Barack Obama will be given a 'kill switch' in times of national emergency
President Obama will be given the power to shut down the Internet with a 'kill switch' in a new law being proposed in the US.
would be able to order popular search engines such a Google and Yahoo to suspend access their websites in times of national
Other US based Internet service providers as well as broadband providers would also come under his control in times of a
'cybersecurity emergency.' Any company that failed to comply would be subject to huge fines.
Critics of the new law, which has
been proposed by former presidential candidate Joe Liebermann, said it would be an abuse of power to let the White House control the
TechAmerica, one of the largest U.S. technology lobby groups, said the new law had the 'potential for absolute
The proposed legislation, introduced into the US Senate by Lieberman who is chairman of the US Homeland Security committee,
seeks to grant the President broad emergency powers over the internet in times of national emergency.
A sustained terror attack on
multiple cities would be considered a national emergency as would a cyber attack by 'hackers' on the US financial system.
of National Intelligence Dennis Blair warned earlier this year that the US is 'severely threatened' by malicious cyber attacks.
number of attacks on Government departments has increased by 400 per cent in the last three years.
Under the proposed bill, which has
been dubbed an Internet kill switch', the US Government would effectively seize control of access to the internet.
Lieberman argued the
bill was necessary to 'preserve those networks and assets and our country and protect our people'.
He said: 'For all of its
'user-friendly' allure, the Internet can also be a dangerous place with electronic pipelines that run directly into everything from our
personal bank accounts to key infrastructure to government and industrial secrets.
'Our economic security, national security and public safety are now all at risk from new kinds of enemies--cyber-warriors, cyber-spies,
cyber-terrorists and cyber-criminals.'
His bill is formally titled the Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act, or
While the US Government would not be able to control the internet in other countries access to the most popular sites would be
Google,Yahoo and YouTube, the top three most visited sites, are all based in the US.
Google logs an estimated two
billion hits a day from 300 million users.
Under the cyber law any company on a list created by Homeland Security that also 'relies on'
the Internet, the telephone system, or any other component of the U.S. 'information infrastructure' would be subject to command by a new
National Centre for Cybersecurity and Communications (NCCC) that would be created inside Homeland Security.
Google, the world's most
popular search engine, refused to comment. A spokesman said the law was not yet Government policy.
Flash Back: "Something from nothing cost money and blood!"
Lecture by Ron Paul presented at the Ludwig von Mises Institute's "Prosperity War and Depression" seminar. Held at the Mises Institute in Auburn Alabama October 24-25 2003.
New Hampshire passes resolution that immediately *Voids** Several Federal Laws* and *Threatens Counterstrike* against any Federal actions which "Breach Of Peace". patdollard.com
New Hampshire Fires First Shot Of Civil War by passing Resolution Immediately Voiding Several Federal Laws,
Threatens Counterstrike Against Federal "Breach Of Peace"
6/6/2010 Posted By Pat Dollard.
The New Hampshire state legislature took an unbelievably bold step Monday by introducing a resolution to declare certain actions by the
federal government to completely totally void and warning that certain future acts will be viewed as a "breach of peace" with the states
themselves that risks nullifying the Constitution."
This act by New Hampshire is a clear warning to the federal government that they could face being stripped of their power by the States
(presumably through civil war!).
The remarkable document outlines with perfect clarity, some basics long forgotten. For instance, it reminds Congress "That the
Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of
the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offences against the law of nations, slavery, and no other crimes
whatsoever;. . . . . therefore all acts of Congress which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so enumerated in the
Constitution are altogether void, and of no force;"
Federal gun crime laws? Void. Federal drug crime laws? Void. The gazzillion other federal criminal laws that deal with anything other than
the specific enumerated crimes? ALL VOID.
One would think that if any lawyer anywhere in the entire country was worth his salt, all federal criminal trials would have ended years
ago. This seems to prove that most lawyers are dullards.
New Hampshire deals a complete death blow to the pending federal hate crimes legislation by pointing out "That, therefore, all acts of
Congress of the United States which do abridge the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, are not law, but are
altogether void, and of no force;
. . . . ."
Later in the Resolution, New Hampshire makes clear what the feds are now risking if they proceed further: The removal of all powers from
the federal government by the States!
