by John Vodila
Nine Years Later Truth Still Denied.
“When even one American, who has done nothing wrong, is forced by fear to shut his mind and close his mouth, then all Americans are in peril”- President Harry S. Truman
Note: This report contains history, facts and see for yourself information. I know there are many theories and some are profound, but this report is based on what I feel to be the main dots, a map to the who, what, and why questions of 9/11.
I have put this together as printer friendly as I could for those that do not have computers, for those that do please print and share with those that don’t, most photos are linked and numbered to the video companion page and marked (video) just click the picture. Some of these are very rare, I highly recommend watching them to get the full picture. Please spread far and wide, it still is apparent that many people even 9 years later are not at all aware of this information. It is no wonder, they have done a magnificent job with their diversions, removal and or edited news and information from 9/11.
On Sept 10th Donald Rumsfeld warned America! In my opinion this was the last time we have heard any truth from our government, truth was silenced the next day.
CBS reporter Vince Gonzales: The day before 911 Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld declared war, not on foreign terrorist…
Donald Rumsfeld: The adversary is closer to home, it’s the Pentagon bureaucracy.
VG: He said money wasted by military poses a serious threat…
DR: In fact it could be said it’s a matter of life and death…
VG: Rumsfeld promised change, but the next day the world changed, and in the rush to fund the war on terrorism the war on waste seems to be forgotten.
President Bush: My 03 budget calls for more than 48 billion dollars in new defense spending.
VG: More money for the Pentagon when it’s own auditors admit the military cannot account for 25% of what it already spends.
DR: By some estimates we cannot track 2.3 trillion dollars in transactions.
VG: 2.3 trillion dollars, that s with a T, that s $8000 for every man woman and child in America.
They are masters at deception.
How convenient it is, this huge debate over the Mosque at ground Zero, just ahead of the 9th anniversary of 9/11, and most fall into line at yet another diversion from the truth, and in the back ground… “To keep program secret, CIA whisks 911 figures from Gitmo before court ruling-8/6/2010″
I never would have believed there would come a time in my America where someone searching for the truth, a “Truther” would be someone ridiculed and demonized. How is this, it is now tolerated to turn a blind eye to the truth in the U.S. at the expense of the lives of others? We truly are all in a sinking boat, and paddling as hard as we can from shore into deeper waters. Keep in mind, all the media and most of the government are fully aware of what you are about to read. I take it very personal and find it to be an insult and a disgrace to the United States of America as a whole and the people that have been lost on, and since 9/11 . As long as the lies get repeated the truth will remain covert, this is the key to the decimation of our nation.
“America is being obliterated and destroying others from lack of truth”
TRUTHER VS TRUTH DENIER
If understanding what you see and hear for yourself makes you a Truther, then I am a Truther.
If understanding you are being lied to, and wanting to find out makes you a Truther, then I am a Truther.
If you see something is black and someone tells you it’s white, and you refuse to believe it makes you a Truther, then I am a Truther.
If someone tells you that something was not there, and you know it was, and refuse to go along makes you a Truther, then I am a Truther.
If you join thousands of architects, engineers, physicists, military, government, veterans, scientist, chemist, scholars to name a few, for the search for what really happened on 911 makes you a Truther, then I am a Truther. Last I checked when googled for 9/11 truth there were 20million 800 thousand results.
“Truth is the biggest secret, guarded and fought over, sometimes to the death.”
Now let’s get into some of the significant issues encircling 9/11…
Usama involvement false, truth denied
The Usama bin Laden boogy man syndrome, most still have it, bad. Cheney and the FBI have told us years ago there is ‘NO’ evidence of Saudi born Usama bin Laden being involved with 9/11.
FBI Director Mueller himself, in a public address months after the attacks, said that… “In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper either here in the United States, or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot.”
bin Laden has never been wanted by the FBI for 9/11, he is on the 10 most wanted list for act’s outside of the United States and not for 9-11.
FBI chief investigative spokesman Rex Tomb has publicly stated that the reason bin Laden isn’t wanted for 9/11 is because there is “no hard evidence” linking him to the Sept. 11 plot.
President Bush 6 months after 9/11 responding to a reporters question… “…I don’t know where he is, nor, I just don’t spend that much time on him to be honest with you…”
On March 29th, 2006 on the Tony Snow Show, Dick Cheney said…“So we’ve never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Usama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming.”
Usama bin Laden from the very beginning said himself he was not involved with the Sept 11 attack.
September 28, 2001 in Ummat, an Urdu-language daily newspaper in Karachi, Pakistan bin Laden stated in an interview…
“I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie.
“I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act.
“Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle.”
bin Laden, 2000 very sick. Usama bin Laden has been dead for many years.
Come On America… this is ridiculous!!!
It is common knowledge Usama bin Laden was a CIA asset in the Afghan/Soviet war.
USA Today 21 August 1998
“Ironically, bin-Laden started out on the same side as the United States. In 1979 he supported the Afgan mujadheddin guerrillas in their battle against the occupying Soviet Union.They were supported by U.S. money, arms and CIA training in the Cold War battle for global influence. Bin Laden learned skills that would help him in the terrorist trade. According to an upcoming Congressional Research Service report, bin Laden gained “prominence during the Afghan war for his role in the recruitment, training and transportation of Arab nationals.”
guardian.co.uk“Delighted by his impeccable Saudi credentials, the CIA gave Osama free rein in Afghanistan, as did Pakistan’s intelligence generals. Bin Laden and a man named Mustafa Chalaby, who ran a jihad refugee centre in Brooklyn [New York, U.S.A.], were both protégés of Abdullah Azzam. A formative influence on bin Laden, the charismatic Azzam was killed in a car-bomb in 1987: according to some rumours he was killed by the CIA. Others claim he was himself a CIA agent. At the Farm and other secret camps, young Afghans and Arab nationals from countries such as Egypt and Jordan learned strategic sabotage skills. Passed down to the younger jihad generation which filled the ranks of the Bin Laden organisation, these skills would come back to haunt the United States.”
“Osama bin Laden was one of many US beneficiaries in its war against Moscow. He spent years in the mid-1980s travelling widely to raise funds and recruit thousands of Muslim youths to fight the Soviets. The rise of Al-QaedaIn 1988, with US knowledge, Bin Laden created Al Qaeda (The Base): a conglomerate of quasi-independent Islamic terrorist cells in countries spread across at least 26 countries.”
The plan all along…more war and more defence spending. But how were they going to get the American people behind it, after the collapse of the Soviet Union we were looking at a peace dividend, oh boy, we cant have that now can we? They had to come up with a new threat and it’s all history now. For those that don’t know what a peace dividend is here’s the definition from Answers.com- Term used to describe the reallocation of spending from military purposes to peacetime priorities. After the end of World War II and at the end of the Cold War, government officials spoke of the peace dividend which could be spent on housing, education, social initiatives, deficit reduction, and other programs instead of on maintaining the military establishment.
Project for the new American century, this ‘Think Tank’ was established in the spring of 1997:
REBUILDING AMERICA’S DEFENSES (PNAC) Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century
REBUILDING AMERICA’S DEFENSES (PNAC)
Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century
“We started from the premise that U.S.military capabilities should be sufficient to support an American grand strategy committed to building upon this unprecedented opportunity.” (The unprecedented opportunity here is the collapse of the USSR, 1991)
An interesting passage in the doc…
A transformation strategy that solely pursued capabilities for projecting force from the United States, for example, and sacrificed forward basing and presence, would be at odds with larger American policy goals and would trouble American allies. Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. Domestic politics and industrial policy will shape the pace and content of transformation as much as the requirements of current missions.
The box cutters bull:
If you know for a fact the only person that reported box cutters was Barbara Olson from her cell phone in a call to her husband Ted Olson aboard American Airlines Flight 77. Flight 77 was a 757 and did not have air phones on board, only American Airlines 767′s and 777′s had air phones. Even if one believes cell phones work or flight 77 had air phones on board, at high altitudes in a passenger jet in 2001 when the technology was not developed until 2002. The problem with this story is that when the FBI presented evidence at the Markari Zarkowi trial, in this evidence was the phone records for Barbara Olsons cell phone. The phone records showed that there was one attempted call, and it lasted zero seconds. Ted said she called twice and talked for a minute each time. And you have questions makes you a Truther, then, I am a Truther.
Anthrax and government officials on Cipro before 911
If you know an investigation led the Anthrax to the US defense department, an analysis of the spores that killed Robert Stephens and infected some of his colleagues was identified as the Ames Strain and the Ames strain comes from the US Bio Defense Department and you have questions makes you a Truther, then, I am a Truther.
The White House had fore knowledge of the Anthrax attacks.
The White House started using Cipro on September 11, 2001. This is weeks before the anthrax attacks that began in October, 2001.
Larry Klayman at Judicial Watch said… “One doesn’t simply start taking a powerful antibiotic for no good reason. The American people are entitled to know what the White House staffers knew nine months ago. “
Lawyers from Judicial Watch were representing postal workers at the Brentwood Postal Facility in Washington-DC, Brentwood handled all DC’s mail. Many became ill and two died from Anthrax exposure.
Below quote from Interview on History channel Doc
“There are 89 different types of Anthrax but each one has it’s own type of trail, this one led directly back to our own defense establishment”.”What we are dealing with here is an inside job”.
If you know about strange evacuations, construction, new wiring for internet, power downs of the WTC’s and bomb sniffing dogs removed before 911 and-
Scott Forbes, IT specialist and senior database administrator for Fiduciary Trust located in the south tower reported a power-down over the weekend before 911. Scott said they were notified three weeks before by the Port Authority and this was very short notice to prepare their banking systems for a shut down, he explained, “this was a very unprecedented big deal because of the data center and originating servers were on the 97th floor, there would be no protection and the doors would be left wide open”.
Also Scott reported on the weekend of the power-down all security cameras and locks were off and there were strange men that didn’t work at the Trade Center in coveralls caring huge tool boxes and reels of cable around the building. Employees were told internet cables were being upgraded. Scott stated that in the four to six weeks before 911 there had been what sounded like rebuilding work going on upstairs on the 98th floor and there was a very noticeable gray dust all around the window sill vents he constantly had to clean.
Scott worked overtime to get the systems back up and took the day off on 911. And as he watched the towers collapse he was sure this was what the strange power-down and construction was for.
