Click here to submit Tips... contact me... information or news articles you wrote that pertain to this site!
Rare interview with Ross Perot (Sept 27, 2012-MUST WATCH!)
"The risk of some nation taking us over..."
Ross Perot talked with a reporter about the state of the economy and the nation, and the relevance of the issues he ran on in 1992 and 1996 in the 2012 elections, including federal debt and deficit spending, third party presidential runs, and the US education system. David Walker also sat in during the interview. Mr. Walker, a former U.S. comptroller general, had been working with Mr. Perot on initiatives to educate voters about economic issues in 2012 election.
Why are There only 2 Candidates in the Presidential Debates?
It’s only natural that the Democratic incumbent, Barack Obama, and the Republican challenger, Mitt Romney, should participate in tonight’s first presidential debate, but in fact there are two other candidates who qualified for the ballot in enough states that they could, technically, win the election.
Gary Johnson of the Libertarian Party is on the ballot of 48 states and Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party is on 39 state ballots. In a pure democracy it would be considered a given that Johnson and Stein would join Obama and Romney on stage, but in the United States elections don’t work that way. That’s because the three presidential debates are run not by the government, but by a nonprofit organization, the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD). The CPD was created in 1987 by the Democratic and Republican parties as a bipartisan—rather than a nonpartisan—effort.
GAZA CITY – The Qatari government on Tuesday invited tenders for four construction projects, in the first stage of a $254 million project to rebuild the war-torn Gaza Strip.
Qatar’s ambassador to Gaza Muhammad al-Imadi is heading a committee overseeing the work.
Consultants have been invited to submit designs for a city to be named after Sheikh Hamad Ben Khalifa al-Thani. The $30-million development will include 1,000 residential units in five-story apartment blocks, schools, stores, clinics, parks and entertainment facilities, the ambassador said in a statement.
Companies were also invited to bid for the repair of three major roads in the enclave. The 35-kilometer coastal highway al-Rashid Street will cost around $50 million to repair, and $18 million has been allocated to reconstruct the 10-kilometer al-Karama Street.
The 28-kilometer Salah Addin Street will be repaired first, at a cost of $60 million, as the plans and designs are ready, al-Imadi said.
In the coming days, consultants will be invited to bid for several agricultural projects, budgeted at $12.5 million.
Housing projects worth $32 million will also be announced this week to house needy families and to provide houses for new Jewish incomers .
As Spain announces more austerity, the country has erupted in violence. This report, which dives into the heart of the violent protests, reveals a shockingly deep divide between government and people.
"The government is trying to scare the people," one protester says, following the government's dubbing of a protest outside the congress as a possible coup d'etat. It ramped up the already tense mood among a people that blame the right wing government for Spain's economic problems. As protesters refuse to leave and sit down in non-violent protest, the police break off into small groups and chase them down. "The police started to charge indiscriminately toward anyone. We are returning to fascist repression." Rubber bullets and bricks fly back and forth in street exchanges of a shocking intensity. "We are not animals! We are people!", one woman pleads with the police. But the police don't wait long before storming down the streets, shooting rubber bullets at close range into fleeing crowds. The streets may be clear for now, but as the crisis in Spain deepens with no end in sight, popular resistance towards the government and it's austerity project is only intensifying.
WTC7 -- This is an Orange
American Soldiers speak out against the wars and accuse the government of crimes
Russia to liberate the world from US occupation
A State Duma deputy, the head of the Committee on Economic Policy and Entrepreneurship of the Russian State Duma, Yevgeny Fyodorov, told Pravda.Ru of his impressions from visiting the APEC summit in Vladivostok. According to him, the meeting showed that the U.S. gradually loses absolute power in the world economy and politics. The power and influence of other countries, such as Russia and China, grows against such a background.
State Duma deputy, the head of the Committee on Economic Policy and Entrepreneurship of the Russian State Duma Yevgeny Fyodorov:
"APEC is a very interesting and important event, although it seems to be an ordinary one. The leaders get together and discuss important issues, but in reality it is the key event in today's global scenario. With the onset of the global economic crisis,with political and economic turbulence, the APEC is a key event in terms of the demonstration of new vectors of unity of the international community outside the United States.