Quoting directly from the Resolution: "That any Act by the Congress of the United States, Executive Order of the President of the United
States of America or Judicial Order by the Judicatories of the United States of America which assumes a power not delegated to the government
of United States of America by the Constitution for the United States of America and which serves to diminish the liberty of the any of the
several States or their citizens shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of
the United States of America. Acts which would cause such a nullification include, but are not limited to:
I. Establishing martial law or a state of emergency within one of the States comprising the United States of America without the consent
of the legislature of that State.
II. Requiring involuntary servitude, or governmental service other than a draft during a declared war, or pursuant to, or as an
alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.
III. Requiring involuntary servitude or governmental service of persons under the age of 18 other than pursuant to, or as an alternative
to, incarceration after due process of law.
IV. Surrendering any power delegated or not delegated to any corporation or foreign government.
V. Any act regarding religion; further limitations on freedom of political speech; or further limitations on freedom of the press.
VI. Further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition; and That
should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or Judicial Order be put into force, all powers previously delegated to the
United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually. Any future government of
the United States of America shall require ratification of three quarters of the States seeking to form a government of the United States of
America and shall not be binding upon any State not seeking to form such a government; and That copies of this resolution be transmitted by
the house clerk to the President of the United States, each member of the United States Congress, and the presiding officers of each State's
Why US invades a 3rd world country?: Minerals and Opium Worth $1 Trillion
(From Paul, news contributor.)
U.S. Identifies Vast Mineral Riches in Afghanistan
The previously unknown deposits — including huge veins of iron, copper, cobalt, gold and critical industrial metals like lithium — are so big and include so many minerals that are essential to modern industry that Afghanistan could eventually be transformed into one of the most important mining centers in the world, the United States officials believe.
March 24th of this year was the thirtieth anniversary of the assassination of Oscar Arnulfo Romero, the Roman Catholic archbishop of El
His killing drew attention to the murderous rampages of death squads in that nation and throughout Central America as no other slaying
had, although hundreds of thousands of civilians were slaughtered in El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua and Honduras before and during the
1980s by paramilitary formations usually led by graduates of the U.S.’s School of the Americas and covertly funded by the same
nation’s Central Intelligence Agency.
Graduates of the Pentagon’s School of the Americas at Fort Benning, Georgia (now the equally euphemistic Western Hemisphere
Institute for Security Cooperation) include the man responsible for ordering Romero’s killing, the late Roberto D’Aubuisson;
Efrain Rios Montt, head of the military junta in Guatemala in 1982-1983 which perpetrated some of the worst atrocities in the nation’s
bloodstained history; and Romeo Vasquez Velasquez, who was dismissed as chief of the Honduran military on June 25 of last year and led the
coup against President Manuel Zelaya three days later.
After being appointed El Salvador’s top ecclesiastic in 1977 Romero, until then considered a doctrinal if not a political
conservative, spoke out forcefully against the abuses of the country’s military and the deaths squads linked to it.
Two months before he was killed he wrote to then U.S. President Jimmy Carter imploring him to desist from arming and training the
Salvadoran army, particularly plans to “train three Salvadoran battalions in logistics, communications and intelligence,” and
criticizing the fact that three months before “a group of six Americans was in El Salvador…providing $200,000 in gas masks and
flak jackets and teaching how to use them against demonstrators.” 
His appeal was ignored.
On the last full day of his life Archbishop Romero celebrated mass at the Cathedral of San Salvador and ended his homily (a sermon
ordinarily based on the day’s Gospel reading) with impassioned words that were an indictment, plea and command:
“I would like to make an appeal in a special way to the men of the army, to the police, to those in the barracks. Brothers, you are
part of our own people. You kill your own campesino brothers and sisters. And before an order to kill that a man may give, the law of God
must prevail that says: Thou shalt not kill! No soldier is obliged to obey an order against the law of God.
“No one has to fulfill an immoral law. It is time to recover your consciences and to obey your consciences rather than the orders of
sin. The church, defender of the rights of God, of the law of God, of human dignity, the dignity of the person, cannot remain silent before
such abomination. We want the government to take seriously that reforms are worth nothing when they come about stained with so much blood. In
the name of God, and in the name of this suffering people whose laments rise to heaven each day more tumultuously, I beg you, I ask you, I
order you in the name of God: Stop the repression!” 
The following evening he said mass at the small chapel of the Divine Providence cancer hospital. During the most solemn segment of the
Catholic service, the liturgy of the Eucharist, the officiating priest consecrates and elevates in turn the communion wafer and wine.