He notified authorities and even the 911 commission about this, and was ignored. also-
William Rodriguez, over twenty years employed at the World Trade Center a real hero and last one out on 911 said that with the power shut down all security was shut down and “there would be free access to anything there to do any kind of setup”. Also on 911 he heard strange heavy equipment being moved around “like dumpsters with metal wheels” on the 34th floor which was an empty floor that the elevator didn’t even stop at also=
Ben Fountain, Fireman Funds, reported unusual evacuations a number of times in the weeks before 911, “they knew this building was a target”.
Many employees said security was lifted and bomb sniffing dog’s were removed five days prior to 911. also-
Bush’s younger brother was in charge of electronic security for the World Trade Centers and Washingtons Dellis airport. The company SECURACOM from 1996 to 2000 had a contract for $8.3 million to install a new system in the World Trade Centers, Wirt D Walker III cousin of the Bush brothers was CEO of SECURACOM from 1999 to 2002, and you find this very disturbing makes you a Truther, then I am a Truther.
Fire Engineering magazine: “The “official investigation” blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a half-baked farce”
When you know Fire Engineering magazine a 125 year old paper respected by the fire engineering community. Head editor Bill Manning, wrote a piece in the January, 2002 edition requesting a “call to action” in stating that “the quick removal of the debris before being examined and investigated by the authorities was destruction of evidence and illegal”.
“Firefighters, this is your call to action. …contact your representatives in Congress and officials in Washington and help us correct this problem immediately.”
“I have combed through our national standard for fire investigation, NFPA 921, but nowhere in it does one find an exemption allowing the destruction of evidence for buildings over 10 stories tall.”
“The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately.”
“For more than three months, structural steel from the World Trade Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap. Crucial evidence that could answer many questions … is on the slow boat to China …”
WTC “INVESTIGATION”?: A CALL TO ACTION
Jan 1, 2002
$elling Out the Investigation
By Bill Manning – (Bill Manning, former editor of Fire Engineering joined Fire Apparatus Magazine)
Did they throw away the locked doors from the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire? Did they throw away the gas can used at the Happyland Social Club Fire? Did they cast aside the pressure-regulating valves at the Meridian Plaza Fire? Of course not. But essentially, that’s what they’re doing at the World Trade Center.
For more than three months, structural steel from the World Trade Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap. Crucial evidence that could answer many questions about high-rise building design practices and performance under fire conditions is on the slow boat to China, perhaps never to be seen again in America until you buy your next car.
Such destruction of evidence shows the astounding ignorance of government officials to the value of a thorough, scientific investigation of the largest fire-induced collapse in world history. I have combed through our national standard for fire investigation, NFPA 921, but nowhere in it does one find an exemption allowing the destruction of evidence for buildings over 10 stories tall.
Hoping beyond hope, I have called experts to ask if the towers were the only high-rise buildings in America of lightweight, center-core construction. No such luck. I made other calls asking if these were the only buildings in America with light-density, sprayed-on fireproofing. Again, no luck-they were two of thousands that fit the description.
Comprehensive disaster investigations mean increased safety. They mean positive change. NASA knows it. The NTSB knows it.
Does FEMA know it?
No. Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the “official investigation” blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure. Except for the marginal benefit obtained from a three-day, visual walk-through of evidence sites conducted by ASCE investigation committee members- described by one close source as a “tourist trip”-no one’s checking the evidence for anything.
Maybe we should live and work in planes. That way, if disaster strikes, we will at least be sure that a thorough investigation will help find ways to increase safety for our survivors.
As things now stand and if they continue in such fashion, the investigation into the World Trade Center fire and collapse will amount to paper- and computer generated hypotheticals.
However, respected members of the fire protection engineering community are beginning to raise red flags, and a resonating theory has emerged: The structural damage from the planes and the explosive ignition of jet fuel in themselves were not enough to bring down the towers. Rather, theory has it, the subsequent contents fires attacking the questionably fireproofed lightweight trusses and load-bearing columns directly caused the collapses in an alarmingly short time. Of course, in light of there being no real evidence thus far produced, this could remain just unexplored theory.
The frequency of published and unpublished reports raising questions about the steel fireproofing and other fire protection elements in the buildings, as well as their design and construction, is on the rise. The builders and owners of the World Trade Center property, the Port Authority of New York-New Jersey, a governmental agency that operates in an accountability vacuum beyond the reach of local fire and building codes, has denied charges that the buildings’ fire protection or construction components were substandard but has refused to cooperate with requests for documentation supporting its contentions.
Some citizens are taking to the streets to protest the investigation sellout. Sally Regenhard, for one, wants to know why and how the building fell as it did upon her unfortunate son Christian, an FDNY probationary firefighter. And so do we.
Clearly, there are burning questions that need answers. Based on the incident’s magnitude alone, a full-throttle, fully resourced, forensic investigation is imperative. More important, from a moral standpoint, for the safety of present and future generations who live and work in tall buildings-and for firefighters, always first in and last out-the lessons about the buildings’ design and behavior in this extraordinary event must be learned and applied in the real world.
To treat the September 11 incident any differently would be the height of stupidity and ignorance.
The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately.
The federal government must scrap the current setup and commission a fully resourced blue ribbon panel to conduct a clean and thorough investigation of the fire and collapse, leaving no stones unturned.
Firefighters, this is your call to action. Visit WTC “Investigation”?: A Call to Action, then contact your representatives in Congress and officials in Washington and help us correct this problem immediately.
Fact: molten metal was found, New York firefighters reported they found molten steel running down the channel rails like in a foundry.
The temperature at the core of “the pile,” is near 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, according to fire officials, who add that the fires are too deep for firefighters to get to. (ABC News, 9/18/01)
A thermal imagery map created day,s after 9/11 analyzed by the U.S. Geological Survey showed temperature in areas of the rubble near 2000 degrees F. and WTC 1,2 and 7′s debris piles smoldered for months and workers shoes would melt, the only explanation is the use of explosives.
Loizeaux said molten steel was found weeks after 9/11 during the debris removal of WTC1, WTC2 and debris of the unexplainable collapsed WTC7.
If when someone finds this information and wonders why our media and government is not reporting any of this, and not only not reporting, but worse, suppressing it, and thinks there has to be something wrong, makes them a Truther, then I am a Truther.
Jet fuel doesn’t burn hot enough to melt steal into lava, the collapse of the towers would have put any fires out all together and most of the jet fuel burnt off in the fire ball on impact. Also building 7 was not hit by an airplane and it was a hot spot also. The only explanation for temperatures hot enough to create these conditions is the use of thermite, will get into that later in the report.
Building 7 demolition truth denied
Note:For those not familiar, this is not one of the 110 story towers, this is a 47 story building that mysteriously collapsed at 17:20 on 9/11/2001. Just like the towers it fell at free fall speed, no resistance. They all fell at the same speed as if you dropped an apple from the same height.
WTC building seven (the Solomon Brothers building), a home for offices of the FBI,CIA,IRS, Secret Service, Department of Defense and Securities and Exchange Commission to name a few, was omitted from the government’s 9/11 Commission Report, and its collapse has yet to be explained by officials.
Dan Rather September 11th 2001- “Later today world trade center 7 collapsed, now here we are going to show you a video tape of the collapse it self. It’s amazing, amazing, incredible, pick your word. For the 3rd time today, it’s reminiscent of those pictures we have all seen to much on television before when a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down.”
Larry Silverstein took out a long lease on the World Trade Center six weeks before 9/11. On a PBS documentary titled “America Rebuilds”, aired in September of 2002 he said…
Larry Silverstein said… “I remember getting a call from the, ER, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, “We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.” And they made that decision to pull, and we watched the building collapse.”
“Pull It” is a demolitions contractors term for pulling a building down with explosives.
Former USAF non-com Douglas Herman writes in his report
titled, “Follow the Money to 9-11 Players Conspiracy”
“In building 7, (SEC) records pertaining to multi-billion dollar investigations. The Los Angeles Times reported on September 17, 2001 that an estimated 3,000 to 4,000 cases were destroyed.”
“If you follow the trillion-dollar money trail throughout 911, you easily see that those who stood to profit the most also occupied key places – military and civilian security systems, oil and gas consortium’s, intelligence agencies, US Department of Justice and the US media/ propaganda systems – to make 911 happen and, just as important, to conspire to conceal the crime.”
“When following the money trail, you realize the incalculable billions gained with the conquest of war-torn and impoverished Afghanistan, which depended on a manufactured attack. But rather than find and capture a CIA–created mastermind allegedly responsible for nearly 3,000 deaths, the sole purpose of the attack on Afghanistan appeared to be control of a country for the benefit of an oil pipeline.”
Flight 93 shot down
North Dakota Air National Guard
Governor of North Dakota John Hoeven presented the Airman Medal to Top gun Major Rick Gibney and three others of the Happy Hooligans for their distinctive service on 911, “three of them flew surveillance and one flew a special mission on that tragic day”, he said.
The flag during the ceremony at half staff “was the flag that flew over the Pentagon and was presented to the people of North Dakota in appreciation of their duty and in honor of those who died on Sept 11 2001 by Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld. Within minutes after the attack the North Dakota Air National Guard 119th fighter wing known world wide as the Happy Hooligans were flying security over our nations Capital.”
“The Airman Medal is awarded for a heroic act, usually at the voluntary risk of his or her life but not involving actual combat.”- USAF Personnel Center
Reporter quoting Gov of PA Tom Ridge
“The most horrifying aspect of this particular crash seen is how little debris is visible, “hundreds of investigators out there have found nothing larger than a phone book”
Fox reporter interview with Fox affiliate Pittsburgh photographer Chris Chaniki
“I have seen the pictures there and it looks like there’s nothing there except for a hole in the ground, nothing that you can distinguish that a plane had crashed there”
Pentagon: Flight 77 no plane there
Mineta testimony “during the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, ‘the plane is 50 miles out, the plane is 30 miles out.’ And when it got to ‘the plane is 10 miles out,” the young man also said to the Vice President, ‘Do the orders still stand?’ And the Vice President whipped his neck around and…said, ‘Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?”
Philip J. Berg, former Pennsylvania deputy attorney general said, “Those who made it happen were obviously in the position to know that it was going to happen and therefore could have sounded a warning alarm. The case against Cheney is more powerful than the case against Zacarias Moussaoui for willfully concealing advanced knowledge of the forthcoming 9/11 attack. No one is more culpable than the perpetrators. If Moussaoui deserves the death penalty, what does our Vice President deserve?”