It is clear that it is not a split - everyone still plays by American rules, but the countries already demonstrate their independence in economic policy. I was there and saw how angry Mrs. Hillary Clinton was when she came from China, where several Chinese leaders - especially those who are to become top officials of China next year - did not even want to meet her. In China, Clinton was told no when she wanted to take on mediator's functions in resolving China's territorial disputes with Asian countries.
She also heard no in response to her requirement to set the yuan rate. It is an annual requirement of the United States to China to set the yuan rate for political reasons to pump resources and opportunities from China to the U.S. It is an additional form of tribute from China, which China had to deal with every year for political motives. Nowadays, the U.S. was refused. The world is changing.
Russian President Vladimir Putin clearly expressed his attitude to the dollar as the world reserve currency. In fact, he offered the countries of the world to start building a large number of regional currencies as an alternative to the reserve system of the dollar. This is a strong step and a strong move, including the initiative to switch to mutual payments. He also said that Russia and China had already switched to the system and he urged other countries to follow the example. This shows that the world begins to change fundamentally, and Russia's role at this point is to become the leader in changing the world. I would say that Putin as the leader of the national liberation movement in Russia, demonstrated himself at the event as a leader and provider of ideas for the world national liberation movement against the system of occupation, which was formed after 1991 not only about Russia but also China and many other countries.
From this point of view, it is the key and turning meeting of the leaders of world's largest economies, which creates conditions to reformat the entire economic system of the world - moving away from the U.S. Do not forget that the U.S. consumes a half the world's GDP, despite the fact that there is only 4.5 percent of the population living there. In other words, they eat ten times as much as compared to the citizens of all other countries. And they eat at the expense of China, Russia, India, Brazil - all other countries.
Today, the world begins to unite against the colonizer - USA. For the time being, it is a conceptual and preparatory process, but it takes place. In this regard, I would call the preliminary results of the meeting in the Far East the meeting of the future members of the world national liberation movement to free the world from the U.S. occupation.
Israel's nuclear weapons render it ineligible for US aid
By Grant Smith
The Israel lobby’s biggest and longest-running Washington
boondoggles are the massive annual weapons and economic packages to
Israel. Tightly coordinated campaign contributors (both
individuals and political action committees) and the Israeli
government’s own quiet demands manifest themselves within
AIPAC-drafted foreign aid legislation. The U.S.-Israel
Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012 forces Americans to
fork hard-earned tax dollars over to Israel’s coffers on the
pretext that it is in eminent danger. Yet declassified
documents reveal that even the current prime minister once
worked inside the state’s clandestine nuclear arms smuggling
rings. Transferring foreign aid to the Middle East’s sole
nuclear weapons state — which can obviously take care of
itself — is not just unseemly and unnecessary. It is illegal.
available tax return [.pdf] reveals it has now become as
seamlessly linked to its foreign principal as its parent
organization — the American Zionist Council — was when it
was finally ordered by the Kennedy administration to openly
register as an Israeli foreign agent in 1962. AIPAC spent
$1,541,572 maintaining its Jerusalem office. The office, led by
Wendy Senor Singer, is described as the official
location for daily meetings with senior Israeli government
officials. It is also used to coordinate the visits of supplicant
U.S. politicians with funding from a mysterious captive
charity of no employees claiming to be an educational
organization [.pdf]. The Israeli government’s desires are
seamlessly transcribed into legislation at AIPAC’s
headquarters in Washington — raising the perennial question why AIPAC is not registering as Israel’s foreign agent.
In relation to the sheer volume of American taxpayer dollars it
transfers to Israel, on paper AIPAC is a rather thinly-funded and
top-heavy organization. In its latest schedule of contributors,
filed in late April and just obtained by special request from the IRS,
AIPAC reported that only 1,949 individual contributors provided 61%
of its $64 million in total contributions and grants.* The
top-tier donors each gave on average $20,206, with the top donor
chipping in an impressive $6,610,181.
