Welcome to Thetruthnews.info

Beware this is a fact and needs to be stopped now! call your Congressman email this to everyone.

I personally in the state of California was told do not mention the U.S. Constitution in this court room

John Vodila

 

What Does The Gold-Fringed Flag Signify?

It is commonplace to see a gold-fringed United States flag standing in the
present-day courtrooms. Is the gold fringe there for decoration only, or
does it signify a certain jurisdiction? Make no mistake about it -- the
American People have been put on notice that the normal constitutional
functions of government have been suspended and that their Land has been placed under martial law. The information below is not by any means exhaustive, but will at least point the reader in the right direction to do additional research on his own.

Flags


GOLD FRINGED FLAG
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flag.htm


The flags displayed in State courts and courts of the United States have gold or yellow fringes. That is your WARNING that you are entering into a foreign enclave, the same as if you are stepping into a foreign embassy and you will be under the jurisdiction of that flag. The flag with the gold or yellow fringe has no constitution, no laws, and no rules of court, and is not recognized by any nation on the earth, and is foreign to you and the United States of America. more information

MILITARY FLAG WITH THE GOLD FRINGE

Martial Law Flag "Pursuant to 4 U.S.C. chapter 1, §§1, 2, & 3; Executive Order 10834, August 21, 1959; 24 F.R.6865; a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE border on three sides. The President of the United States designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the military. The placing of a fringe on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag and the arrangement of the stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but are within the discretion of the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy." 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 83.

President, Dwight David Eisenhower, by Executive Order No.10834, signed on August 21, 1959 and printed in the Federal Register at 24 F.R. 6865, pursuant to law, stated that: "A military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a yellow fringe border on three sides."

THE LAW OF THE FLAG

The Law of the Flag, an International Law, which is recognized by every nation of the planet, is defined as:

"... a rule to the effect that a vessel is a part of the territory of the nation whose flag she flies. The term is used to designate the RIGHTS under which a ship owner, who sends his vessel into a foreign port, gives notice by his flag to all who enter into contracts with the ship master that he intends the Law of that Flag to regulate those contracts, and that they must either submit to its operation or not contract with him or his agent at all." Ref.: Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41

By the doctrine of "four cornering" the flag establishes the law of the country that it represents. For example, the embassies of foreign countries, in Washington D.C., are "four cornered" by walls or fencing, creating an "enclave." Within the boundaries of the "enclave" of the foreign embassy, the flag of that foreign country establishes the jurisdiction and law of that foreign country, which will be enforced by the Law of the Flag and international treaty. If you enter an embassy, you will be subject to the laws of that country, just as if you board a ship flying a foreign flag, you will be subject to the laws of that flag, enforceable by the "master of the ship," (Captain), by the law of the flag.

When you enter a courtroom displaying a gold or yellow fringed flag, you have just entered into a foreign country, and you better have your passport with you, because you may not be coming back to the land of the free for a long time. The judge sitting under a gold or yellow fringe flag becomes the "captain" or "master" of that ship or enclave and he has absolute power to make the rules as he goes. The gold or yellow fringe flag is your warning that you are leaving your Constitutionally secured RIGHTS on the floor outside the door to that courtroom.

This is exactly why so many judges are appointed, and not elected by the people. The Federal judges are appointed by the President, the national military commander in chief. The State judges are appointed by the Governors, the state military commanders. The judges are appointed because the courts are military courts and civilians do not "elect" military officers.

Under martial law, you are presumed guilty until proven innocent.

The gold-fringed flag only stands inside military courts that sit in summary court martial proceedings against civilians and such courts are governed in part by local rules, but more especially by "The Manual of Courts Martial", U.S., 1994 Ed., at Art. 99, (c)(1)(b), pg. IV-34, PIN 030567-0000, U.S. Government Printing Office, Wash. D.C. The details of the crimes that civilians can commit, that are classed as 'Acts of War,' cover 125 pages in the Manual of Courts Martial.

Under Article IV, section 3, of the Constitution for the united States of America, no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State. So -- Why have the judges of the State and Federal courts been allowed to erect foreign enclaves within our public courthouses under a foreign flag with the yellow fringe upon the soil of your state?

We just thought you would like to know, so that the next time you see this yellow fringed flag you will know what you are looking at and what it really means. If you are in Spain and you see the National Flag of Spain, you would know that you are under the jurisdiction of Spain; and their laws govern you at this time. You are officially NOTICED when you see their flag. This is an admiralty law that says that all who see this flag understand they are governed by the laws of the country that this flag represents. You SHOULD understand that the gold or yellow fringed flag signifies the same thing. It is a notice to you that you are under the rules and regulations of the military force that is flying that flag.