If someone knows the mountain of evidence, including witnesses that shows the Twin towers and WTC7 were demolished with explosives. These buildings, all three, fell at free fall speed, no resistance, like in a vacuum.
“Anyone who has ever watched a building being demolished on purpose knows that if you’re going to do this you have to get at the under-infrastructure of the building to bring it down” -Peter Jennings, ABC News 9/11/2001
“If I were to bring the towers down, I would put explosives in the basement to get the weight of the building to help collapse the structure” -Mark Loizeaux, president, Controlled Demolition Inc.
“I said, ‘Chief, they’re evacuating the other building (WTC 1); right?’ He said, ‘No.’ … I said, ‘Why not? They blew up the other one.’ I thought they blew it up with a bomb. I said, ‘If they blew up the one, you know they’re gonna blow up the other one.” -William Reynolds – Firefighter
“We were the first ones in the second tower after the plane struck……On the last trip up a bomb went off.-Firefighter Louie Cachhioli
Firefighters describing the collapse of the north tower- “…boom -boom -boom- boom -boom, floor by floor it just started popping out… It was if, it was like if they had detonators in them…”
Eye witness 9/11- ”It sounded like gun fire, bang-bang-bang-bang-bang and then three explosions”
EMT Gregg Brady (Nov 1st, 2001)- “I heard three explosions, I look up and the north tower is coming down now.”
Paramedic Kevin Darnowski (Nov 9th, 2001)- “I heard three explosions and then we heard like groaning and grinding and tower two started coming down.”
Fireman Frank Campagna (Dec 4th,2 001)- “You see three explosions and then the whole thing is coming down.”
The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009.
We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper.
Niels H. Harrit*,1, Jeffrey Farrer, 2, Steven E. Jones*,3, Kevin R. Ryan4, Frank M. Legge
5, Daniel Farnsworth2, Gregg Roberts 6, James R. Gourley, 7 and Bradley R. Larsen3
1 Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
3 S&J Scientific Co., Provo, UT, 84606, USA
4 9/11 Working Group of Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA
5 Logical Systems Consulting, Perth, Western Australia
6 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA
7 International Center for 9/11 Studies, Dallas, TX 75231, USA
Abstract: We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.
We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in significant numbers in dust associated with the World Trade Center destruction. We have applied SEM/XEDS and other methods to characterize the small-scale structure and chemical signature of these chips, especially of their red component. The red material is most interesting and has the following characteristics:
1. It is composed of aluminum, iron, oxygen, silicon and carbon. Lesser amounts of other potentially reactive elements are sometimes present, such as potassium, sulfur, lead, barium and copper.
2. The primary elements (Al, Fe, O, Si, C) are typically all present in particles at the scale of tens to hundreds of nanometers, and detailed XEDS mapping shows intimate mixing.
3. On treatment with methyl ethyl ketone solvent, some segregation of components occurred. Elemental aluminum became sufficiently concentrated to be clearly identified in the pre-ignition material.
4. Iron oxide appears in faceted grains roughly 100 nm across whereas the aluminum appears in thin platelike structures. The small size of the iron oxide particles qualifies the material to be characterized as nanothermite or super-thermite.
5. Analysis shows that iron and oxygen are present in a ratio consistent with Fe2O3. The red material in all four WTC dust samples was similar in this way. Iron oxide was found in the pre-ignition material whereas elemental iron was not.
6. From the presence of elemental aluminum and iron oxide in the red material, we conclude that it contains the ingredients of thermite.
7. As measured using DSC, the material ignites and reacts vigorously at a temperature of approximately 430 °C, with a rather narrow exotherm, matching fairly closely an independent observation on a known super-thermite sample. The low temperature of ignition and the presence of iron oxide grains less than 120 nm show that the material is not conventional thermite (which ignites at temperatures above 900 °C) but very likely a form of super-thermite.
8. After igniting several red/gray chips in a DSC run to 700 °C, we found numerous iron-rich spheres and spheroids in the residue, indicating that a very hightemperature reaction had occurred, since the iron-rich product clearly must have been molten to form these shapes. In several spheres, elemental iron was verified since the iron content significantly exceeded the oxygen content. We conclude that a high-temperature reduction-oxidation reaction has occurred in the heated chips, namely, the thermite reaction.
9. The spheroids produced by the DSC tests and by the flame test have an XEDS signature (Al, Fe, O, Si, C) which is depleted in carbon and aluminum relative to the original red material. This chemical signature strikingly matches the chemical signature of the spheroids produced by igniting commercial thermite, and also matches the signatures of many of the microspheres found in the WTC dust .
10. The carbon content of the red material indicates that an organic substance is present. This would be expected for super-thermite formulations in order to produce high gas pressures upon ignition and thus make them explosive. The nature of the organic material in these chips merits further exploration. We note that it is likely also an energetic material, in that the total energy release sometimes observed in DSC tests exceeds the theoretical maximum energy of the classic thermite reaction. Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.
This evidence shown here is comparable to a drop in an ocean to what all is there.If it brings up so many more questions and an internal strive for answers makes you a Truther, then, I am a Truther.
Bush and many others in government lied.
From the truthnews.info report titled, How much proof do you need.
President Bush stated, ” never did anybody’s thought process about how to protect America did we ever think that the evildoers would fly not one, but four commercial aircraft into precious U.S. targets never.”
Which we now know this comment was completely false.
1995 Operation Bojinka, planes were to be hijacked and flown into key structures in the United States according to a U.S. intelligence analysts shortly after the plot was uncovered. ” The World Trade Center, White House, Pentagon, Trans American Tower, and the Sears Tower were among the prominent structures that had been identified in the plans that we had decoded. [" From the Village Voice, 9/23/01" ]
Operation Bojinka was well-known within the U.S. government.
1998, the CIA reported Arab terrorists were planning to fly a bomb laden aircraft from a foreign country into the World Trade Center. [ N.Y. Times, 9/18/02, Senate Intelligence Committee, 9/18/02. ]
July 2001, the Egyptian government warned that al-Quaeda planned to assassinate Bush and other heads of state using ” an airplane stuffed with explosives. [ New York Times, 9/26/01.]
1999/2001, Britain warned the U.S. to expect multiple airline hijackings[ Sunday Herald, 5/19/02, June 2001] Germany warned that Middle Eastern terrorists were planning to hijack commercial aircraft and use them as weapons to attack American and Israeli symbols, which standout. [ " FOX News 5/17/02. ] A warning from Jordan that a major attack, with the code name ” Big Wedding” where aircraft would be used inside the U.S..
These are just a few of the prior warnings using aircraft that our government and Bush have known about.
In an act of desperation Bush made Henry Kissinger Chairman of the 9/11 commission, due too conflicts of interest and refusing to name the clients of his private consulting firm ‘Kissinger Associates’ Kissinger resigned 16 days after being appointed Kissinger was an adviser too the US oil company Unocal that had ties with the Taliban in Afghanistan.
Stanley Hilton was a senior adviser to Sen Bob Dole (R) and has personally known Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz for decades he said in an interview on the Alex Jones radio show…
“This (9/11) was all planned. This was a government-ordered operation. Bush personally signed the order. He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason and mass murder.” –Stanley Hilton
Below is the full manuscript.
Alex Jones interview of Stanley Hilton, attorney for 911 taxpayers’ lawsuit
AJ: He is back with us. He is former Bob Dole’s chief of staff, very successful counselor, lawyer. He represents hundreds of the victims families of 9/11. He is suing Bush for involvement in 9/11. Now a major Zogby poll out – half of New Yorkers think the government was involved in 9/11. And joining us for the next 35 minutes, into the next hour, is Stanley Hilton. Stanley, it’s great to have you on with us.
SH: Glad to be on.
AJ: We’ll have to recap this when we start the next hour, but just in a nutshell, you have a lawsuit going, you’ve deposed a lot of military officers. You know the truth of 9/11. Just in a nutshell, what is your case alleging?
SH: Our case is alleging that Bush and his puppets Rice and Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth, Tenet, were all involved not only in aiding and abetting and allowing 9/11 to happen but in actually ordering it to happen. Bush personally ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East. I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I went to school with some of these neocons. At the University of Chicago, in the late 60s with Wolfowitz and Feith and several of the others and so I know these people personally. And we used to talk about this stuff all of the time. And I did my senior thesis on this very subject – how to turn the U.S. into a presidential dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus Pearl Harbor event. So, technically this has been in the planning at least 35 years.
AJ: That’s right. They were all Straussian followers of a Nazi-like professor. And now they are setting it up here in America. Stanley, I know you deposed a lot of people and you’ve got your $7 million dollar lawsuit with hundreds of the victim’s families involved.
SH: 7 billion, 7 billion
AJ: Yeah, 7 billion. Can you go over some of the new and incriminating evidence you’ve got of them ordering the attack?
SH: Yes, let me just say that this is a taxpayers’ class action lawsuit as well as a suit on behalf of the families and the basic three arguments are they violated the Constitution by ordering this event. And secondly that they [garbled] fraudulent Federal Claims Act, Title 31 of the U.S. Code in which Bush presented false and fraudulent evidence to Congress to get the Iraq war authorization. And, of course, he related it to 9/11 and claimed that Saddam was involved with that, and all these lies.
AJ: Tell you what, stay there. Stanley, we’ve got to break. Let’s come back and get into the evidence. BREAK
AJ: All right my friends, second hour, the anniversary of the globalist attack coming up. It’s an amazing individual we have on the line. Bob Dole’s former chief of staff, political scientist, a lawyer, he went to school with Rumsfeld and others, he wrote his thesis about how to turn America into a dictatorship using a fake Pearl Harbor attack. He’s suing the U.S. government for carrying out 9/11. He has hundreds of the victims’ families signing onto it – it’s a $7 billion lawsuit. And he is Stanley Hilton. I know that a lot of stations just joined us in Los Angeles and Rhode Island and Missouri and Florida and all over. Please sir, recap what you were just stating and then let’s get into the new evidence. And then we’ll get into why you are being harassed by the FBI, as other FBI people are being harassed who have been blowing the whistle on this. So, this is really getting serious. Stanley, tell us all about it.