Although contributions to 501(c)(4) organizations like AIPAC are
not tax-deductible, corporations and partnerships can write off
contributions as a business expense. One AIPAC donor, an attorney
in New York City whose confidential data the IRS didn’t
successfully scrub, presumably paid AIPAC with funds from his law
partnership, which AIPAC listed as the contributor’s
AIPAC claims in mandatory disclosures filed with the clerk of
the House of Representatives over the same time period that it spent
approximately 4% of its total budget on actual lobbying. AIPAC’s
core lobbying mission hasn’t changed much since AIPAC’s
founder left his
Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs post in New York in 1951.
Isaiah Kenen’s mission was to obtain U.S.-taxpayer-funded
weapons and aid by lobbying from a Jewish
Agency funded front group of “concerned Americans”
rather than working openly as Israel’s officially registered
foreign agent. In Kenen’s day, Israel first obtained massive
amounts of surplus WWII conventional weapons simply by stealing
or purchasing [.pdf] them to be scrapped and instead smuggling
them from the United States in violation of the Arms Export Control
and Neutrality Acts. The smuggling networks were established and
funded by small numbers of wealthy Zionists who were curiously
immune from criminal prosecution. When less enfranchised citizens
later demanded warranted prosecutions, the Justice Department simply
ignored them, establishing a policy that has held fast to
the present day.
The AIPAC-sponsored U.S.-Israel
Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012, signed into law by
President Obama on July 27, 2012, makes unprecedented demands on U.S.
taxpayers and diplomats. It mandates American economic largess to
Israel via high technology, agriculture, medicine,
health, pharmaceutical, and energy transfers. It demands funding for Israel
Aerospace Industries (a corporation only recently
linked to Israeli espionage activities against the U.S.) missile-defense programs and air-refueling tankers and munitions Israel
could use to unilaterally set off a wider war with Iran. Israel
even won a detour of used weapons from U.S. forces departing Iraq.
The aid law extends already generous loan guarantees to Israel.
However, the package also requires the U.S. president to issue
to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and House Committee on
Foreign Affairs a report on the status of Israel’s
“qualitative military edge” by Jan. 23, 2013. It is
finally time for some hard truths. An honest presidential response
to this AIPAC-mandated reporting rider would wipe clean all current
and future U.S.-taxpayer-funded obligations to Israel. A truthful
presidential assessment would finally tell the American people the following:
“Israel has deployed a clandestine nuclear arsenal with some
and materials stolen
from the United States. Our foreign aid laws therefore make Israel
ineligible for further taxpayer dollars.”
Such a truthful declaration would turn the tables on AIPAC and
its small group of donors now pushing Americans to steal from
themselves by systematically violating the Symington
and Glenn amendments to U.S. foreign aid laws. Ending aid would
disentangle unwitting Americans from Israel’s unending
conflicts, illegal settlements, systematized abuse of Palestinians,
and clandestine nuclear proliferation in the Middle East.
in 2011, in previous years AIPAC filed contributor schedules
with the IRS that improperly listed only two donor entries. After
numerous complaints were made to the IRS, AIPAC has apparently been
forced to again file proper schedules listing every contributor
donating more than $5,000.
“The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance…it is the illusion of knowledge.”
A thought-provoking and powerful documentary film on the current and historical root causes of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Unlike any other film ever produced on the conflict — ‘Occupation 101' presents a comprehensive analysis of the facts and hidden truths surrounding the never ending controversy and dispels many of its long-perceived myths and misconceptions.
The film also details life under Israeli military rule, the role of the United States in the conflict, and the major obstacles that stand in the way of a lasting and viable peace. The roots of the conflict are explained through first-hand on-the-ground experiences from leading Middle East scholars, peace activists, journalists, religious leaders and humanitarian workers whose voices have too often been suppressed in American media outlets.
