–turned republicanism into nationalism; maybe when Woodrow Wilson rejected thousands of years of human
history and turned America’s sound money system over to the corrupt and illegitimate Federal Reserve; maybe when Wilson created the monstrous
Internal Revenue Service; maybe when the 17th Amendment was adopted; maybe when the American media convinced people that Lee Harvey Oswald
acted alone in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy; maybe when the American people (including the vast majority of pastors and
Christians) turned their backs (and their hearts) to the Branch Davidians, who were murdered by federal agents outside Waco, Texas; maybe
when so-called “conservative” Senate Republicans deliberately chose to cover up President Bill Clinton’s criminal conduct; maybe when the
powers that be began demonizing anyone who dared to question the “official” story regarding the events on 9/11/01; maybe when a vast majority
of Christians and conservatives blindly followed and actively supported the unconstitutional, un-American policies of President George W.
Bush. They supported Bush when he threw off Western Civilization’s time-tested Just War doctrine (and replaced it with an unconscionable
Preemptive War policy), and, again, when he officially began turning America into a police state by creating the Department of Homeland
Security, implementing the Military Commissions Act, introducing the Patriot Act, and dismantling Habeus Corpus and Posse Comitatus. Whenever
it started, the sad reality is, America has largely become a nation of truth-rejecters.
There is a passage of Scripture that I simply must interject here: “Because they received not the love of the truth . . . God shall send
them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie.” (II Thess. 2:10,11 KJV)
This is one of God’s universal principles: when people deliberately reject truth, God will allow them to believe lies, which always leads
to ultimate destruction. I submit that is exactly where America is today. As a nation, we have rejected truth, and God is giving us over to
deceit and falsehood. And what is interesting to me is the way in which many unbelievers seem to have a thirst for truth that far surpasses
that of many professing Christians. This leads to an amazing paradox.
Think of it: when God is moving within a nation with His plan of truth and justice (which He is always doing), then it stands to reason
that the evil one is, likewise, resisting and countering God’s plan through deceit and falsehood. This means that those unbelievers who seek
truth are allying themselves with God (maybe even unwittingly), while those professing Christians who have rejected truth are allying
themselves against God (again, maybe even unwittingly). Remember, God called the heathen king, Cyrus, “my shepherd.” (Isa. 44:28) But one
thing is constant: truth is like a magnet: one is always being pulled toward it or away from it, depending upon the polarity of one’s heart
and mind. People who embrace truth tend to embrace it further, while people who reject truth tend to be continually hardened against it.
Think of the conflicts of world and American history where brothers fought against brothers. Many of these brethren died at the hands of
brethren fighting for truth, while other brethren died fighting against truth. And though men may be unable to discern the difference, God
suffers from no such malady. He knows those who enable truth and those who disable it. And many of those today that are resisting and
disabling truth call themselves Christians. There is another appropriate Scripture: “By their fruits ye shall know them.” (Matt. 7:20
Again, the desire for truth is a bedrock principle of a free and independent society. We must desire truth, first, in our own hearts. We
must be willing to objectively analyze our motives and actions based upon this fundamental principle. How can so many people (including
professing Christians) behave so dishonestly? How can they act so cowardly? How is it that truth is only precious when it doesn’t cost us
anything? How can people be so unconcerned about truth and so spiteful toward those who seek it? How can those who claim as their Savior the
One is “the way, the truth, and the life” be so calloused against truth? How can those who claim to read the word of truth (the Bible) be so
ignorant of truth?
Look around you: our society is breaking apart due to a lack of appreciation for truth. Small businesses are being put out of business due
to a lack of truth. Families are being torn apart due to a lack of truth. Churches are filled with bitterness, carnality, envy, deceit,
duplicity, false accusation, greed, and cowardice due to a lack of truth. Our political institutions mock the principles of decency and honor
due to a lack of truth. The national media loves to distort truth; the federal judiciary loves to twist truth; and there is no such thing as
truth to Big Business–only bottom line profits.
As we enter a new year in search of Heaven’s blessing and protection, let us remind ourselves that God always judges people who reject
truth. Always! If we truly want Heaven’s blessing and protection upon our land, we will start–each of us–by being willing to seek
and embrace truth, even if doing so costs us something; because, in reality, people who reject truth lose a whole lot more than whatever they
had hoped to gain. Eventually, they lose, not only their own lives, but also the life of their country.