SH: Yeah, we are suing Bush, Condoleezza Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Mueller, etc. for complicity in personally not only allowing 9/11 to happen but in ordering it. The hijackers we retained and we had a witness who is married to one of them. The hijackers were U.S. undercover agents. They were double agents, paid by the FBI and the CIA to spy on Arab groups in this country. They were controlled. Their landlord was an FBI informant in San Diego and other places. And this was a direct, covert operation ordered, personally ordered by George W. Bush. Personally ordered. We have incriminating evidence, documents as well as witnesses, to this effect. It’s not just incompetence – in spite of the fact that he is incompetent. The fact is he personally ordered this, knew about it. He, at one point, there were rehearsals of this. The reason why he appeared to be uninterested and nonchalant on September 11th – when those videos showed that Andrew Card whispered in his ear the [garbled] words about this he listened to kids reading the pet goat story, is that he thought this was another rehearsal. These people had dress-rehearsed this many times. He had seen simulated videos of this. In fact, he even made a Freudian slip a few months later at a California press conference when he said he had, quote, “seen on television the first plane attack the first tower.” And that could not be possible because there was no video. What it was was the simulated video that he had gone over. So this was a personally government-ordered thing. We are suing them under the Constitution for violating Americans’ rights, as well as under the federal Fraudulent Claims Act, for presenting a fraudulent claim to Congress to justify the bogus Iraq boondoggle war, for political gains. And also, under the RICO statute, under the Racketeering Corrupt Organization Act, for being a corrupt entity. And I’ve been harassed personally by the chief judge of the federal court who is instructing me personally to drop this suit, threatened to kick me off the court, after 30 years on the court. I’ve been harassed by the FBI. My staff has been harassed and threatened. My office has been broken into and this is the kind of government we are dealing with.
AJ: Absolutely and now it has come out – five separate drills of flying hijacked jets into buildings that morning – which you told us about before it even broke in the Associated Press. They were trying to get out ahead of you. You talked about how you interviewed military people who were told it was a drill that morning. Then to get out ahead of that, the news finally reported on it. Now, we’ve learned that all these operations – I want to get into that, I want to talk about the new incriminating evidence of ordering it and how they had drilled on this, how Cheney was in the bunker controlling this. That has even come out in the mainstream news but they won’t release the details of that, Stanley. But what type of FBI harassment are you going through? SH: First of all, my office was burglarized in San Francisco several months ago. Files were gone through and some files were seized – particularly the ones dealing with the lady that was married to one of the hijackers. Fortunately, I had spare copies in a hidden place so nothing disappeared permanently. But more significantly, FBI agents have been harassing one of my staff members and threatening them with vague but frightening threats of indicting them. And it’s just total harassment. They have planted a spy, an undercover agent, in my organization, as we just recently discovered. In other words, these are Nazi Germany tactics. This is the kind of government you have in this country. This is what Bush is all about.
AJ: Stay there, Stanley, Bob Dole’s former chief of staff. We’ll come back after this quick break. Please stay with us. BREAK
AJ: All right, eight minutes, 25 seconds into the second hour. Stanley Hilton, political scientist, lawyer, Bob Dole’s former chief of staff, is suing the government for 7 billion dollars for carrying out 9/11 and for
racketeering. And he joins us now. During the break, I first really did the big interview with Stanley Hilton after I saw him attacked on Fox News. And that interview got massive attention. And then he kind of went underground for a while because a judge, we’re going to talk about that, ordered him to not do any more interviews. And now he’s back doing interviews. He’s had his office broken into, FBI threats and harassment. Bottom line, he has deposed military individuals, wives of hijackers, you name it, it was a government operation. It has even come out in mainstream news, a piece here, a piece there. They had drills on 9/11, that’s why NORAD stood down. Cheney was in control of the whole thing. Stanley Hilton has now gotten documents about how Bush ordered the whole operation. And I’ll tell you right now, his life is in danger, folks. And he’s got so much courage. He went to school with these neocons at the University of Chicago. He wrote his thesis on how the government could use terrorist attacks to set up martial law. He is the man for the time and folks wondered why he disappeared for a while and just did his lawsuit and wasn’t doing interviews, it was because he was ordered to. Stanley, can you get into that for us?
SH: I did an interview with you, Alex, about a year and a half ago, and literally two weeks after that, I was contacted by the emissary of the chief judge of the federal court where I have the lawsuit. And I was warned not to publicize it but to keep it quiet and threatened with discipline. And it remained quiet until a couple of months ago and then I got on the air on some programs and some publicity and July 1st, I was threatened directly by the chief judge here, threatened with court discipline. This particular judge has been circulating communiqués to the other federal judges seeking anything negative she can get against me to try and discipline me after I’ve been on the court here for 30 years with no disciplinary problems at all. This is suddenly happening. And her assistants who are on the committee of the court met with me on July 1st in Palo Alto, California, and threatened me directly. They handed me a copy of the lawsuit and said that the judge wants me to dismiss this. What’s this? She doesn’t like the content of it. This is politically incorrect. This is outside the norm. I said I represented more than 400 plaintiffs, how am I going to dismiss this case? And they threatened me directly and they said, “the next time you’ll be disciplined.” And also they’ve threatened me not to go public, etc. And this is just outrageous.
AJ: It’s all color of law. No direct orders, just all in your face.
SH: They sent a letter out, and of course they deny it’s because of the political content of the suit but they told me directly on the phone that it is because of this suit and this judge is very, very angry, apparently has been in contact with Ashcroft’s Justice Department. I got a call from Ashcroft’s Justice Department a few months ago about this, demanding that I drop the suit, threatening sanctions and all kinds of things. I refused to drop it. AJ: Now let’s go back over, you had them break into your office, harassment. Let’s go over that in detail.
SH: My office was broken into about 6 months ago. The file cabinets – it was obvious they had been rifled through. Files were stolen. Files dealing with this particular case and particularly with the documents I had regarding the fact that the – some of these hijackers, at least some of them were on the payroll of the U.S. government as undercover FBI, CIA, double agents. They are spying on Arab groups in the U.S. And, in effect, all this led up to the effect that al Qaeda is a creation of the George Bush administration, basically. That the entity that he called al Qaeda is directly linked to George Bush. And all this stuff was stolen. Fortunately, I had copies. But this was just part of the harassment. The FBI has also been harassing some of my assistants and has planted a spy in our midst. And it is just outrageous that these Nazi tactics are being used – and the obstruction of justice, these people are criminals. And that’s what’s happening under the tremendous pressure here to just drop it. Or to shut up now and just go away.
AJ: Now, let’s talk about what they want you to drop. Let’s talk about, without giving names, the people you deposed, what really happened, the picture you’ve got. You said earlier that Bush ordered this, they were simulating this which they now admit there were simulations on that morning. Let’s go over what they don’t want you to talk about, Stanley.
SH: We have evidence both documentary as well as witness sworn statements from undercover former FBI agents, FBI informants, etc., that other officials in the Pentagon and the military and the Air Force that deal with the fact that there were many drills, many rehearsals for 9/11 before it happened. Bush had seen this simulated on TV many times. He blurted this out at a press conference in California a few months after 9/11 where he said he had, quote, seen the first plane hit the first building on the video. And that’s not possible because there was no official video of that. There was one of the second plane not the first one. He had seen the first one. We do have some incriminating documents that Bush personally ordered 9/11 events. It was well planned. A FEMA official has admitted on tape that he was there the night before – September 10th, that is
AJ: And now Mayor Giuliani, a few months ago in the 911 Commission, admitted that – Tripod II. They had their whole command post already moved out of Building 7. Now, this is very, very important. This is a key area of this whole event. You said months before it came out on the CIA’s own website and the Associated Press, you said I deposed people. They said there were drills that morning and exactly what happened, happening – that was the smoke-screen for the stand-down. And then to get out ahead of it, the CIA comes out and said yeah we were running a drill that morning. Now, we’ve learned that five, possibly six, were confirmed. Five of these – one drill with the exact same thing happening that actually happened, at the exact same time in the morning. That’s why NORAD stood down with 24 different blips on the screen. You’ve said this. You brought this up first. Now, I know you can’t get too much into detail but can you tell us how you learned of this?
SH: I have interviewed individuals in NORAD and the Air Force. I personally toured NORAD many years ago around the time that I worked for Dole. I’m very familiar with the operations at Cheyenne Mountain at Colorado Springs, where NORAD is. Individuals that work in NORAD as well as the Air Force have stated this, off the record, but the point is, yes, this was not just five drills but at least 35 drills over at least two months before September 11th. Everything was planned, the exact location
AJ: But five drills that day.
SH: That day, that day, and Bush thought it was a drill. That’s the only explanation for why he appeared nonchalant
AJ: We also had NORAD officers and civilian air traffic controllers going, “Is this part of the exercise? Is this a drill?”
AJ: On the tapes and in TV interviews, they thought it was, quote, a drill.
SH: That’s right. That’s exactly what I said long before it became public. I’ve known about this since earlier in March of ’03, as I stated before. This was all planned. This was a government-ordered operation. Bush personally signed the order. He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason and mass murder. And now, obstruction of justice by attempting to use a federal judge and FBI agents to inhibit a legitimate civil lawsuit in this country, in federal court. Even a chief judge in this court tried to harass and threaten me personally for representing legitimate plaintiffs. And they got Clinton for allegedly lying under oath about Paula Jones and now – look what’s happening now. And Ken Starr used to be across from me in Duke Law School in the early `70s and it´s interesting that he got away with trying to get Clinton impeached, so we have a far worse criminal sitting in the oval office today – somebody guilty of mass murder as well as obstruction of justice.
AJ: Well, I mean look, they say they never heard of a plan to fly planes into buildings – said it all over television – Rice, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft. And then we find out they were running all these drills that morning. Even if they weren’t involved, that proves they were liars about ever hearing of such a plan.
SH: Well, I’m trying to take their depositions – I’ve been trying to ake their depositions or months. They’ve been trying to object to it. They will have to admit they were either lying then or now. It’s clearly perjury either way. They are liars and perjurers; that’s what they are. These are the people that we have running this government and, of course, they knew about it. How are they going to claim now that they didn’t know about these drills? Their idea is that nobody knew anything. It’s the old know-nothing mentality. And how anybody considers this believable is beyond me.