The film covers a wide range of topics — which include — the first wave of Jewish immigration from Europe in the 1880's, the 1920 tensions, the 1948 war, the 1967 war, the first Intifada of 1987, the Oslo Peace Process, Settlement expansion, the role of the United States Government, the second Intifada of 2000, the separation barrier and the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, as well as many heart wrenching testimonials from victims of this tragedy. (Excerpt from main website)
Please visit the official website for more information:
In 1957, a 1,168 page book by Ayn Rand, called Atlas Shrugged, was published. According to one source, Rand was alleged to be a mistress to Philippe Rothschild, who instructed her to write the book in order to show that through the raising of oil prices, then destroying the oil fields and shutting down the coal mines, the Illuminati would take over the world. It also related how they would blow up grain mills, derail trains, bankrupt and destroy their own companies, till they had destroyed the economy of the entire world; and yet, they would be so wealthy, that it would not substantially affect their vast holdings. The novel is about a man who stops the motor of the world, of what happens when "the men of the mind, the intellectuals of the world, the originators and innovators in every line of industry go on strike; when the men of creative ability in every profession, in protest against regulation, quit and disappear."
If we are to believe that the book represents the Illuminati's plans for the future, then the following excerpts may provide some insight to the mentality of the elitists who are preparing us for one-world government.
In my last column, “A Culture of Delusion,” I wrote that “Americans live in a matrix of lies. Lies dominate every policy discussion, every political decision.” This column will use two top news stories, Iranian nukes and Julian Assange, to illustrate how lies become “truth.”
The western Presstitute media uses every lie to demonize the Iranian government. On September 28 in a fit of unmitigated ignorance, the UK rag, Mail Online, called the president of Iran a “dictator.” The Iranian presidency is an office filled by popular election, and the authority of the office is subordinate to the ayatollahs. Assange is demonized alternatively as a rapist and a spy.
Last week the news was dominated by the non-existent but virtually real Iranian nuclear weapons program. The Israeli prime minister, Netanyahu, blatantly intervened in the US presidential election, demanding that Obama specify the “red line” for attacking Iran.
Netanyahu believes his maximum leverage over Obama, the president of the “world’s only superpower,” is just prior to the election. Israel cannot attack Iran on its own without the risk of Israel’s destruction. But Netanyahu reasons that if he attacks Iran the week before the US election, Obama will have to join in or lose the Jewish vote for not supporting Israel in states such as Florida, which has a large Jewish population and many electoral votes. If the election is close, Netanyahu, a person consumed by arrogance and hubris, might exercise his threat and attack Iran, despite the opposition of former chiefs of Israeli intelligence and military, the opposition party, and a majority of the Israeli people.
In other words, the outcome of the “superpower’s” presidential election might depend upon whether the sitting president of the “superpower” is sufficiently obedient to the crazed Israeli prime minister.
That the outcome of the US presidential election could depend upon the agenda of the prime minister of a tiny country that exists only because of US financial, military, and diplomatic support, especially the UN veto, should disturb those Americans who think that they are the “indispensable people.” How indispensable are you when you have to do what the Israeli prime minister wants?
The US media makes certain that this question never enters american minds. Americans have been told that if Iran doesn’t have nukes, it has a nuke weapons program. This is what the politicians of both parties, the media, and the Israel Lobby tell them. Americans are told this despite the facts that the CIA and the National Intelligence Estimate stick to the conclusion that Iran abandoned its flirtation with a nuclear weapon in 2003 and the International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors on the ground in Iran report no evidence or a nuclear weapons program and no evidence of any diversion of enriched uranium to a weapons program.
Moreover, what could Iran do with a nuclear weapon, other than use it against an aggressor? Any offensive use would result in Iran’s destruction.
Why do Americans believe Iran has nukes or is making nukes when the CIA says they are not? The answer is that Netanyahu says so, and the elected members of the US government in the House, Senate, and White House are afraid to contradict the Israeli prime minister, as are the American print and TV media. Some “superpower” we are! The “indispensable people” have to grovel in the dirt before Netanyahu. Americans are not even aware of their shame.