As he lifts first the host, then the chalice, he utters an account of Jesus at the Last Supper:
“Before he was given up to death, a death he freely accepted, he took bread and gave you thanks. He broke the bread, gave it to his
disciples, and said: Take this, all of you, and eat it; this is my body which will be given up for you.
“When the supper was ended, he took the cup. Again he gave you thanks and praise, gave the cup to his disciples, and said:
“Take this, all of you, and drink from it; this is the cup of my blood, the blood of the new and everlasting covenant. It will be
shed for you and for all so that sins may be forgiven. Do this in memory of me.”
It was while Romero recited the last words that a shot from an M16 assault rifle pierced his heart, leaving him to bleed to death in front
of the altar, his blood mingling with the spilled communion wine.
Thirty years later no one has ever been convicted of, no one has ever been charged with, his murder.
The Salvadoran death squads and their opposite numbers elsewhere in Central America tried to hide their violent and grisly crimes under
the cloak of religiosity, but to murder El Salvador’s top religious leader at the moment and under the circumstances they did was the
work of men without moral or spiritual motives. It was the act of brutes.
Eight years ago a BBC report stated that the killing was, “according to declassified US documents and other witnesses, carried out
by Salvadorean police intelligence agents on the orders of Major Roberto D’Aubuisson.”  The U.S. military-trained
D’Aubuisson carried the details of his role to the grave with him in 1992.
After Romero’s death, after his – even in the most secular acceptance of the word – martyrdom, the mantle of the U.S.
presidency was passed from Carter to Ronald Reagan, who appointed then recently retired Army general and NATO Supreme Allied Commander
Alexander Haig as his secretary of state.
In his eighteen-month tenure at what is formally the top diplomatic post in the U.S., Haig was involved in military, covert and in some
instances openly terrorist operations against the governments of Afghanistan, Angola, (post-Khmer Rouge) Cambodia, Ethiopia, Grenada,
Mozambique, Poland and Suriname among other nations, but from the day he took the helm at the State Department his main focus was on Central
It was during his watch there from 1981-1982 that the death squad campaigns in El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras and the Contra war
against Nicaragua began in earnest.
During the early years of the first Reagan term U.S. military aid to El Salvador was increased from $5.9 million 1980 to $35.5 million in
1981 and to $82 million in 1982. A fourteenfold increase in two years.
This March 24th a government of El Salvador for the first time officially apologized on behalf of the state for the murder of Romero.
President Mauricio Funes, elected last June on the ticket of the Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front – the very group Washington
armed and trained the Salvadoran military to exterminate thirty years ago – said on the anniversary that “This is something that
should have been done a long time ago.” 
His comment was uttered during a ceremony unveiling a mural dedicated to Oscar Romero at San Salvador’s international airport.
A thousand Salvadorans marched from the chapel he was killed in to the cathedral in the capital chanting Romero’s own words:
“They can kill me, but they will never kill justice.”
His words, his example have unfortunately assumed more urgency thirty years after his death than any would have wished.
Last June 28 D’Aubuisson’s fellow graduate of the School of the America’s, Hondura’s General Romeo Vasquez
Velasquez, led a military coup d’etat against the standing government of President Manuel Zelaya and forced the head of state into
exile in Costa Rica.
The very next day President Barack Obama welcomed Colombian head of state Alvaro Uribe, linked to Latin America’s longest death
squad horrors, to the White House, and the visit was followed by news that the Pentagon was acquiring the use of seven new military bases in
the South American country. Colombia borders Venezuela and Ecuador, both Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA) members
along with Honduras before the coup.
To use an apt Cold War term, the coup was the opening salvo in the “rollback” against the most serious attempt in Latin
America’s history to assert itself against centuries of U.S. domination.
On January 13th of this year the post-coup regime of non-popularly elected Roberto Micheletti withdrew Honduras from ALBA, the only time a
member has left the alliance.
“Honduras’s entrance into the bloc in 2008 under the leadership of President Manuel Zelaya is considered to be one of the
motivations for the right wing military coup that kidnapped and expelled Zelaya last June.” 
Washington’s desperation has increased dramatically since the meeting of the Rio Group in Mexico last month, which “agreed to
form a Latin American alternative to the Organization of American States that excludes the United States and Canada.” 