AJ: All right, now people ask how could a huge organization, how could the AWACs, how could the military let this happen; whereas before, if your Cessna got off course for five minutes, they would launch F-16s on you. It’s real simple. It’s what Stanley Hilton said here a year and a half ago. It’s what came out in the news after that. The military, good people, were told this was all a drill. And it was not a drill. And ABC News admits that Cheney was in control of [?] out of the White House [?] and that he ordered the military to quote “do something.” Our inside sources from Hilton and others say it was a stand down and they admit they will not release that under national security. Stanley?
SH: Well they are going to admit it, they’re going to release it in the court case because if you demand it under subpoena powers and they must release it. And part of our lawsuit is brought in the name of the U.S. because under the federal fraudulent [Claims Act], we accuse the Bush Administration of presenting a fraudulent claim to Congress. And under the statutes of Title 31 of the U.S. code, they must release this information. That’s why they are trying to threaten me, harass me, invade my office, steal my files, commit blatant obstruction of justice and other crimes to try and prevent a legitimate civil suit from exposing these criminals and their acts of treason and mass murder.
AJ: I think you need to publicly tell folks that you are not planning suicide. Would you like to tell folks that?
SH: (laughs) I’m not planning suicide. I’ve got family and I’m not planning that but I don’t like the threats I’m under – but I can tell you this, it’s taking a toll emotionally on me and my staff. And particularly, when you get a threat from the chief judge of your own court.
AJ: Why have you decided to go public again after a year of being under the radar? SH: Because the more and more evidence that I’ve been adducing over a year and a half has made it so obvious to me that this was now without any doubt a government operation and that it amounts to the biggest act of treason and mass murder in American history. I mean George Bush makes Benedict Arnold look like a patriot. He makes Benedict Arnold look like George Washington. I mean that’s what we have – a criminal and a traitor sitting in the White House pretending he’s a patriot, wrapping himself in the flag. And it’s pretty disgusting because the other side of the so-called opposition, the Kerry camp is just saying nothing because they’re afraid to speak.
AJ: Stay right there. We’ll be right back.
AJ: Stanley Hilton will be with us for another 15 or 16 minutes. Then he’s got to go into court. Bob Dole’s former chief of staff, political scientist, lawyer, represents 400 plus plaintiffs – most of them victims of 9/11. When I was in New York last week, everybody I was talking to, I mean 90 plus percent of them at ground zero – “I had family, I worked in the buildings, my son’s a Navy Seal – he called the night before and said don’t go to work.” You know, all of this, and then now they never had any idea – and it turns out they had all these drills – and one drill of hijacked jets flying into the World Trade Center and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning. That morning – come on people! And Stanley Hilton brought all this out on this show before it was in the mainstream news. And I was talking to him during the break. I mean, the harassment, the moles, the threatening of his staff, the judge threatening him. Stanley, let’s get specifically into the documents that you have now got that they have now been robbing you for, that you luckily, thank God had copies. Specifically, Bush ordering this. Can you get into that for us – ordering 9/11? SH: National Security Council classified documents which [garbled] and it’s was part of a series of documents that were involved with the drill documents. This was all planned – they had it on videotape. These planes were controlled by remote control, as I stated previously a year and a half ago, there’s a system called Cyclops. There is a computer chip in the nose of the plane and it enables the ground control, the military ground control, to disable the pilot’s control of the plane and to control it and to fly it directly into those towers. That’s what happened. It’s also a technology used on what’s called the Global Hawk, which is an aircraft drone – a remote- controlled aircraft. And they were doing it. We are talking about National Security Council classified documents that clearly indicated that [garbled] had a green light to order this to go and this is no drill. These drills that were running were clearly a dress rehearsal and this was a government operation. You wonder why these people are trying to threaten people and trying to intimidate people who have written this suit, I guess if you murdered 3000 of your own citizens, in conjunction with the corrupt Royal family of Saudi Arabia as Bush did. And if you then waste billions more on a worthless garbage war in Iraq, I guess you’ve got something to worry about and you want to threaten people to prevent it from coming out.
AJ: I mean let’s look at this. Not only are there dress rehearsals, they are smoke screens so the good military stands down and doesn’t know what’s happening. But it’s now coming out, even in mainstream news, that yes these drills were going on. Yes, and some of these drills, quote, passenger-type jets were under remote control – this is decades old technology. In 1958, NORAD was [ ] old jets and using them for target practice. Decades ago they flew jumbo jets from LA to Sidney Australia. So since that’s going on, everybody knows that. And it’s the same MO. Just like the first World Trade Center [bombing] where they get two retarded men who followed this blind sheik who had a tiny mosque above a pizza parlor. And they set them up as the patsies. Then the FBI cooks the bomb, trains the drivers. This informant goes, “You’re not going to bomb the building? They go “Yeah, we’re letting it go forward.” He tapes them to protect themselves. The two retarded gentlemen, thank God, didn’t park it up against the column, as the FBI instructed them to do, so it didn’t bring down the tower – because you have to be right up against the column. That doesn’t happen. Yet, it’s the same thing with 9/11. You’ve got these CIA agents, these Arabs, who were trained at U.S. military bases, Pensacola Naval Air Station – mainstream media, out creating their legends for this background. They’re on board the aircraft. My military sources say nerve gas kills everybody on board the plane – nerve gas packets. Then they fly the planes into buildings. From your inside sources, is that accurate?
SH: It’s one of the things that we are looking into – that nerve gas or something else disabled people. It’s possible. I can’t say for sure to be honest with you
AJ: All you know is they were government agents and they were on board and the planes were remote controlled.
SH: Yeah, it was basically a smokescreen. I mean, the events of the hijackings, how someone snuck in those cutters, it was a plant. It was like a classic decoy. I’ve got some military background. And it’s called decoy. It’s a decoy operation. You make the people focus on the decoy to avoid looking at the real criminals. So they are focusing on these so-called nineteen hijackers and saying, “Oh, it must have been these Arabs. When, in fact, the guilty person is at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue – sitting in the oval office. That’s the guilty person. That’s the one who authorized it. There is only one man who could have authorized this operation and that’s Bush. And anyone at NORAD will tell you as I have been told personally at NORAD in the war control room, there is only one man who has he power to do this kind of thing and that’s Bush. Even though many believe he’s a puppet. And I think in many ways he is. The fact of the matter is where was [ ] Cheney, Rumsfeld and these other traitors. The fact is Bush personally ordered and he’s guilty and liable and he’s going to be re-elected apparently because the media’s asleep and [garbled] for Bush. AJ: Well, the media is owned by the same military industrial complex that carried out the attacks.
SH: Yeah, the media is only interested in maintaining the official government fantasy that this was a little lone Arab. These Arabs couldn’t even steer that plane down a runway.
AJ: Stay there Stanley, final segment coming up. BREAK
AJ: Mr. Hilton, when you talk to these FBI agents, when you talk to these military men and women, what’s their attitude? They’ve got to be pretty freaked out to have the big picture and know what actually happened on 9/11.
SH: Yes, you know it’s like clouds just before a thunderstorm in the sense that they are sort of pregnant with rage. They are just enraged at the criminal politicians who have perverted and misused the government to murder its own citizens and pursue these dubious political ends. And many of them, in increasing numbers, are willing to talk and will talk under subpoena – but only under subpoena because the official party line of the government is shut up and don’t talk to the trial lawyer. But more and more, they are very outraged that part of the government has done this to its own people, to its own people. I mean you have to go back to Stalin to see something – not even Hitler did this to his own people. You have to look at Stalin who murdered the Kulaks, the Russians for his own dubious gains. Also we’ve got – we have a Stalinist mentality in this country. And, if these people pose as patriots and wrap themselves in the flag, it’s disgusting. I wanted also to point out that the Japanese television network, Asahi, is going to be airing a special on primetime tomorrow, on September 11th. They interviewed me for eight hours a couple of weeks ago. I’ll be on that. I wish – of course, the America media don’t care so they are not going to care. But in Japan, people are very serious in interviewing me and others. And we have a website now, called deprogram.info, if more people are interested: www.deprogram.info. But the other thing, I just wanted to say that if anything happens to me – and I don’t know why – because I’m being threatened here now. And it seems you can’t bring a case in this country anymore against criminals in power without being threatened. And this is how they operate. The stakes are pretty high when you’ve got a world historical level of treason and fraud by this government against it’s own people. I guess this is what you have to expect.
AJ: Stanley, the globalists, the new world order crowd, definitely intend to carry out more terror attacks. I know they would have carried out more attacks if we wouldn’t have done what we’ve been up to, if you wouldn’t have been out there boldly speaking out and many others. And then their electronic Berlin wall has a bunch of cracks in it now. Thanks to good people like yourself and many others who are speaking out and telling the truth. But do you think that they may carry out what they’ve been hyping – a suitcase nuke attack, a biological release to try to smokescreen all of this? I know it’s a catch 22, you’ve got to expose the murderers. We’ve got to get the word out on this but some government people that I’ve talk to say, “Yeah, but if you do that, they are going to go even more hard core and must totally try to take over.” But I say regardless, they are already doing that. So what do you say to that?
SH: Well, yeah, I think they have an agenda. They have contingency plans. I think they are laying low now because there are an increasing number of people, like myself, who are openly challenging them and accusing them of criminal conduct. I think they would have done it again if we had not spoken up. I think they’re planning, what they would like to do is silence any dissenters. That’s why we are trying to get the Patriot Act declared unconstitutional in this lawsuit also.
AJ: Let’s talk about polls. In the beginning a patriot is a scarce man, hated and feared, but in time when his cause succeeds, the timid join him, because then it costs nothing to be a patriot. You are one of those guys who hit the barbwire for us, or figuratively jumped on the hand grenade for America. But when you’ve got a Zogby poll, who is highly respected, half of New Yorkers believe that the government was involved. When you have a Canadian poll, 63% on average believe that the U.S. government was involved. And some groups, as high as 76% in polls believe the government was involved. European polls, two- thirds show the same thing. We have German defense ministers and technology ministers and another member of their government now, three of them going public, known conservatives, and progressives. You have an environment minister, Michael Meacher, saying that if they didn’t do it, they sure as hell knew what was going on. Look, if anybody who is a thinking person looks at the evidence, their official story is impossible. Then you investigate and they are involved in it. Comments to this massive awakening and what’s happening.