Are you familiar with martial law?

Does your attorney understand what this flag means?

"It is an elementary rule of pleading, that a plea to the jurisdiction is a tacit (silent) admission that the court has a right to judge the case and is a waiver to all exception to the jurisdiction."(Girty v. Logan, 6 Bush KY, 8)

http://www.title4flags.com/flags.htm

Yellow Fringed Admiralty Flag
http://www.alltheweb.com/search?cat=web&cs=iso-8859-1&q=Yellow+Fringed+Admiralty+Flag&_sb_lang=en

Fringe On The U.S. Flag What Does It Mean?
http://user.icx.net/~drherb/fringe.html

United States Executive Order 10834
http://fotw.vexillum.com/flags/us-exord.html

Patriots are subjected to much ridicule when they object to [Admiralty flag] the flag that appears in every government office and courtroom in the land.
That flag is the United States flag... with one seemingly minor cosmetic
difference - a knotted golden fringe on three sides.

Government officials and judges adamantly refuse requests to remove the gold fringed flag and replace it with the constitutional flag of the United States as defined in 4 U.S.C. Section 1,2, and 3 - which has NO fringe.

Why should anyone be concerned about this apparently innocent decorative feature? What difference does it make?

GO HERE FOR THE REST OF THE STORY:
Fringe On The U.S. Flag What Does It Mean?

 

/////////////////////////

corruption chronicles.com

January 05, 2007
National Guard Attacked Near Mexico Border
Armed Mexican drug smugglers ransacked a National Guard unit in the Arizona desert this week, contradicting immigrant advocates’ portrait of a U.S.-Mexico border crossed only by humble and desperate migrants in pursuit of the American dream.

The attack took place late at night in a portion of the Arizona-Mexico border near Nogales that is well known as a drug corridor. In fact, the 120-mile stretch of desert is the U.S. Border Patrol Tucson sector’s busiest for drug seizures. Last year alone, 124,000 pounds of narcotics were confiscated in the area.

Evidently aware that the U.S. National Guard is helping the overwhelmed Border Patrol man these remote portions of the border, the violent Mexican drug smugglers used force to assure their cargo made it safely into the country. The National Guardsmen were forced to retreat and eventually, the attackers scrambled back into Mexico.

This is not the first time these sophisticated Mexican drug cartels use force to penetrate the United States. In fact, they often team up with members of the Mexican military and criminal gangs to assure their valuable goods make it into the country. Sometimes they get individuals, supposedly pursuing a better life in America, to carry smaller loads in backpacks.

Hundreds of incursions by the Mexican military have been documented in the southern border since the late 1990s, with Border Patrol agents and local law enforcement officers regularly coming under gunfire attack. For years federal government officials denied the invasions, but fed up law enforcement officials in Texas took photos and provided other evidence.

Posted by at January 5, 2007 10:51 AM

Comments
I hope the pink panty wearing Guardsmen on that post didn't wet their pants as they retreated from the Mexican invasion force. There was a time in this country when we had actual MEN that would stand and fight. Now is the time for the world to attack the U.S., we have no one left to fight and win a battle. Does anyone know the Mexican national anthem? No, you better learn it soon!

Posted by: Michael Kruszynski at January 5, 2007 12:06 PM

 

Judicial Watch Uncovers New Documents Detailing Mexican Government Incursions

Judicial watch

(Washington, DC)  Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has obtained records from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) that document 226 incursions by Mexican government personnel into the United States between 1996 and 2005.  Released to Judicial Watch on August 28th in response to a November 1, 2005 FOIA request, the records consist of annual intelligence summaries of "Mexican Government Incidents," compiled over a nine year period.  They were designated as "limited official use" by the DHS, requiring "special protection against unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure."