Iran, unlike Israel, signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. Signatories to the treaty have the right to nuclear energy. Nuclear energy requires a low level of enrichment, 5% or less. The minute Iran announced a nuclear energy program, the Israeli government and its prostitutes in Washington lied that Iran was building a bomb. For exercising its legal rights under the treaty, Iran has been painted as a rouge criminal state and demonized..
A nuclear weapon requires 95% enrichment. To get to 5% from scratch and then to 95% is a long drawn out process. I think I first started hearing Israeli government claims of an Iranian nuke back in he 1990s of last century.
When Iran announced that, in view of the sanctions imposed by the US, sanctions that affect medical supplies, Iran was going to enrich uranium to 20% in order to supply itself with medical isotopes, the Israeli allegations that this would lead to a bomb resulted in Iran saying that the Iranian government was content for France or some other country to supply their medical isotopes and would not pursue enrichment beyond energy requirements. The US and Russia were also mentioned as suppliers.
On Israel’s orders Washington vetoed the Iranian concession. Solving the problem is not what the Israeli government wants. The problem has to be kept alive so that it can be used to foment an attack on Iran.
The Iranian nuke is one of those grand hoaxes, a lie designed to hide the real agenda.
What is the real agenda?
The real agenda hiding behind the hysterical concern about an Iranian nuke, is the rightwing Israeli government’s design on the water resources of southern Lebanon.
Twice the Israeli government sent the Israeli army into southern Lebanon to occupy and eventually annex the territory. And twice Hizbollah defeated and drove out the vaunted Israeli army.
The few thousand Hizbollah fighters were able to defeat the Israeli army, which is equipped and supplied by US taxpayers’ dollars while Americans are foreclosed out of their homes and left unemployed as Washington applauds the offshoring of their jobs, because Syria and Iran provide Hizbollah with financial support and weapons that destroy Israeli tanks.
Syria, of course, is currently resisting its destruction by Israel and its american puppet state. The overthrow of Syria hasn’t gone well, because the Russians and Chinese didn’t go along with it, like they stupidly did in Libya. But the far rightwing Israeli government has concluded that with american prestige involved in the overthrow of the Assad government in Syria, the deed will be done.
That leaves Iran. The Israeli government knows that it cannot be forthright and say that it wants Americans to go to war with Iran so that Israel can steal southern Lebanon. But if fear over nonexistent nukes can muster the Western populations to support an attack on Iran, Iran can be eliminated as Hizbollah’s supplier, and Israel can steal the water from Lebanon.
There is no discussion whatsoever of the real agenda anywhere in the US print and TV media. I doubt there is any discussion anywhere in Europe, which is a collection of american puppet states.
Will we get World War III for Christmas? Possibly, if the US election is close as it approaches. If the election is too close to call, Netanyahu might throw the dice and rely on Obama following his lead. Iran will be attacked, and the consequences are unknowable.
Let’s turn to Julian Assange and Wikileaks. Like Iran, Assange has been demonized, not on the basis of facts but on the basis of lies.
Washington, which poses as a purveyor of human rights, has been mistreating if not torturing Bradley Manning since May 2010 without bringing him to trial in an effort to make Manning say that he and Assange constitute a spy team working against the US.
Assange is a celebrity, because Wikileaks publishes the news leaked to the organization that the Presstitute media suppresses. While in Sweden, Assange was picked up by two celebrity-hungry women who took him home to their beds. The women later bragged of their conquests on social media, but apparently when they found out that they were rivals, they turned on the “two-timer” Assange and made charges. One claimed that he had not used a condom as per her request, and the other claimed that she had offered one helping but he had taken two.
Whatever the accusations, the Swedish prosecutorial office investigated and dismissed the case.
Despite this known fact, the Western Presstitute media reports that Assange is a fugitive evading rape charges by hiding in the Ecuadoran Embassy in London. Even RT, an alternative media voice, has fallen for this disinformation.