SH: Well, I think that’s why they want the Patriot Act to suppress political dissent. They have to, they’re anticipating, they are not dumb individuals. I know these people personally, Wolfowitz. These are criminal individuals but they are smart and so they anticipated political dissent. And that’s why, like the Nazis, their forebears, and their blood brothers, the Nazis and the Stalinists, they’re all for political repression. Every corrupt and criminal government has done this – they suppress their own people: Nazi Germany, Communist Russia, Mao Tse-Tung, that’s why we have the Patriot Act. So it’s hand in hand. They had it planned to go right up to September 11th, this was all part of the plan. You have to do it. It was part of my senior thesis. You must follow through the terrorists attacks with a political suppression mechanism in the law. And that’s why they want Patriot I and Patriot II and their plans are to continue launching more terrorist attacks to justify even more repression. The goal is to make this a one party dictatorship in this country, to pursue their dubious ends with their blood brothers like the Saudi Royal family. And also, historical blood brothers, such as the Nazi Germany and the Communist Russian. That’s the goal
AJ: You’ve got to go in just a minute or two. But I wanted to also tell you about New York. Sound cannons that are used in Iraq, they’re against us. Men in black ski masks. 41,000 police, accredited media being arrested randomly. Children being arrested, people in wheelchairs, 2000 plus people put in a camp with barbwire fences inside with no bathrooms. You had to have permission to go to the porta-potties. Police screaming at you. It had nothing to do with terrorism. They are openly setting the precedent for martial law.
SH: Well, that’s right, the word terrorist is now being overly broad and overly defined [garbled] and also, you know, it’s like the word communist was used for anything during the McCarthy witch hunt. And anybody can be called a terrorist by Bush’s definition. But the irony is that the number one terrorist in the world is living at the White House at the oval office today. That’s the real irony. For sheer hypocrisy, I think he deserves the world prize and ought to be in the Ripley book, Believe It or Not, and the Guinness book of world records for sheer brazen chicanery and fraud.
AJ: Let me ask you a question on this because this is the experience that I had. Watching television, watching the killers, watching those that are guilty, stand up there as our saviors is incredibly painful. It’s like watching Ted Bundy being the judge at his own trial. I mean it is just painful to know who these people are. To see them putting America in a shredder. Now we are going to have forced psychological testing of every American, forced drugging, you know Pan-American unions, I mean it’s just all happening, it’s in our face, Stanley.
SH: Yeah, it’s very disturbing and as one who has studied the theory and concept of dictatorships, I personally interviewed Albert Speer, who was Hitler’s armaments minister. I interviewed him in 1981 in Munich. And I’ve studied the psychology and history of totalitarianism and there is no question that it’s very frightening. And it has, today, with high technology, albeit for the first time in history, the chance of having a world empire dominated by corrupt, technologically oriented government – an elite government. And they’ve got now what people like Napoleon and Hitler didn’t have, which is the technological means to dominate not only their own country but others – the world.
AJ: The answer is to expose them as the terrorists, to show how PNAC [Project for the New American Century] said we need helpful Pearl Harbor events, to show how Northwoods called for the exact 9/11-style attacks, to show their own plans. And to force people to face this horror. What are they going to do in a year or two when 80% of us, not half of us, know the truth?
SH: Well, that’s why they want repression and, then again, the ancient old diversion, launch another terrorist attack to get people to pitch it away. I mean who knows what they’ll do next. I mean their capacity for ingenious creation of these events is sort of unraveled. I mean there is no limit. My guess is they are going to try another stunt – maybe a stunt just before the election to justify getting Bush reelected. Although it seems like he is running against a straw man or a ghost right now, anyway. But, my guess is they’ll try some other tactic to get people’s attention away from 9/11 if it gets to be too much attention. What you really want is for the public to just lose interest because the public – and it’s like remember the Alamo, you know, people don’t forget things like that. To me it’s like the Alamo, remember 9/11, that ought to be the slogan for this outrageous act of treason. That’s what it is. It’s not
AJ: We are at a crossroads, I don’t think they anticipated this much resistance, Stanley.
SH: Yeah, I hope they are truly wrong and as incompetent as they are corrupt and guilty. That means their incompetence is exceeded only by their corruption and their guilt. And eventually, if enough people are going to get outraged enough, these people in the bureaucracy and in the civil service and our military, and eventually we can get people under subpoena these individuals will be exposed.
AJ: Stanley, their whole operation hinges on us being naïve and not recognizing evil. This is what they got with Hitler and others. People couldn’t recognize evil so they continued to repeat succumbing to it. We are recognizing it this time. We are putting our lives, our treasure, our future on the line for freedom because we cannot let these blood-thirsty control freak terrorists capture us and use us and turn us into the empire and have a draft and use us as their slaves to invade the planet. And that’s their PNAC plan. Stanley Hilton, I know you’ve got to get to court. God bless you. I want to thank you for being here with us today. Can we get you back on next week?
SH: Sure, just give me a call.
AJ: God bless you my friend. Any closing comments?
SH: My closing comments would be, I think people ought to just think about the consequence of having someone like Bush in the White House and the danger for the future that these sorts of individuals pose. This is not just a historical event of the past. This is part of the plan and the camera is still rolling. They have an agenda. These individuals are extremely dangerous. They are armed and dangerous. They pose a clear and dangerous threat to every freedom-loving person not only American but in the whole world.
AJ: You are absolutely right Stanley Hilton. They have captured the government. They have not captured the peoples’ minds and they are counting on us not facing up to it.
SH: And they are counting on the repressive Patriot Act and threats and chief judges and FBI agents threatening people who are exposing them. That’s what they are counting on.
AJ: But you’re not backing down are you, my friend.
SH: No, I’m not
AJ: Well, we all stand with you, my brother, and God bless you.
SH: All right. Thank you.
Iraq no involvement with 911, truth denied
There is no connection between 9-11 and Iraq. Oct 5th, 2004 Cheney- “The Senator has his facts wrong, I have not suggested there is a connection between Iraq and 9/11.” Bush- “We have had no evidence Saddam was involved with Sept 11th”
The 19 highjackers bull
“Their names were flashed around the world as suicide hijackers who carried out the attacks on America. But yesterday four innocent men told how their identities had been stolen. The men – all from Saudi Arabia – spoke of their shock at being mistakenly named by the FBI as suicide terrorists. None of the four was in the United States on September 11 and all are alive in their home country. The Telegraph obtained the first interviews with the men since they learnt that they were on the FBI’s list of hijackers who died in the crashes in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania. All four said that they were “outraged” to be identified as terrorists. One has never been to America and another is a Saudi Airlines pilot who was on a training course in Tunisia at the time of the attacks. Saudi Airlines said it was considering legal action against the FBI for seriously damaging its reputation and that of its pilots.”
Prior knowledge stock market put options on United and American airlines, truth denied.
It is a fact that prior warnings were given to the United States by Britain, Egypt, Germany, France, Argentina, Russia and Jordan. Even the aid to the foreign minister for the Taliban told the BBC in Sept 2002 that he warned both the American consulate in Pakistan and the United Nations.
In the days before 9/11 the ratio of shares sold to those bought (put call options) for United Airlines stock was 12:1 instead of the normal 1:1. Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley, both housed in the World Trade Center also had highly unusual put/call ratios.
There were numerous American officials, even Congressmen who claimed some received warnings from higher levels not to fly on Sept.11.
Everything going on today was planned years in advance and written about by US think
Our government lied about everything to say the least to take control of the middle east
Jeffrey Steinberg- Executive Intelligence Review, wrote in his report from Oct 2003, titled- “Cheney Behind New Mideast War Drive:”
Return of `Clean Break’
“Turn the clock back seven years. On July 8, 1996, Richard Perle, currently a member, and formerly the head of the Defense Policy Board in the Don Rumsfeld Pentagon, delivered a document to the new Israeli Prime Minister, Jabotinskyite Benjamin Netanyahu. Perle, and a team of American neo-cons, had been tasked by Netanyahu—through the Israeli think tank, the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS)—to draft a strategy for abrogating the Oslo Accords and overturning the entire concept of “comprehensive land for peace,” in favor of a jackboot policy of U.S.-Israeli-Turkish raw military conquest and occupation.”
“The short policy memo, which Netanyahu, and his successor-Likud Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, totally adopted as the core strategy of their administrations, spelled out a four-pronged attack on the peace process and the entire Arab world. It has become a self-evident truth that, since the Bush “43″ and Sharon governments came into power simultaneously in early 2001, “A Clean Break” has been the guiding strategic doctrine of both—particularly following the irregular warfare attacks on New York and Washington on Sept. 11, 2001.”
“The Perle-Wurmser policy document demanded: 1) Destroy Yasser Arafat and the Palestinian Authority, blaming them for every act of Palestinian terrorism, including the attacks from Hamas, an organization which Sharon had helped launch during his early 1980s tenure as Minister of Defense. 2) Induce the United States to overthrow the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq. Launch war against Syria after Saddam’s regime is disposed of, including striking Syrian military targets in Lebanon, and targets in Syria proper. 4) Parlay the overthrow of the Ba’athist regimes in Baghdad and Damascus into the “democratization” of the entire Arab world, including through further military actions against Iran, Saudi Arabia, and “the ultimate prize,” Egypt .”
“On Oct. 5, for the first time in 30 years, Israel launched bombing raids against Syria, targetting a purported “Palestinian terrorist camp” inside Syrian territory. The bombing immediately raised fears that Sharon is preparing a nuclear strike, most likely against Iran. A senior Israeli intelligence source told EIR that Sharon’s action was clearly backed by the “pro-Sharon” crowd in Washington, led by Vice President Dick Cheney and Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz: “They continue to be committed to their basic plan: Destroy Iran and Syria, and make Israel the dominant power in the region, and drive the Palestinians across the Jordan River.” The source added that there “is obviously an agreement in Washington to do nothing.” In a press conference a day after the Israel attack on Syria, President George W. Bush said Sharon had the right to “defend his own people,” and then added, “We would be doing the same thing.”
9/11, Oil pipelines, Enron and John O Niel death/coverup, connection
“WTC7 housed the Securities and Exchange Commission, which was investigating Enron. Late 2001 was the time of “the height of the investigation into Enron, so the majority of Enron’s SEC filings were likely destroyed when World Trade Center 7 came down.” -”Barry Zwicker, The 9/11 News Special You Never Saw”
In 1990 the US oil companies decided they wanted the Caspian Sea Basin, it holds 1/8th of the worlds oil. These companies headed by Unocal, hired Enron to come up with figures on the cost to run an oil and gas pipeline thru Afghanistan. Dyncorp, Bechtel, General Electric and State Electricity Board are others who were negotiating with the Taliban on the pipeline.