 

The intelligence summaries, which can be accessed via Judicial Watch's Internet site, Judicial watch, provide detailed maps of the incursions, along with descriptions of other documented "incidents" involving Mexican government personnel and Border Patrol agents.  The records describe incidents involving shots fired on both sides of the border, unmarked helicopters invading U.S. airspace, drug smuggling, and confrontations between U.S. Border Patrol agents and armed members of the Mexican military.  Among the highlights:

 

MEXICAN MILITARY ENCOUNTER (ARMED/THREATENING) RIO GRANDE VALLEY/BROWNSVILLE - "As the boat proceeded to go down river towards the scene, the [Border Patrol] Agent on board advised via radio that several Mexican soldiers were pointing their rifles in his direction.  The Agent decided for his safety and the safety of the crew to turn back, but advised that the soldiers were still aiming at them."  (2005)
 

MEXICAN MILITARY SIGHTING - TUCSON/DOUGLAS STATION - "The [Border Patrol] Agents were returning to their assigned area when they heard four distinct gunshots coming from Mexico.  The gunshots were fired when the Agents were approximately 10 feet away."  (2005)
 

MEXICAN MILITARY SIGHTING (ARMED) LAREDO/ZAPATA:  "This boat, which appeared to be a Mexican Military boat, was providing security and escort for the two others that were later found to be transporting 2,716.53 pounds of Marijuana." (2003)
"These documents show the chaotic and dangerous situation at our nation's border with Mexico," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.  "It seems as if, once again, the government is failing to secure our border."

 

 

Hundreds Outside the Capitol Demand Impeachment as Congress Opens 

World   can't wait

Washington, DC, 1/4/07:  As the new Democratic majority started its first day in Congress, with no plans to end the war, repeal the Military Commissions Act or Patriot Act, and numerous declarations that "impeachment is off the table", real oppostion to the Bush regime took place outside the Capitol building.


Close to 400 people rallied outside in a protest demanding "BUSH MUST GO: If war crimes, torture, and crimes against humanity are not reason to impeach, what is?"  The rally put a clear demand before the new Congress and a challenge to the American people: that the Bush regime cannot be allowed to stay in office and commit further crimes.

Speakers at the rally reflected a diverse array of views united in the the demand to impeach Bush for war crimes, and included: Anita Anderson-Dennis, the mother of Darrell Anderson, Iraq War Veteran/Resister; Elaine Brower, World Can't Wait; Steve Cramer, co-chair, Green Party of the United States; Wayne Lum, United For Lt. Watada; Captain Ron Fisher, United States Navy (Retired); Paul Magno, Torture Abolition and Survivors Support Coalition; Ray McGovern; Statement sent from Cynthia McKinney; Kalonji Olusegun, Vice President of the Provisional Government of the Republic of New Afrika; Andy Shallal, Iraqi Voices for Peace; Cindy Sheehan, Gold Star Families for Peace; David Swanson, After Downing Street; Sunsara Taylor, World Can't Wait Advisory Board and writer for Revolution newspaper; Joan Stallard, Code Pink; Rev. Lennox Yearwood, Hip Hop Caucus; Christine Yorty, new Steering Committee member of UFPJ; and Kevin Zeese, Democracy Rising.

Over 50 people at the rally wore orange jumpsuits and black hoods to represent the detainees held indefinitely and tortured at Guantanamo Bay, which Congress made legal with the Military Commissions Act this past fall.  A march took off down the sidewalk and around various government buildings, with a chain of people in orange jumpsuits each holding a giant letter spelling out "THE WORLD CAN'T WAIT - DRIVE OUT THE BUSH REGIME".  This got the attention of everyone it passed, from government employees, cab drivers waving in support, to all manner of DC police.

This rally was exactly the right way to start the new year - refusing to allow passivity to set in after a Democratic victory that only promises to let the Bush regime continue its unjust war, torture, police state measures, moves toward theocracy, and more.  Indeed, this whole direction needs to be stopped, and it will be up to the people to do it.  The hundreds outside the Capitol need to be multiplied, quickly, into a massive resistance that no one, including the new Congressional leadership, can ignore.

What brought people to DC to demand Bush's impeachment?

Those attending the rally were all drawn by a sense that they could not sit by and allow the government to carry out war crimes in their names.  On the buses from New York City to DC, one young musician described the parallels between what the Bush regime is doing to Nazi Germany (the Patriot Act and the Enabling Act, scapegoating, wars of aggression, etc.), and that he can't live in a country like that, and can't sleep at night unless he does something to stop it.  A young woman who had not been to a rally since the protests against the Republican National Convention in 2004 described how she just couldn't continue to sit at home angry at what was going on, and had to act to stop it.

One man had who had driven from Illinois with his friend said that for the first time in his life he felt embarrassed to be an American, because people are being killed by the US for profit.  Two people from Pennsylvania who had come to see their Congressman get sworn in decided their time would be better spent outside protesting to demand Bush's impeachment.