Cutting across major ideological lines, 18 Latin American and 15 non-Ibero-American Caribbean nations met at what was declared a Unity
Summit, and in the words of the host country’s President Felipe Calderon, “We have decided to create an organization that
includes all the organizations of Latin America and the Caribbean. We have decided to base an organization on shared values including
sovereignty and the non-use of force, including threats of force, international cooperation, ever closer integration of Latin America and the
Caribbean and permanent political dialogue.” 
The new and expanded organization proposed, the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), will include all nations in the
Western Hemisphere except for the U.S. and Canada, will supplant and render moribund the U.S.-dominated Organization of American States
(OAS), and will “resolve a host of problems, including the launching of interaction with Mercosur, the Andean Community of Nations, the
Union of South American Nations, the Organization of Ibero-American States and ALBA – the Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas.”
A Russian analyst suggested that “There is little, if any, doubt that the future Community will be at loggerheads with the OAS,
since Washington is used to bossing Latin America around and imposing on the region what strategically important decisions suit it
He also warned that “The United States is certainly not about to trust some newly-formed organization with control of the processes
under way in the countries south of the Rio Grande.
“The Empire is getting ready to ‘act energetically’ to foil a constituent summit of the future Community of Latin
American and Caribbean States.” 
Early in March U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visited Costa Rica to embrace her nation’s new surrogate in Honduras,
Porfirio Lobo, and to chastise Latin America for defying Washington’s will. Lobo, for example, was the only Latin American head of
state (though one only recognized by the U.S. and a few allies) not invited to the Unity Summit in Mexico on February 22-23. His exclusion
was a frank commentary on the June 2008 coup by every government in the Western Hemisphere except his own and those of the U.S. and
“The United States helped to broker November elections that brought Honduran President Porfirio Lobo to power, but his government
has been shunned by several countries in the region because the polls were organized by the de facto government that overthrew
Clinton was “winding up a six-nation Latin American tour during which she was challenged by leaders who repeated charges that the
United States did not take a hard enough line against the coup, which echoed a long history of military takeovers in the region.”
With a command of diplomatese that renders her a worthy successor of the late Alexander Haig, Clinton stated it was time to “move
forward,” as “We think that Honduras has taken important and necessary steps that deserve the recognition and normalization of
Unintentionally emphasizing why there is a need for ALBA and CELAC, she added, “Other countries in the region say that they want to
wait a while. I don’t know what they’re waiting for….”
In Costa Rica she met with Lobo and “said she had notified Congress that the United States would restart the flow of more than USD
30 million in non-humanitarian aid to Honduras that was cut off after the June 28 coup that ousted Zelaya.”
While offering lip service to the relative undesirability of military coups in the U.S.’s backyard, she nevertheless asserted
“But we think its time to move forward and ensure that such disruptions of democracy do not and cannot happen in the future.”
 Scant comfort to other ALBA member states awaiting Washington’s next maneuver.
To refute what Clinton characterized as the Lobo regime’s “commitments to re-establish constitutional order in the
country,” on March 24 Honduran professor Jose Manuel Flores, an active opponent of the newly-installed government of Porfirio Lobo, was
murdered at the Instituto San Jose del Pedregal where he taught, “shot in the back when hooded individuals entered the school through
the roof….” 
Hooded assassins murdering dissenting academics conjures up nightmares from the darkest period of death squad atrocities in the 1980s.
According to human rights and resistance groups in Honduras, since last year’s coup there have been 130 murders and over 3,000
arrests of opponents of the junta. 
On March 25 the National Popular Resistance Front announced plans for a mass rally in the capital that “will coincide with a general
strike and a national mourning campaign convened by teachers’ organizations after Professor Jose Manuel Flores was killed by hooded men
two days ago,” blaming “the Honduran oligarchy and Porfirio Lobo’s de facto regime”  for the latest killing of
those Clinton demands “move forward” by submitting to Washington’s diktat.
In late February over 10,000 supporters of deposed President Manuel Zelaya left the main university in the capital of Tegucigalpa, but
“were blocked by soldiers from nearing the presidential palace and diverted to the parliament in the city center….” Troops
ordered from their barracks by a regime that “has taken important and necessary steps that deserve the recognition and normalization of
relations,” as Hillary Clinton would phrase it a week later.