John O’Neill, New Yorks FBI chief of counter terrorism discovered an al Qaeda document in 1998 verifying secret dealings between Enron and the Taliban. John resigned shortly before Sept 11th. John was distraught over being repeatedly blocked and ordered not to investigate the Saudi-Taliban-Afghan oil connections and not pursue his al Qaeda project. Vice President Dick Cheney was the alleged blocker. John O’Neill was given a new job as head of security at the World Trade Center. John was killed the first day at his new job, 9/11.
Enron officials and shareholders such as Rumsfeld pursuing the Enron India project were included in Vice President Dick Cheney secret “Energy Task Force”
Bethany McLean after reading the Enron’s 10-K report and finding “strange transactions”, “erratic cash flow”, and “huge debt” wrote an article for Fortune “Is Enron Overpriced?” questioning Enron’s high stock value, and why it was trading at 55 times its earnings and that analysts and investors did not know where Enron’s income was coming from.
Kenneth Lay the founder of Enron, merging two natural gas pipeline companies, Houston Natural Gas and InterNorth. Lay was instrumental in the deregulation of selling natural gas which in turn gave free rain to companies the likes of Enron to sell energy at higher prices.
On July 7, 2004, Lay was indicted by a grand jury on 11 counts of securities fraud and related charges. On January 31, 2006, following four and a half years of preparation by government prosecutors, Lay’s and Skilling’s trial began in Houston. Lay was found guilty on May 25, 2006, of 10 counts against him; the judge dismissed the 11th. Because each count carried a maximum 5- to 10-year sentence, legal experts said Lay could have faced 20 to 30 years in prison. However, he died while vacationing in Snowmass, Colorado on July 5, 2006, about three and a half months before his scheduled October 23 sentencing. Preliminary autopsy reports state that he died of a heart attack caused by coronary artery disease. As a result of his death, on October 17, 2006, the federal district court judge who presided over the case vacated Lay’s conviction. On October 17, 2006, since Lay died prior to exhausting his appeals, his conviction was abated. Precedent in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the federal appellate court governing the district where Lay was indicted, indicates that abatement had to be automatically granted. When abatement occurs, the law views it as though he had never been indicted, tried and convicted.
Lay’s death has given rise to various conspiracy theories. Prominent suspicions include the timing of his death (while awaiting sentencing in a case several colleagues had already been convicted for), the fact that he was on vacation in a rural and unpopulated part of Colorado, the cremation of his body after death, and his close relationship with the Bush family. His autopsy report also contains an error concerning his date of death
Kenneth Lay background
Worked at Exxon Mobil Corp
Worked in the early 1970s as a federal energy regulator. He then became undersecretary for the Department of the Interior before he returned to the business world as an executive at Florida Gas Transmission.
Was on the board of directors of Eli Lilly and Company.
Was one of America’s highest-paid CEO’s, earning a $42.4 million compensation package in 1999. In December 2000, Lay was mentioned as a possible candidate for President Bush’s Treasury secretary
Lay dumped large amounts of his Enron stock in September and October 2001 as its price fell, while encouraging employees to buy more stock, telling them the company would rebound.
Investors lost more than $60 billion in the collapse of Enron
What Congress Does Not Know about Enron and 9/11
It is time for Congress to face the truth: In order to give Enron one last desperate chance to complete the Taliban pipeline and save itself from bankruptcy, senior levels of US intelligence were ordered to keep their eyes shut and their subordinates ignorant.
By Atty. John J. Loftus a former federal prosecutor, John Loftus had an insider’s knowledge of high level intelligence operations, including obstruction of Congressional investigations. Loftus resigned from the Justice Department in 1981 to expose how the intelligence community had recruited Nazi war criminals and then concealed the files from Congressional subpoena. After appearing on an Emmy Award winning segment of 60 Minutes, Loftus has spent the next two decades writing histories of intelligence cover-ups, and serving as an unpaid lawyer helping other whistleblowers inside US intelligence.
First published May, 2003:
A captured Al Qaida document reveals that US energy companies were secretly negotiating with the Taliban to build a pipeline. The document was obtained by the FBI but was not allowed to be shared with other agencies in order to protect Enron. Multiple sources confirm that American law enforcement agencies were deliberately kept in the dark and systematically prevented from connecting the dots before 9/11 in order to aid Enron’s secret and immoral Taliban negotiations.
The suppressed Al Qaida document tends to support recent claims of a cover-up made by several mid-level intelligence and law enforcement figures. Their ongoing terrorist investigations appear to have been hindered during the same sensitive time period while the Enron Corporation was still negotiating with the Taliban. An inadvertent result of the Taliban pipeline cover-up was that the Taliban’s friends in Al Qaida were able to complete their last eight months of preparations for 9/11 while the Enron secrecy block was still in force.
Although the latest order to block investigations allegedly resulted from Enron’s January 2002 appeal to Vice President Dick Cheney, it appears that there were at least three previous block orders, each building upon the other, stretching back for decades and involving both Republican and Democratic administrations.
The first block came in the 1970’s, as a result of Congressional reaction to domestic espionage against the anti-Vietnam war movement. In a case of blatant over-reaction, the FBI placed all houses of worship and religious charities off-limits for any surveillance whatsoever unless there was independent probable cause. This meant that all Mosques and other Muslim meeting places for terrorist groups were effectively off limits until after a crime had been committed. The block order was not lifted until last week by Atty. General Ashcroft.
The second block order, in force since the 1980’s, was against any investigation that would embarrass the Saudi Royal family. Originally, it was designed to conceal Saudi support for Muslim extremists fighting against the Soviets in Afghanistan and Chechnya, but it went too far. Oliver North noted in his autobiography, that every time he tried to do something about terrorism links in the Middle East, he was told to stop because it might embarrass the Saudis. This block remains in place.
As the combined result of these two blocks, the Saudis were able to fund middle eastern terrorists in complete secrecy during the 1990’s through a network of Muslim charities in Virginia, Tampa and Florida. The Saudi funding network was targeted at the destruction of the State of Israel and the obstruction of the Palestinian peace process.
The Saudi funding conduit has now been exposed and shut down by means of a private lawsuit, Loftus vs. Sami Al Arian, which is currently pending in Hillsborough County, Florida. The lawsuit, filed on March 20, 2002, influenced the government into raiding the Saudi charities in Herndon, Virginia, a few hours later.
After filing the Al-Arian lawsuit, Attorney Loftus began to receive very detailed documents and information about a third block: a prohibition on investigations concerning the Taliban. In the early 1990’s, a consortium of American oil companies (lead by Unocal) had hired Enron to determine the profitability of building an oil and gas pipeline across Afghanistan so that America could have access to the Caspian Sea Basin, holding 1/8th of the worlds energy supplies.
There is no doubt that these secret negotiations existed, and that they were known to Al Qaida. Loftus recently received an FBI translation of a highly classified and encrypted Al Qaida document, circa 1997-1998, which was retrieved and decrypted from a computer laptop following the Embassy bombing in Africa. The document was written by Usama Bin Laden’s military commander, Mohammed Atef, under his nom de guerre, Abu Haf, and reveals extensive knowledge of the supposedly secret pipeline negotiations, and their potential economic worth to the Taliban, Pakistan and the U.S.
Former Afghanistan CIA agent Robert Baer has recently published a book charging that the cover-up of the 1990’s pipeline negotiations revealed extensive financial corruption inside the Clinton administration, and contributed to the lack of intelligence before 9/11. The Taliban negotiations temporarily collapsed in 1999 after Clinton reversed his NSC advisor’s policy, and ordered a missile strike against terrorists in Afghanistan.
However, in January 2001, Vice President Cheney allegedly reinstated the intelligence block and expanded it to effectively preclude any investigations whatsoever of Saudi-Taliban-Afghan oil connections. Former FBI counter-terrorism chief John O’Neill resigned from the FBI in disgust, stating that he was ordered not to investigate Saudi-Al Qaida connections because of the Enron pipeline deal. Loftus has confirmed that it was O’Neill who originally discovered the AL Qaida pipeline memo after the Embassy bombings in Africa.
O’Neill gave an overview of the Enron block to two French authors who will soon be publishing in the United States. The FBI is currently investigating Loftus’ links to John O’Neill, and is also refusing FBI agent Robert Wright permission to publish his own findings about the Enron block.
Loftus asserts that the Enron block, which remained in force from January 2001 until August 2001 when the pipeline deal collapsed, is the reason that none of FBI agent Rowley’s requests for investigations were ever approved. As numerous British and French authors have concluded, the information provided by European intelligence sources prior to 9/11 was so extensive, that it is no longer possible for either CIA or the FBI to assert a defense of incompetence.
It is time for Congress to face the truth: In order to give Enron one last desperate chance to complete the Taliban pipeline and save itself from bankruptcy, senior levels of US intelligence were ordered to keep their eyes shut and their subordinates ignorant.
The Enron cover-up confirms that 9/11 was not an intelligence failure or a law enforcement failure (at least not entirely). Instead, it was a foreign policy failure of the highest order. If Congress ever combines its Enron investigation with 9/11, Cheney’s whole house of cards will collapse.
A carpet of gold or a carpet of bombs?
AMERICAN MORNING WITH PAULA ZAHN
Explosive New Book Published in France Alleges that U.S. Was in Negotiations to Do a Deal with Taliban
Aired January 8, 2002
PAULA ZAHN, CNN ANCHOR: Time to check in with ambassador-in- residence, Richard Butler, this morning. An explosive new book published in France alleges that the United States was in negotiations to do a deal with the Taliban for an oil pipeline in Afghanistan.
Joining us right now is Richard Butler to shed some light on this new book. He is the former chief U.N. weapons inspector. He is now on the Council on Foreign Relations and our own ambassador-in- residence — good morning.
RICHARD BUTLER, FMR. U.N. WEAPONS INSPECTOR: Good morning, Paula.
ZAHN: Boy, if any of these charges are true…
ZAHN: … this…
ZAHN: … is really big news.
BUTLER: I agree.
ZAHN: Start off with what your understanding is of what is in this book — the most explosive charge.