After Assange was cleared in Sweden, a female prosecutor has tried to reopen the case. There is no evidence for her to bring charges, so she demanded that England arrest Assange and extradite him to Sweden to be questioned.
Normally, people are not subject to extradition for questioning. Only people who have been formally charged are extradited. But this detail wasn’t of interest to the Presstitute media or to the British courts which ruled as Washington desired.
Opinions vary as to whether the female prosecutor who wants Assange for questioning is an ideological feminist who believes no heterosexual sex is legitimate or whether she is in the pay of Washington. But experts agree that once Assange is in Sweden he is certain to be turned over to Washington, which will demand his extradition on trumped up charges. Extradition on trumped up charges is difficult in England but easy in Sweden.
Assange offered to be questioned in London, but the female prosecutor refused. Now the Ecuadoran Embassy is offering to send Assange to the Ecuadoran Embassy in Sweden to be questioned, but Washington, London, and the Swedish prosecutor have refused. They want Assange without the protection of the asylum that Ecuador has granted him.
Assange is Washington’s enemy, because he let the truth get out. WikiLeaks is a journalistic enterprise, not a spy enterprise. It publishes information, some of which is leaked to it by whistleblowers, just as the Pentagon Papers were leaked to the New York Times. The information leaked to WikiLeaks has embarrassed Washington, because it shows Washington to be two-faced, a manipulator of other countries’ governments and medias, and overflowing with mendacity.
In other words, Washington is not the light upon the hill but the gates of Hell or Mordor.
Assange had best be careful. If he again speaks to supportive crowds from a balcony of the Ecuadoran Embassy in London, he is likely to be shot down by a CIA sniper.
Approved by Obama, of course. Or his successor.
Revealed: Army scientists secretly sprayed St Louis with 'radioactive' particles for YEARS to test chemical warfare technology
The United States Military conducted top secret experiments on the citizens of St. Louis, Missouri, for years, exposing them to radioactive compounds, a researcher has claimed.
While it was known that the government sprayed 'harmless' zinc cadmium silfide particles over the general population in St Louis, Professor Lisa Martino-Taylor, a sociologist at St. Louis Community College, claims that a radioactive additive was also mixed with the compound.
She has accrued detailed descriptions as well as photographs of the spraying which exposed the unwitting public, predominantly in low-income and minority communities, to radioactive particles.
Obama Orders Investigation of Post 9/11 Anthrax Attacks STOPPED!!!
Jury Clears Minnesota Farmer of Raw Milk Charges
In what his attorney called “a huge victory for food freedom,” a Minnesota farmer was acquitted by a jury of the “crime” of distributing unpasteurized milk to members of a food cooperative.
On September 20, “after a three-day trial and more than four hours of deliberation,” reported the Minneapolis Star Tribune, “a Hennepin County jury found Alvin Schlangen not guilty of three misdemeanor counts of selling unpasteurized milk, operating without a food license and handling adulterated or misbranded food.” Each count carried a maximum sentence of three months’ imprisonment.
“Schlangen, an organic egg farmer from Freeport, Minn., doesn’t produce milk himself but operates Freedom Farms Co-op, a private club with roughly 130 members who buy various farm products, including raw milk,” the paper explained. “Schlangen picks up the milk products from an Amish farm and delivers them to members.”
“The charges are based on commerce and there’s no commerce here,” the 54-year-old Schlangen told the Star Tribune. “It’s a completely different food system than what we are accustomed to.”
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — Western nations and allies in the Middle East meet Friday to urge Syria's fractured opposition to unite, seeking a new path for ending the country's conflict amid deadlock between major powers on the U.N. Security Council.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was hosting talks among the Friends of Syria — a coalition which includes the United States, the European Union and the Arab League — on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly, seeking to encourage better cooperation among groups which oppose Syrian President Bashar Assad.
The talks, which don't include Russia, China or Iran, take place with the Security Council at a stalemate on efforts to halt the 18-month long conflict, which activists say has led to more than 30,000 deaths.