“Six teachers’ unions backed the protests and called for classes to be suspended nationwide.” 
Military coups d’etat and masked hit squads are back in Central America with Washington’s blessing and the threats are not
limited to Honduras, which is intended as both object lesson and prototype by the White House and the State Department.
In February Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez warned “that the right-wing in Latin America was being organized to attack the
Bolivian Alliance of the Americas (ALBA) and the Union of South American Nations (Unasur),” adding however that “the U.S.
government would not be able to stop the development of ALBA in Central America despite the coup in Honduras.”
“The U.S. Empire” will employ reactionary and covert forces to subordinate the next government of Brazil (a general election
will be held this October), “which also will be terrible for the unity of South America.” 
In addition, it was reported on March 25 that Nicaragua’s ambassador to the Organization of American States, Denis Moncada, accused
the U.S. ambassador to his nation, Robert Callahan, of “meddling in Nicaraguan internal affairs.” Callahan, Moncada continued,
“has publicly supported attempts by Nicaraguan opposition parties, rating as fraudulent the 2008 municipal elections, when the
Sandinista National Liberation Front won the majority of the country’s mayoralties.” 
The Nicaraguan press recently published an article by Uruguayan journalist Jorge Capelan titled “The United States and its Web of
NGOs in Nicaragua,” which detailed that “the destabilizing strategy the United States has pursued in Venezuela through
non-governmental organizations and ‘contractor’ firms is also being applied in Nicaragua against the Sandinista
The report documented that since 1994 the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) created “so-called Offices of
Transition Initiatives (OTI) in several countries worldwide.
“They were originally created to support transition to capitalism in Eastern European countries, but they later spread to other
states where it was necessary to address situations in which US interests were threatened.”
An OTI was launched in Venezuela in July of 2002, two months after the 47-hour coup there, and in late 2005 in Bolivia in an attempt to
prevent Evo Morales’ victory in the December 18 presidential election.
Although there “is no OTI in Nicaragua,” USAID is concocting “a similar strategy against the Sandinista government
through the CampTransparencia program run by the paramilitary DynCorp firm.
“CampTransparencia has organized forums and other similar activities in Nicaragua. Its main cadres have experience in ‘regime
change’ operations.” 
The current preferred method of effecting the subversion and overthrow of governments considered to present obstacles to U.S. geopolitical
designs is the “color revolution” model first employed in Yugoslavia in 2000 and replicated in the former Soviet states of
Georgia, Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan. The first attempt to export a variation of the technique to Latin America was in Bolivia two years ago.
Last May Hillary Clinton railed against “growing Iranian, Chinese and Russian influence in the Western Hemisphere,” which has
ostensibly encouraged “leftist leaders like Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, Bolivia’s Evo Morales and Nicaragua’s Daniel
Ortega to promote anti-U.S. sentiment and rely on aid from China, Iran and Russia.”  She particularly singled out Nicaragua,
stating “We are looking to figure out how to deal with [President Daniel] Ortega” as “the Iranians are building a huge
embassy in Managua. You can only imagine what it’s for.” 
In the 1980s the Reagan administration frequently invoked alleged Russian and Iranian influence in Nicaragua to justify its support for
the Contra war against the nation.
To Central America’s immediate north, on March 22 Defense Secretary Robert Gates and chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff
Admiral Michael Mullen accompanied Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to Mexico, and upon returning top U.S. military commander Mullen spoke
of Mexico’s “own version of counterinsurgency,” and said, “We’re working with them to generate as much capability as they
can in that fight.”  In speaking as he did, Mullen reiterated his statements in January of 2009 that the U.S. military was prepared to
employ the same counterinsurgency tactics used in Afghanistan and Iraq for Mexico and that the infamous Plan Colombia could be the
“overarching” model for the wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Earlier this month the joint commander of United States Northern Command (NORTHCOM) and North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD),
General Victor Renuart, spoke before the Senate Armed Services Committee and said of his dual commands that their missions range “from
supporting law enforcement on the U.S.-Mexico border to monitoring Russian military planes and ships off U.S. borders,” and that
“Northcom has shared military lessons learned in Iraq and Afghanistan to combat violence and illegal activity on the Southwest
The White House and the Pentagon are not prepared to allow the rest of the nations in the Americas to determine their own destiny without
interference. Without intervention.