BUTLER: The most explosive charge, Paula, is that the Bush administration — the present one, just shortly after assuming office slowed down FBI investigations of al Qaeda and terrorism in Afghanistan in order to do a deal with the Taliban on oil — an oil pipeline across Afghanistan.
ZAHN: And this book points out that the FBI’s deputy director, John O’Neill, actually resigned because he felt the U.S. administration was obstructing…
BUTLER: A proper…
ZAHN: … the prosecution of terrorism.
BUTLER: Yes, yes, a proper intelligence investigation of terrorism. Now, you said if, and I affirmed that in responding to you. We have to be careful here. These are allegations. They’re worth airing and talking about, because of their gravity. We don’t know if they are correct. But I believe they should be investigated, because Central Asian oil, as we were discussing yesterday, is potentially so important. And all prior attempts to have a pipeline had to be done through Russia. It had to be negotiated with Russia.
Now, if there is to be a pipeline through Afghanistan, obviating the need to deal with Russia, it would also cost less than half of what a pipeline through Russia would cost. So financially and politically, there’s a big prize to be had. A pipeline through Afghanistan down to the Pakistan coast would bring out that Central Asian oil easier and more cheaply.
ZAHN: (UNINTELLIGIBLE) as you spoke about this yesterday, we almost immediately got a call from “The New York Times.”
ZAHN: They want you to write an op-ed piece on this over the weekend.
BUTLER: Right, and which I will do.
ZAHN: But let’s come back to this whole issue of what John O’Neill, this FBI agent…
ZAHN: … apparently told the authors of this book. He is alleging that — what — the U.S. government was trying to protect U.S. oil interests? And at the same time, shut off the investigation of terrorism to allow for that to happen?
BUTLER: That’s the allegation that instead of prosecuting properly an investigation of terrorism, which has its home in Afghanistan as we now know, or one of its main homes, that was shut down or slowed down in order to pursue oil interests with the Taliban. The people who we have now bombed out of existence, and this not many months ago. The book says that the negotiators said to the Taliban, you have a choice. You have a carpet of gold, meaning an oil deal, or a carpet of bombs. That’s what the book alleges.
ZAHN: Well, I know you’re going to be doing your own independent homework on this…
ZAHN: … to see if you can confirm any of this. Let’s move on to the whole issue of Iraq. The deputy defense secretary, Paul Wolfowitz, at one time was considered one of those voices within the administration…
ZAHN: … that was pushing for moving beyond Afghanistan. He seemed to back off a little from that yesterday.
ZAHN: What do you read through the tea leaves here?
BUTLER: A very interesting report that the administration will focus on the Philippines, Yemen, Somalia as places where there are al Qaeda cells. But the word Iraq wasn’t used by the man who was the chief hawk — used as a, you know, as a future target. So what I interpret from that is this: That very likely our allies have been saying to us, this is too hard. This is really serious. Be careful. Saddam is essentially contained at the moment. Don’t start, you know, a bigger problem either in the Arab world or in the coalition by going after him. And Wolfowitz, it seems, has probably accepted that.
ZAHN: A quick thought on the Israelis intercepting this latest armed shipment? What that means? You’ve got to do it in about 15 seconds.
BUTLER: It’s extraordinarily serious, because it seems to have been tied to Yasser Arafat himself. It needs to be further investigated, but you know, Paula, the potentiality that this could once again prove an impediment to resume peace negotiations is really quite serious.
ZAHN: Thank you as usual for covering so much territory. Richard Butler, see you same time, same place tomorrow morning.
ZAHN: We appreciate your insights.
Israel involved, BIG TIME!
If one knows about Israel’s involvement, the five captured Israelis on 9/11 said later in November of 2001 on an Israeli talk show, “they were there to document the event”, HELLO!!. They were seen celebrating the attacks, trying to blow up the George Washington Bridge and blew up a van on King St near 6th and 7th street. They were arrested by local law enforcement and released. Scott DeCario of the East Rutherford, NJ Police Dept was one of the heroes of 9/11, he spotted the van and is responsible for their capture. These Israeli’s worked for Urban Moving Systems, the owner of this company Dominic Suter escaped to Israel before questioning. More than sixty Israeli’s some active Israel military (Mossad) that were explosive ordinance specialist had been arrested, questioned about 911 and released by Michael Chertoff who was Assistant Attorney General and promoted to head of Homeland Security and also a dual citizen US-Israel.
Also Benjamin Chertoff, Michael Chertoffs cousin, wrote the obsurd 911 Popular Mechanics 911 hit piece trying to deny 911 truth.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what would the attacks mean for US-Israel relations, he said “It’s very good”
Our government? “All Israel involvement is classified top secret.” Fox news asked a highly placed investigator about the evidence and he said “Evidence linking these Israelis to 9-11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It is classified information.”
When one knows and hears…
Lawrence (Larry) Franklin -Former Defense Intelligence Agency analyst expertise in Iranian policy issues worked in the office of Undersecretary of Defense for Douglas Feith and reported directly to Feith’s deputy, William Luti, was sentenced January 20, 2006, “to more than 12 years in prison for giving classified information to an Israeli diplomat” and members of the pro-Israel lobbying group American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).
Ari Fliescher-Dual citizen- US/Israel connected to extremist group- Chabad Lubavitch Hasidics, Bushs White House House spokesman on 911.
Jack Abramoff -Entertained terrorist-patsy Mohammed Atta on his yacht right before 911, criminal lobbyist- dual citizen- US/Israel
Mark Grossmam-Met with General Mahmous Ahmad head of Pakistan ISI 911 financier shortly after 911, Under Secretary for Political affairs, dual citizens – US/Israel
Paul Wolfowitz-Deputy Secretary of War and former PNAC member investigated for spying for Israel chief architect of war, forced to resign over World Bank scandal-dual citizen – US/Israel
Douglas Feith-In command with Wolfowitz on 911 Undersecretary of War investigated for spying for Israel and former PNAC member-dual citizen- US/Israel
Edward Luttwak-Member of the National Security Study Group of the Department of Defence at the Pentagon. Israeli citizen and has taught in Israel. Frequently writes for Israeli and pro-Israeli newspapers and journals. Luttwak is an Israeli extremist whose main theme in many of his articles is the necessity of the U.S. waging war against Iraq and Iran. -dual citizen- US/Israel
Dov Zakheim-former CEO fly by remote manufacturer, Shul Rabbi, CFR member, Pentagon comptroller when 2.3 trillion dollars went missing on 9/10/2001-dual citizen- US/Israel
Elliot Abrams-National Security Council, former PNAC member 1991, found guilty to lying to Congress about Iran-Contra affair-dual citizen- US/Israel
Lewis (Scooter) Libby-Convicted for lying about outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame, Vice President Dick Cheney’s ex-Chief of Staff former PNAC member studied political science under Paul Woldowitz at Yale-dual citizen- US/Israel
Henry Kissinger-Wanted for war crimes in many countries, first chosen for 911 Commission report cover up, on War Policy Board under Perle-dual citizen- US/Israel
William Kristol-PNAC co founder, strong advocate for the Iraq war and editor for The Weekly Standard-dual citizen- US/Israel
Philip Zelikow-Led the 911 commission and personally wrote the 9-11 report, Counselor of US Department of State-dual citizen- US/Israel
Dov Zakheim-Member of the Council on Foreign Relations and in 2000 a co-author of PNAC. He was appointed by Bush as Pentagon Comptroller from May 4, 2001 to March 10, 2004. At that time he was unable to explain the disappearance of $1 trillion dollars. Donald Rumsfeld announced on September 10, 2001 that an audit discovered $2.3 trillion was also missing from the Pentagon books. The two sums disappeared on Zakheim’s watch -dual citizen- US/Israel
Larry Silverstein-Leased WTC before 911 made several billion dollars on 911 admitted to pulling WTC7 Had breakfast in Windows on the World restaurant every morning except 9 11 2001, neither did his daughter who worked in building 7
In 2007 Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio, told Italy’s oldest and most widely read newspaper that the 9-11 terrorist attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad, and that “this is common knowledge among global intelligence agencies”.
“All the intelligence services of America and Europe know well that the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the Mossad, with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part … in Iraq and Afghanistan.” and you have suspicions makes you a Truther, then I am a Truther
If someone knows the definitions of terrorism…
- A psychological strategy of war for gaining political ends by deliberately creating a well-founded climate of fear among the civilian population.
- The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence against people or property to coerce or intimidate governments or societies .
- The systematic use of terror, the deliberate creation and exploitation of fear for bringing about political change .
- The use of – or threatened use of – criminal violence against civilians or civilian infrastructure to achieve political ends through fear and intimidation , rather than direct confrontation.
- The calculated use of violence (or threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that are political or religious or ideological in nature; this is done through intimidation or coercion or instilling fear .
And they wonder just who the real terrorist are makes you a Truther, then I am a Truther.
It’s been 9 years!
None of us are where we are supposed to be today because of what happened on 9/11/2001. Until we get the arrogant failures out of government and main stream media who use their power to keep the masses eyes off the ball, we might as well be trying to build the Freedom Tower from the top down.
You cannot build a skyscraper from the top down. Everything happening today and since 9-11, our wars on people and religion etc,etc is based on the biggest lie ever perpetrated in the history of the world. Many have fallen into the web of deceit, many are there for profit and power, this has bankrupted us, not only financially, but morally. In this writers opinion there is and has not been a single issue of importance since 9-11, not any other issue can be of any importance and can only be a diversion to the cover up and unanswered questions of 3000 plus of our fellow brothers and sisters, all the while these murderers still run free right under our very noses as the countless people die every day from the spell that has bound the world.
If someone were to blow this information off as a conspiracy theory, would that make them a “Truth Denier”, complicit, or both.
We are living a lie, please don’t be fooled, there is a war on truth, what you have read here is a drop in a swimming pool (a big one) to the rest of the story.
I was going to write up a big conclusion, come to your own. I think it’s pretty self evident, all we have to do is look at not who was to gain, but who gained, it’s all history now. Keep in mind if this stays under the rug the next event will make 9/11 look like a pin prick, they get bigger every time.
“Truths are to be taken on their own and not adulterated or substantiated by any so-called ‘source’, hard as that may seem for many” –Zen
“They must find it difficult…Those who have taken authority as the truth, rather than truth as the authority.”-Gerald Massey, Egyptologist
Until next communication, over and out!