America's deadly double tap drone attacks are 'killing 49 people for every known terrorist in Pakistan'
Study found war against violent Islamists has become increasingly deadly
Researchers blame common tactic now being used – the 'double-tap' strike
Drone strikes condemned for their ineffectiveness in targeting militants
Just one in 50 victims of America’s deadly drone strikes in Pakistan are terrorists – while the rest are innocent civilians, a new report claimed today.
The authoritative joint study, by Stanford and New York Universities, concludes that men, women and children are being terrorised by the operations ’24 hours-a-day’.
And the authors lay much of the blame on the use of the ‘double-tap’ strike where a drone fires one missile – and then a second as rescuers try to drag victims from the rubble. One aid agency said they had a six-hour delay before going to the scene.
The tactic has cast such a shadow of fear over strike zones that people often wait for hours before daring to visit the scene of an attack. Investigators also discovered that communities living in fear of the drones were suffering severe stress and related illnesses. Many parents had taken their children out of school because they were so afraid of a missile-strike.
Iran Optimizes S-200 Missile Shield to Hit High, Mid-Altitude Targets
TEHRAN (FNA)- Iranian defense experts are modifying certain features of S-200 anti-aircraft missile system to give it a dual use to hit both high and mid-altitude targets, Commander of Khatam ol-Anbia Air Defense Base Brigadier General Farzad Esmayeeli announced.
"Following the current changes underway by our experts, S-200 will be able to hit mid-altitude threats in addition to high-altitude targets soon," Esmayeeli told FNA on Friday.
He underlined that the optimization of the S-200 anti-aircraft missile system makes the country needless of deploying other mid-altitude missile systems like Mersad and Raad in places possibly threatened by enemy aircrafts flying in mid altitude.
Esmayeeli added that this modified version of S-200 will soon have a new name too.
In similar remarks in July 2011, Esmayeeli had announced that the country's experts have been able to optimize the Russian-made S-200 anti-aircraft missile system so well that the Iranian version of the system has stunned Russian experts.
In November 2010, Iran successfully test-fired its sophisticated S-200 anti-aircraft missile systems.
Iran's S-200 system is a very long range, medium-to-high altitude surface-to-air missile (SAM) system designed to defend large areas from bomber attack or other strategic aircrafts. Each battalion has 6 single-rail missile launchers and fire control radar. It can be linked to other, longer-range radar systems.
Each missile is launched by 4 solid-fueled strap-on rocket boosters. Maximum range is between 200 and 350 km depending on the model. The missile uses radio illumination mid-course correction to fly towards the target with a terminal semi active radar homing phase.
China is creating its own military-industrial complex, with the private sector taking a leading role.
2012-09-24 — When China turned to Russia for supplies of advanced weapons through the 1990s, it kick-started Beijing’s military buildup with an immediate boost in firepower.
It also demonstrated the failure of its domestic defence sector, which was still turning out obsolete 1950s vintage equipment for the People’s Liberation Army from a sprawling network of state-owned arms makers.
Now, after more than two decades of soaring military spending, this once backward industry has been transformed – China is creating its own military-industrial complex, with the private sector taking a leading role.
With Tiananmen-era bans on Western military sales to China still in place, an innovative and efficient domestic arms industry is crucial for Beijing as it assembles a modern military force capable of enforcing claims over Taiwan and disputed maritime territories.
China has locked horns recently with its southeast Asian neighbours over conflicting claims to strings of islets in the South China Sea.
Tensions have also flared with Japan over uninhabited islands in the East China Sea, even as the United States executes a strategic military pivot toward the Pacific.
Well-funded defence groups have rapidly absorbed the technology and expertise needed to build complex weapons, freeing China from its former heavy reliance on Russian and other foreign equipment, Chinese and Western experts say.
“A country’s defence sector should reflect the strength of the country’s economy,” said Wu Da, a portfolio manager at Beijing-based Changsheng Fund Management Co Ltd, which invests in listed Chinese defence stocks.