The 2002 coup in Venezuela and the 2009 coup in Honduras are not the last that Washington will support given the opportunity. Latin
American vigilance and unity are required more than ever before.
The Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported Egyptian opposition members criticized the government for cooperating with the U.S. and Israeli forces and allowing the passage of the ships through Egyptian territorial waters. The Red Sea is the most direct route to the Persian Gulf from the Mediterranean.
Retired Egyptian General Amin Radi, chairman of the national security affairs committee, told the paper that “the decision to declare war on Iran is not easy, and Israel, due to its wild nature, may start a war just to remain the sole nuclear power in the region,” according to Yedioth Internet, an Israeli news site.
The passage of a warship armada through the Suez Canal and headed for the Persian Gulf and Iran is apparently not deemed important enough to be reported by the corporate media in the United States.
Egypt recently rejected an Israeli request to prevent Gaza aid ships from passing through the Suez Canal. According to a report by al-Jazeera, Israel appealed to Egyptians asking them to prevent the passage of Iranian ships through the Suez Canal. The Egyptians responded that due to international agreements on movement through the Suez Canal, Egypt cannot prevent ships from passing through the canal unless a ship belongs to a state that is at war with Egypt. Iran and Egypt are not at war.
The United States and Israel, the sole nuclear-armed power in the Middle East, have not ruled out a military strike to destroy Iran’s nuclear program.
A number of Israeli politicians and scholars have admitted Israel has used its nuclear weapons for “compellent purposes,” in short forcing others to accept Israeli political demands.
Israel’s threats to use nuclear weapons have increased significantly since it was discovered in 2002 that Iran was building uranium enrichment facilities. Israel’s former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon “called on the international community to target Iran as soon as the imminent conflict with Iraq is complete,” the Sunday Times reported on November 5, 2002. The United States invaded Iraq on March 20, 2003.
Earlier this month Israel leaked to the press that they had permission from Saudi Arabia to use their air space to attack Iran. “In the week that the UN Security Council imposed a new round of sanctions on Tehran, defence sources in the Gulf say that Riyadh has agreed to allow Israel to use a narrow corridor of its airspace in the north of the country to shorten the distance for a bombing run on Iran,” the Sunday Times reported on June 12. On June 14, the ambassador of Saudi Arabia to UK Prince Mohammed bin Nawaf issued a categorical denial of the report.
On June 17, Iran’s parliament warned it will respond in kind to inspection of its ships under a fourth round of sanctions imposed on the country by the UN Security Council. “Even if one Iranian ship is stopped for security-check, we will act likewise and thoroughly inspect any (western) ship passing through the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz,” member of the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission Hossein Ebrahimi said.
Also on Saturday, Iran accused the United States of “deception” and insisted its missile program is for self-defense after a top U.S. official claimed that Iran had the capacity to attack Europe. “The Islamic Republic’s missile capability has been designed and implemented to defend against any military aggression and it does not threaten any nation,” Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi said in a statement carried by state media.
Vahidi announced on April 10 that Iran will use all available options to defend itself if the country comes under a military attack. “Americans have said they will use all options against Iran, we announce that we will use all options to defend ourselves,” Vahidi told the Tehran Times.
How the ultimate BP Gulf disaster could kill millions by Terrence Aym
(From Jim, news contributor.)
I, John, here at the truth news am asking all of you for a favor for me, please pray for everyone that this doesn't happen, most all my family and friends live in southern Florida.
Disturbing evidence is mounting that something frightening is happening deep under the waters of the Gulf of Mexico”something far worse than the BP oil gusher.
Warnings were raised as long as a year before the Deepwater Horizon disaster that the area of seabed chosen by the BP geologists might be unstable, or worse, inherently dangerous.
What makes the location that Transocean chose potentially far riskier than other potential oil deposits located at other regions of the Gulf? It can be summed up with two words: methane gas.
The same methane that makes coal mining operations hazardous and leads to horrendous mining accidents deep under the earth also can present a high level of danger to certain oil exploration ventures.
Location of Deepwater Horizon oil rig was criticized
More than 12 months ago some geologists rang the warning bell that the Deepwater Horizon exploratory rig might have been erected directly
over a huge underground reservoir of methane.
Documents from several years ago indicate that the subterranean geologic formation may contain the presence of a huge methane deposit.