But, he added, the sector is so shrouded in secrecy it’s been hard to assess how viable it is.
“Some of the Chinese defence groups are already quite strong after so much military spending in recent years but you don’t know exactly how well they are doing financially or technologically because China does not want others to know.”
That could start to change.
Beijing is enlisting the private sector to accelerate the rise of its best defence contractors, issuing new guidelines in July aimed at encouraging private investment in a sector traditionally sheltered from competition and public scrutiny.
Listed subsidiaries of top Chinese military contractors now intend to buy at least $3.15 billion US in assets from their state-owned parents in the second half, according to their recent filings with the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges.
This would double the value of military-related assets injected into these listed companies since 2007 with more in the pipeline, as Beijing presses ahead with an ambitious pro-gram to privatize most of a vast arms industry employing more than a million workers at more than 1,000 state-owned enterprises.
The long-term goal is to trans-form some of the leading con-tractors, such as China State Shipbuilding Corporation, Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) and China Aero-space Science and Industry Corporation into homegrown versions of American giants Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman or Britain’s BAE Systems.
AVIC, which is aiming to quadruple its sales to $157.7 billion US by 2020 from $39.6 billion US (250 billion yuan) in 2011, plans to inject 80 per cent of its main businesses into some of its listed companies by the end of next year.
Beijing has made repeated calls to speed up listings of all but the most sensitive military businesses. The authorities have also promised to allow public bid-ding for unclassified and minor defence contracts in a sector that is likely to enjoy strong growth if China continues its sustained military buildup.
China’s top 10 defence groups with estimated combined assets of $315 billion US have listed more than 70 subsidiaries, including over 40 with defence-related businesses. About 25 per cent of the assets of the top 10 are now held in the listed companies, according to market analysts.
Some of these stocks have been strong performers. Sustained military outlays and the expectation of asset injections have insulated them from the country’s current economic slowdown. They also tend to spike in price at times of increased tension between China and its neighbours over disputed territory.
The plan to buy more of their parent’s military-related assets would allow these listed companies to raise extra funds for research and development, the companies say.
AVIC subsidiary Hafei Aviation Industry Co Ltd plans to issue shares this year to buy $520.5 million US in assets from its parent, including helicopter manufacturing companies.
“AVIC’s injection of (its) helicopter business into the listed company will be a key experiment of China’s strategic upgrade and transformation of its domestic defence and science industry,” Hafei said in a July prospectus.
The growth of the domes-tic arms industry has allowed China to steadily reduce military imports. International arms transfer figures from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) show China’s defence imports fell 58 per cent between 2007 and 2011.
In this period, China slipped to fourth place in the ranks of global arms buyers after holding top position in the five years to 2006.
“The PLA has clearly turned away from acquiring foreign developed platforms,” said Scott Harold, a China analyst for Rand Corporation, based in Santa Monica, Calif.
After double-digit annual increases in outlays over most of the last 20 years, China’s military spending is now second only to the United States.
UN adopts Russian version of resolution on human rights
The UN Human Rights Council has adopted a Russia version of a resolution on human rights, the Russian Foreign Ministry said on Thursday.
Among other things, the document underscores the role of family, society and education establishments in maintaining human rights values that should be promoted by the international community.
The co-authors of the resolution include representatives of more than 60 countries, including members of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the Arab League.
Voting against the Russian version of the resolution were the United States and the European Union.
A group of Syrian rebels from the Free Syrian Army (FSA) defected and joined pro-government forces on Wednesday. The troops’ commander announced that “the road is open,” and called on to other rebels to abandon their uprising.
Eleven rebel troops – three officers, two warrant officers and six civilians – defected from the FSA and now support President Bashar al-Assad, AFP reported.
"We have decided to return to the army and cooperate with the Ministry of National Reconciliation," Lieutenant-Colonel Khaled Abdel Rahman al-Zamel said during a conference of non-combatant Syrian opposition groups.