None other than the engineer who helped lead the team to snuff the Gulf oil fires set by Saddam Hussein to slow the advance of American
troops has stated that a huge underground lake of methane gas”compressed by a pressure of 100,000 pounds per square inch (psi)”could be
released by BP's drilling effort to obtain the oil deposit.
Current engineering technology cannot contain gas that is pressurized to 100,000 psi.
By some geologists' estimates the methane could be a massive 15 to 20 mile toxic and explosive bubble trapped for eons under the Gulf sea
floor. In their opinion, the explosive destruction of the Deepwater Horizon wellhead was an accident just waiting to happen.
Yet the disaster that followed the loss of the rig pales by comparison to the apocalyptic disaster that may come.
A cascading catastrophe
According to worried geologists, the first signs that the methane may burst its way through the bottom of the ocean would be fissures or
cracks appearing on the ocean floor near the damaged well head.
Evidence of fissures opening up on the seabed have been captured by the robotic submersibles working to repair and contain the ruptured well.
Smaller, independent plumes have also appeared outside the nearby radius of the bore hole itself.
According to some geological experts, BP's operations set into motion a series of events that may be irreversible. Step-by-step the drilling
team committed one error after another.
Congressmen Henry Waxman, D-CA, and Bart Stupak, D-MI, in a letter sent to BP CEO Tony Hayward, identified 5 missteps made by BP during the
period culminating with the explosion.
Waxman, chair of the Congressional energy panel and Stupak, the head of the subcommittee on oversight and investigations, said, "The common
feature of these five decisions is that they posed a trade-off between cost and well safety."
The two Representatives also stated in the 14-page letter to Hayward that "Time after time, it appears that BP made decisions that increased
the risk of a blowout to save the company time or expense."
Called by some insiders investigating the ongoing disaster a "perfect storm of catastrophe," the wellhead blew on the sea floor catapulting a
stream of mud, oil and gas upwards at the speed of sound.
In describing the events”that transpired in a matter of seconds”they note that immediately following the rupture the borehole pipe's
casing blew away exposing a straight line 8 miles deep for the pressurized gas to escape. The result was cavitation, an irregular pressure
variance sometimes experience by deep diving vessels such as nuclear submarines. This cavitation created a supersonic bubble of explosive
methane gas that resulted in a supersonic explosion killing 11 men and completely annihilating the drilling platform.
Death from the depths
With the emerging evidence of fissures, the quiet fear now is the methane bubble rupturing the seabed and exploding into the Gulf waters. If
the bubble escapes, every ship, drilling rig and structure within the region of the bubble will instantaneously sink. All the workers,
engineers, Coast Guard personnel and marine biologists measuring the oil plumes' advance will instantly perish.
As horrible as that is, what would follow is an event so potentially horrific that it equals in its fury the Indonesian tsunami that killed
more than 600,000, or the destruction of Pompeii by Mt. Vesuvius.
The ultimate Gulf disaster, however, would make even those historical horrors pale by comparison. If the huge methane bubble breaches the
seabed, it will erupt with an explosive fury similar to that experienced during the eruption of Mt. Saint Helens in the Pacific Northwest. A
gas gusher will surge upwards through miles of ancient sedimentary rock”layer after layer”past the oil reservoir. It will explode upwards
propelled by 50 tons psi, burst through the cracks and fissures of the compromised sea floor, and rupture miles of ocean bottom with one
The burgeoning methane gas cloud will surface, killing everything it touches, and set off a supersonic tsunami with the wave traveling
somewhere between 400 to 600 miles per hour.
While the entire Gulf coastline is vulnerable, the state most exposed to the fury of a supersonic wave towering 150 to 200 feet or more is
Florida. The Sunshine State only averages about 100 feet above sea level with much of the coastline and lowlands and swamps near zero
A supersonic tsunami would literally sweep away everything from Miami to the panhandle in a matter of minutes. Loss of human
life would be virtually instantaneous and measured in the millions. Of course the states of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and
southern region of Georgia”a state with no Gulf coastline”would also experience tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of
Loss of property is virtually incalculable and the days of the US position as the world's superpower would be literally gone in a flash...of
PORT CHESTER, N.Y. — The court-ordered election that allowed residents of one New York town to flip the lever six times for one candidate — and produced a Hispanic winner — could expand to other towns where minorities complain their voices aren't being heard.
The unusual election was imposed on Port Chester after a federal judge determined that Hispanics were being treated unfairly.